Literature DB >> 24034561

Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian.

David S Pilliod1, Caren S Goldberg, Robert S Arkle, Lisette P Waits.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods for detecting and estimating abundance of aquatic species are emerging rapidly, but little is known about how processes such as secretion rate, environmental degradation, and time since colonization or extirpation from a given site affect eDNA measurements. Using stream-dwelling salamanders and quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis, we conducted three experiments to assess eDNA: (i) production rate; (ii) persistence time under different temperature and light conditions; and (iii) detectability and concentration through time following experimental introduction and removal of salamanders into previously unoccupied streams. We found that 44-50 g individuals held in aquaria produced 77 ng eDNA/h for 2 h, after which production either slowed considerably or began to equilibrate with degradation. eDNA in both full-sun and shaded treatments degraded exponentially to <1% of the original concentration after 3 days. eDNA was no longer detectable in full-sun samples after 8 days, whereas eDNA was detected in 20% of shaded samples after 11 days and 100% of refrigerated control samples after 18 days. When translocated into unoccupied streams, salamanders were detectable after 6 h, but only when densities were relatively high (0.2481 individuals/m(2) ) and when samples were collected within 5 m of the animals. Concentrations of eDNA detected were very low and increased steadily from 6-24 h after introduction, reaching 0.0022 ng/L. Within 1 h of removing salamanders from the stream, eDNA was no longer detectable. These results suggest that eDNA detectability and concentration depend on production rates of individuals, environmental conditions, density of animals, and their residence time. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords:  DNA degradation; Dicamptodon aterrimus; Idaho giant salamander; environmental DNA; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24034561     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  75 in total

1.  Estimations of Riverine Distribution, Abundance, and Biomass of Anguillid Eels in Japan and Taiwan Using Environmental DNA Analysis.

Authors:  Hikaru Itakura; Ryoshiro Wakiya; Masayuki K Sakata; Hsiang-Yi Hsu; Shih-Chong Chen; Chih-Chao Yang; Yi-Cheng Huang; Yu-San Han; Satoshi Yamamoto; Toshifumi Minamoto
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Environmental DNA for improved detection and environmental surveillance of schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Mita E Sengupta; Micaela Hellström; Henry C Kariuki; Annette Olsen; Philip F Thomsen; Helena Mejer; Eske Willerslev; Mariam T Mwanje; Henry Madsen; Thomas K Kristensen; Anna-Sofie Stensgaard; Birgitte J Vennervald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modelling the transport of environmental DNA through a porous substrate using continuous flow-through column experiments.

Authors:  Arial J Shogren; Jennifer L Tank; Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz; Brett Olds; Christopher Jerde; Diogo Bolster
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Towards environmental detection of Chagas disease vectors and pathogen.

Authors:  Grace Gysin; Plutarco Urbano; Luke Brandner-Garrod; Shahida Begum; Mojca Kristan; Thomas Walker; Carolina Hernández; Juan David Ramírez; Louisa A Messenger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake.

Authors:  Jessica J Eichmiller; Przemyslaw G Bajer; Peter W Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The application of eDNA for monitoring of the Great Crested Newt in the UK.

Authors:  Helen C Rees; Keith Bishop; David J Middleditch; James R M Patmore; Ben C Maddison; Kevin C Gough
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction.

Authors:  Mark A Renshaw; Brett P Olds; Christopher L Jerde; Margaret M McVeigh; David M Lodge
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Assessing environmental DNA detection in controlled lentic systems.

Authors:  Gregory R Moyer; Edgardo Díaz-Ferguson; Jeffrey E Hill; Colin Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.