Literature DB >> 24033373

Interference between active implanted medical devices and electromagnetic field emitting devices is rare but real: results of an incidence study in a population of physicians in France.

Martine Hours1, Inès Khati, Joel Hamelin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Assessing the behavior of active implanted medical devices (AIMDs) in response to electromagnetic field (EMF) transmitters is a current issue of great importance. Given the numerous telecommunication systems and our lack of knowledge as to the impact of electromagnetic effects, this study investigated the reality of possible AIMD disturbance by EMFs by interviewing health professionals.
METHOD: A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to almost 5,000 physicians in five specialties: cardiology; endocrinology; ears, nose, and throat; urology; and neurology. It collected data on the existence and annual number of incidents observed and the conditions under which they occurred, the EMF sources involved, and the means of managing the malfunctions.
RESULTS: A total of 1,188 physicians agreed to participate. Sixteen percent of participants reported cases of implant failure, three-quarters of whom, mainly in cardiology, reported rates of at least one incident per year-amounting to more than 100 incidents per year in all. Severity appeared to be moderate (discomfort or transient symptoms), but frequently required resetting or, more rarely, replacing the device. Some serious incidents were, however, reported. The sources implicated were basically of two types: electronic security systems (antitheft and airport gates) and medical electromagnetic radiation devices. These incidents were poorly reported within the public health system, preventing follow-up and effective performance of alert and surveillance functions.
CONCLUSION: Although minor, the risk of interference between EMF sources and AIMDs is real and calls for vigilance. It particularly concerns antitheft and airport security gates, though other sources may also cause incidents. ©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active implanted medical devices; adverse effects; electromagnetic fields; electromagnetic interference; equipment failure; medical survey; mobile phones; postal questionnaire; security systems

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033373     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare.

Authors:  Gesa von Olshausen; Ina-Christine Rondak; Carsten Lennerz; Verena Semmler; Christian Grebmer; Tilko Reents; Sonia Ammar-Busch; Alessandra Buiatti; Felix Bourier; Isabel Deisenhofer; Christof Kolb
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects.

Authors:  Joshua Guag; Bisrat Addissie; Donald Witters
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Hye Bin Gwag; Hyun Sung Joh; June Soo Kim; Kyoung-Min Park; Young Keun On; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Inappropriate shock delivery as a result of electromagnetic interference originating from the faulty electrical installation.

Authors:  Milos D Babic; Milosav Tomovic; Maja Milosevic; Branko Djurdjevic; Vasko Zugic; Aleksandra Nikolic
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.485

5.  Perceptions and knowledge toward mobile-health among the college going students in Coastal South India.

Authors:  Prasanna Mithra Parthaje; Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan; Rekha Thapar; Nithin Kumar; Elizabeth Josy Panikulam; Elina Geroge; Prajwal Pai; Vaman Kulkarni; Ramesh Holla; Bhagwan Bhagyamma Darshan; Avinash Kumar; Rohil Mehta; Ratna Jay
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

6.  Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Driessen; Andreas Napp; Kristina Schmiedchen; Thomas Kraus; Dominik Stunder
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.