Literature DB >> 24033917

Hospital-acquired conditions after orthopedic surgery do not affect patient satisfaction scores.

Michael S Day, Lorraine H Hutzler, Raj Karia, Kella Vangsness, Nina Setia, Joseph A Bosco.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether development of a hospital-acquired condition (HAC) affected responses to Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey questions. HCAHPS is a national, standardized satisfaction survey. Patient responses form, in part, the basis for Medicare reimbursement to hospitals via the value-based purchasing system established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. We hypothesized that patients who developed an HAC would be less satisfied with their care.
METHODS: We randomly distributed the HCAHPS survey, a validated, standardized measure of patient satisfaction, to 6,056 patients discharged from our institution for any orthopedic admission over a 2-year period. All patients who develop HACs are logged by our hospital quality assurance monitoring system. We reviewed the HCAHPS database, identified completed surveys associated with patients who had developed an HAC, and compared satisfaction scores between patients with HACs and patients without HACs. Survey scores were normalized to a 100-point scale. Univariate analysis was performed for two global ratings, and six specific satisfaction categories. Subgroup analysis was performed for surgical site infections (SSIs) and venous thromboembolic disease (VTE).
RESULTS: A total of 2,876 controls and 159 HAC cases were identified from completed surveys. The cases and controls were similar in terms of race, however, the HAC group contained significantly more women (p < .001). Patients in the HAC group also were, on average, significantly older, with a mean age of 66.84 versus 58.65 (p < .001). There was no difference in satisfaction scores in patients' mean rating of communication by nurses (p = .81), communication by doctors (p = .31), communication about medications (p = .69), pain control (p = .66), the cleanliness of the hospital environment (p = .54), and the quietness of the hospital (p = .589). The mean normalized score for overall satisfaction was 93.99 (out of 100) for controls and 94.84 for HAC cases (p = .61). The mean normalized score for overall willingness to recommend the hospital to others was 90.22 for controls and 90.65 for HAC cases (p = .77). There was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction for patients with SSI versus VTE versus all other HACs (p > .05). DISCUSSION: Performance on HCAHPS is an area that demands hospital attention both to provide patient-centered care and to maximize revenue. Development of an HAC was not associated with decreased satisfaction scores in a population of orthopedic surgery patients at a private, university-affiliated specialty center. The lack of any statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction may be attributable to patient satisfaction with care in response to complications, the decreased sensitivity inherent to using a general satisfaction survey, or a homogeneity among orthopedic surgery patients and their expectations of care.
© 2013 National Association for Healthcare Quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAC; HCAHPS; quality; satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033917     DOI: 10.1111/jhq.12031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  8 in total

1.  Goals and Objectives to Optimize the Value of an Acute Pain Service in Perioperative Pain Management.

Authors:  Linda Le-Wendling; Wesley Glick; Patrick Tighe
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-12

2.  Satisfaction with surgeon care as measured by the Surgery-CAHPS survey is not related to NSQIP outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Characteristics and Predictors of HCAHPS Nonresponse After Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Rohil Malpani; Murillo Adrados; Michael R Mercier; Ryan P McLynn; Anoop R Galivanche; Neil Pathak; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections through Lean Six Sigma: The case of the medicine areas at the Federico II University Hospital in Naples (Italy).

Authors:  Giovanni Improta; Mario Cesarelli; Paolo Montuori; Liberatina Carmela Santillo; Maria Triassi
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  A multifaceted study of hospital variables and interventions to improve inpatient satisfaction in a multi-hospital system.

Authors:  Mamta Puppala; Chika F Ezeana; Miguel Valdivia Y Alvarado; Kimberly N Goode; Rebecca L Danforth; Solomon S Y Wong; Mark L Vassallo; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Correlation of Patient Reported Satisfaction With Adverse Events Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Single Institution Analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Mercier; Anoop R Galivanche; Ryan McLean; Alexander J Kammien; Courtney S Toombs; Daniel R Rubio; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-08-13

7.  Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Elbert J Mets; Michael R Mercier; Ari S Hilibrand; Michelle C Scott; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  The impact of a patient education bundle on neurosurgery patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Tamara Kliot; Corinna C Zygourakis; Sarah Imershein; Catherine Lau; Michel Kliot
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.