Literature DB >> 24035541

Genetic and neural modularity underlie the evolution of schooling behavior in threespine sticklebacks.

Anna K Greenwood1, Abigail R Wark, Kohta Yoshida, Catherine L Peichel.   

Abstract

Although descriptions of striking diversity in animal behavior are plentiful, little is known about the mechanisms by which behaviors change and evolve between groups. To fully understand behavioral evolution, it will be necessary to identify the genetic mechanisms that mediate behavioral change in a natural context. Genetic analysis of behavior can also reveal associations between behavior and morphological or neural phenotypes, providing insight into the proximate mechanisms that control behavior. Relatively few studies to date have successfully identified genes or genomic regions that contribute to behavioral variation among natural populations or species, particularly in vertebrates. Here, we apply genetic approaches to dissect a complex social behavior that has long fascinated biologists, schooling behavior. We performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of schooling in an F2 intercross between strongly schooling marine and weakly schooling benthic sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and found that distinct genetic modules control different aspects of schooling behavior. Two key components of the behavior, tendency to school and body position when schooling, are uncorrelated in hybrids and map to different genomic regions. Our results further point to a genetic link between one behavioral component, schooling position, and variation in the neurosensory lateral line.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24035541      PMCID: PMC3828509          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  23 in total

1.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Andrea Perna; Richard P Mann; Timothy M Schaerf; David J T Sumpter; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Candidate genes for behavioural ecology.

Authors:  Mark J Fitzpatrick; Yehuda Ben-Shahar; Hans M Smid; Louise E M Vet; Gene E Robinson; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The genetics of adaptive shape shift in stickleback: pleiotropy and effect size.

Authors:  Arianne Y K Albert; Sterling Sawaya; Timothy H Vines; Anne K Knecht; Craig T Miller; Brian R Summers; Sarita Balabhadra; David M Kingsley; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay; Eric A Stone; Julien F Ayroles
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Novel methods for discriminating behavioral differences between stickleback individuals and populations in a laboratory shoaling assay.

Authors:  Abigail R Wark; Barry J Wark; Tessa J Lageson; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  QTL analysis of behavioral and morphological differentiation between wild and laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Dominic Wright; Reiichiro Nakamichi; Jens Krause; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Lateral line diversity among ecologically divergent threespine stickleback populations.

Authors:  A R Wark; C L Peichel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Genes and social behavior.

Authors:  Gene E Robinson; Russell D Fernald; David F Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A blind fish can school.

Authors:  T J Pitcher; B L Partridge; C S Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Heritable differences in schooling behavior among threespine stickleback populations revealed by a novel assay.

Authors:  Abigail R Wark; Anna K Greenwood; Elspeth M Taylor; Kohta Yoshida; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and neural control of sexually dimorphic social behaviors.

Authors:  Taehong Yang; Nirao M Shah
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Genetic editing of the androgen receptor contributes to impaired male courtship behavior in zebrafish.

Authors:  Lengxob Yong; Zayer Thet; Yong Zhu
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Applying gene regulatory network logic to the evolution of social behavior.

Authors:  Nicole M Baran; Patrick T McGrath; J Todd Streelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance.

Authors:  Thomas W Pike; Michael Ramsey; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Evolution: skipping school.

Authors:  Alison M Bell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Evolution of Schooling Behavior in Threespine Sticklebacks Is Shaped by the Eda Gene.

Authors:  Anna K Greenwood; Margaret G Mills; Abigail R Wark; Sophie L Archambeault; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Integrating molecular mechanisms into quantitative genetics to understand consistent individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Alison M Bell; Ned A Dochtermann
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-12-01

8.  A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol for stickleback tissue.

Authors:  Noelle James; Xiaochen Liu; Alison Bell
Journal:  Evol Ecol Res       Date:  2016

9.  Natural courtship song variation caused by an intronic retroelement in an ion channel gene.

Authors:  Yun Ding; Augusto Berrocal; Tomoko Morita; Kit D Longden; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Representing sex in the brain, one module at a time.

Authors:  Cindy F Yang; Nirao M Shah
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.