| Literature DB >> 24031878 |
R M Etto1, L M Cruz, E C Jesus, C W Galvão, F Galvão, E M Souza, F O Pedrosa, M B R Steffens.
Abstract
The acidic peatlands of southern Brazil are ecosystems essential for the maintenance of the Atlantic Forest, one of the 25 hot-spots of biodiversity in the world. In this work, we investigated the composition of prokaryotic communities in four histosols of three acidic peatland regions by constructing small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene libraries and sequencing. SSU rRNA gene sequence analysis showed the prevalence of Acidobacteria (38.8%) and Proteobacteria (27.4%) of the Bacteria domain and Miscellaneous (58%) and Terrestrial (24%) groups of Crenarchaeota of the Archaea domain. As observed in other ecosystems, archaeal communities showed lower richness than bacterial communities. We also found a limited number of Euryarchaeota and of known methanotrophic bacteria in the clone libraries.Entities:
Keywords: SSU rRNA gene; acidic peatland; microbial ecology; prokaryotic communities
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031878 PMCID: PMC3768831 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000200031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
DistributionofOTUsand soil chemical attributes of the samples
| Sample | Bacterial OTU | Archaeal OTU | PH CaCl2 | g/kg C | g/kg OM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unshared | Shared | Unshared | Shared | ||||
| SM20 | 69 (80.2%) | 17 (19.8%) | 43 (74.1%) | 15 (25.9%) | 3.20 | 256.11 | 441.54 |
| CG20 | 48 (60.7%) | 31 (39.3%) | 46 (66.7%) | 23 (33.3%) | 3.80 | 265.81 | 458.50 |
| CG50 | 37 (58.7%) | 26 (41.3%) | 22 (40.8%) | 32 (59.2%) | 3.80 | 267.01 | 460.10 |
| PA20 | 136 (80%) | 34 (20%) | 61 (69.3%) | 27 (30.7%) | 4.00 | 172.57 | 297.51 |
C= carbon; OM= organic matter.
Figure 1Taxonomic composition of the prokaryotic communities. Sequences of (A) Bacteria and (B) Archaea domains were compared with Ribosomal Database Project II and Silva Database respectively. Significant differences with respect to phyla frequencies per sample were observed in a Chi-square test.
Figure 2Renyi diversity profiles and similarity dendograms based in OTU. (A) Comparison of the Renyi diversity profiles of the peatland prokaryote communities. The profile values for alpha = 0, 1, 2 and infinity indicate the species richness, Shannon diversity index, logarithm of the reciprocal Simpson diversity index and Berger Parker diversity index, respectively. If the profile for one sample was consistently higher than the profile for another sample, the sample with the higher profile was considered more diverse. When curves for two communities intersect, this means that they cannot be ranked. (B) and (C) show an average linkage clustering dendrogram based on the Bray–Curtis distances among bacterial and archaeal communities, respectively.
Figure S1Phylogenetic relationships among acidobacterial OTUs and their areas of origin. Each circle represents a different OTU and the number after its ID indicates the number of sequences that compose this OTU. Each colour represents a different area as shown in the picture. The bar indicates the proportion of sequences of each genus. Phylogenies were estimated by neighbor joining with the TrN model and γcorrection (α = 0.4882). Tree is unrooted. The scale bar represents changes per nucleotide.
Figure S2Phylogenetic relationships among proteobacterial OTU and their areas of origin. Each circle represents a different OTU and the number after its ID indicates the number of sequences that compose this OTU. Each colour represents a different area as shown in the picture. The bar indicates the proportion of sequences of each class. Phylogenies were estimated by neighbor joining with the TrN model and γ correction (α = 0.6241). The tree is unrooted. The scale bar represents changes per nucleotide.
Prokaryotic OTUs shared among the libraries. The sequences that compose the bacterial and archaeal OTUs were compared with Ribosomal Database Project II and Silva database respectively. The number of OTUs that compose each taxon are shown in parentheses.
| Libraries | Bacteria shared | Archaea shared |
|---|---|---|
| SM20 CG20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 CG50 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 PA20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| CG20 CG50 | MCG ( | |
| CG20 PA20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| PA20 CG50 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 CG20 CG50 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 CG20 PA20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 CG50 PA20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| CG20 CG50 PA20 | Terrestrial Group ( | |
| SM20 CG20 CG50 PA20 | MCG ( |
Figure S3Phylogenetic relationships among crenarcheotal sequences and their origin. Each colour represents a different area as shown in the picture. Sequences were classified using Silva database. Phylogenies were estimated by neighbor joining with the LogDet. Tree is unrooted. The scale bar represents changes per nucleotide. Each symbol represents a different area. Clades of the Terrestrial Group (TG) and Micellaneous Crearchaeota Group (MCG) are indicated on the tree.
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationships among methanogenics OTUs and their areas of origin. Each circle represents a different OTU and the number after its ID indicates the number of sequences that compose this OTU. Each colour represents a different area as shown in the picture. The bar indicates the proportion of sequences in each group. Sequences were compared with the NCBI and Silva database for the construction of the tree. Phylogenies were estimated by neighbor joining with the TrN model and γ correction (α =1.0852). The tree was rooted using Thermofilum pendens and Thermoproteus tenax as an outgroup. The scale bar represents changes per nucleotide.
Figure 4Rarefaction curve analyses of bacterial and archaeal SSU rRNA gene sequences across all sites. Bacterial sequences are represented by light gray diamonds and archaeal by dark gray squares.