| Literature DB >> 24031853 |
Nivedita Sharma1, Richa Kaushal, Rakesh Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar.
Abstract
Aspergillus niger F7 isolated from soil was found to be the potent producer of cellulase and xylanase. The residue of forest species Toona ciliata, Celtris australis, Cedrus deodara and Pinus roxburghii was selected as substrate for biodegradation study due to its easy availability and wide use in industry. It was subjected to alkali (sodium hydroxide) treatment for enhancing its degradation. Biodegradation of forest waste by hydrolytic enzymes (cellulase and xylanase) secreted by A. niger under solid state fermentation (SSF) was explored. SSF of pretreated forest biomass was found to be superior over untreated forest biomass. Highest extracellular enzyme activity of 2201±23.91 U/g by A. niger was shown in pretreated C. australis wood resulting in 6.72±0.20 percent hydrolysis and 6.99±0.23 biodegradation index (BI). The lowest BI of 1.40±0.08 was observed in untreated saw dust of C. deodara having the least enzyme activity of 238±1.36 U/g of dry matter. Biodegradation of forest biomass under SSF was increased many folds when moistening agent i.e. tap water had been replaced with modified basal salt media (BSM). In BSM mediated degradation of forest waste with A. niger, extracellular enzyme activity was increased up to 4089±67.11 U/g of dry matter in turn resulting in higher BI of 15.4±0.41 and percent hydrolysis of 19.38±0.81 in pretreated C. australis wood. A. niger exhibited higher enzyme activity on pretreated biomass when moistened with modified BSM in this study. Statistically a positive correlation has been drawn between these three factors i.e. enzyme activity, BI and percent hydrolysis of forest biomass thus proving their direct relationship with each other.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus niger; SSF; biodegradation index; enzyme activity; percent hydrolysis
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031853 PMCID: PMC3768808 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000200006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Screening of fungal isolates for cellulase and xylanase enzyme production
| Isolate no. | CMCase Activity (U/ml)[ | FPase Activity (U/ml)[ | β-glucosidase Activity (U/ml)[ | Total Cellulase Activity (U/ml)[ | Xylanase Activity (U/ml)[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.57 |
| F2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
| F3 | - | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| F4 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| F5 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.52 |
| F6 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 0.99 |
| F7 | 0.54 | 0.15 | 2.08 | 2.77 | 1.92 |
| F8 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 1.59 | 1.89 | 1.05 |
| F9 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.00 |
| F10 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.31 | 1.36 | 0.99 |
| F11 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 0.83 |
μmoles of reducing sugars released/min/ml of enzyme
Figure 1BI of untreated and pretreated forest biomass after SSF by A. niger
Figure 2Percent hydrolysis of untreated and pretreated forest biomass after SSF by A. niger
Enzyme activity of cellulase and xylanase of untreated and pretreated forest biomass after SSF by A. niger using water and modified BSM as medium
| Water | Modified BSM | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated biomass (U/g)[ | Pretreated biomass (U/g)[ | Untreated biomass (U/g)[ | Pretreated biomass (U/g)[ | |||||||||||
| Substrate | Cellulase | Xylanase | Cellulase + Xylanase | Cellulase | Xylanase | Cellulase + Xylanase | percent increase in total enzyme activity[ | Cellulase | Xylanase | Cellulase + Xylanase | Cellulase | Xylanase | Cellulase + Xylanase | percent increase in total enzyme activity[ |
| 336.81 ±1.34 | 188.75 ±6.32[ | 525.60 ±3.64 | 978.28 ±12.87 | 729.56 ±6.49 | 1708.00 ±19.69 | 224.96 ±7.01 | 987.98 ±11.68 | 688.42 ±8.62 | 1676.00 ±20.68 | 2533.13 ±21.68 | 936.40 ±11.38 | 3470.00 ±46.42 | 107.04 ±1.02 | |
| 682.15 ±7.48 | 307.86 ±2.78 | 990.00 ±7.87 | 1239.72 ±33.13 | 961.29 ±7.41 | 2201.00 ±23.91 | 122.32 ±0.98 | 1612.46 ±19.44 | 906.08 ±11.32 | 2519.00 ±23.42 | 2991.58 ±42.39 | 1097.00 ±24.60 | 4089.00 ±67.11 | 62.33 ±0.73 | |
| 160.26 ±1.40 | 77.76 ±0.46 | 238.00 ±1.36 | 306.73 ±8.94 | 198.14 ±2.13 | 504.90 ±8.67 | 112.14 ±0.96 | 229.05 ±5.02 | 153.06 ±4.04 | 382.10 ±3.62 | 486.11 ±8.62 | 325.42 ±6.42 | 811.50 ±9.86 | 112.38 ±0.95 | |
| 186.75 ±0.98 | 96.90 ±0.97 | 283.70 ±2.67 | 259.07 ±7.34 | 211.27 ±3.07 | 507.30 ±7.64 | 101.02 ±0.96 | 291.80 ±4.87 | 190.94 ±2.13 | 487.70 ±4.42 | 707.88 ±7.69 | 398.51 ±4.68 | 1106.00 ±11.32 | 129.13 ±1.32 | |
| Mixed substrate | 305.02 ±1.02 | 178.52 ±0.88 | 483.50 ±2.32 | 930.91 ±14.24 | 681.23 ±8.78 | 1612.00 ±16.98 | 233.40 ±7.32 | 773.39 ±10.69 | 621.86 ±11.32 | 1395.00 ±12.36 | 2095.70 ±29.64 | 902.19 ±12.62 | 2998.00 ±21.62 | 114.91 1.26 |
On dry matter basis
Per cent increase is over untreated forest biomass
standard error of mean
Estimation of enzyme activity, BI and percent hydrolysis by CRD
| Treatment | Enzyme activity | BI | Percent hydrolysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water as moistening agent | 911.70 2.85 | 2.92 | 2.81 |
| BSM as moistening agent | 1892.93 3.18 | 7.90 | 7.39 |
| Untreated biomass | 897.56 2.83 | 4.20 | 3.44 |
| Pretreated biomass | 1907.07 3.18 | 6.62 | 6.76 |
| Water × untreated biomass | 504.016 2.65 | 1.86 | 2.11 |
| Water × pretreated biomass | 1329.24 3.05 | 3.97 | 3.50 |
| BSM× untreated biomass | 1290.96 3.01 | 6.53 | 4.36 |
| BSM× pretreated biomass | 2494.9 3.32 | 9.26 | 10.02 |
Figures in subscript are log transformed values CD0.05: Moistening agent = 0.29, Treatment = 0.29, Moistening agent ×treatment = 0.42
Figure 3Percent increase in BI and percent hydrolysis of pretreated over untreated forest biomass after SSF by A. niger using water and modified BSM as medium
Parameters of various models to predict enzyme activity, BI and percent hydrolysis
| Characters | Prediction model for BI (Y) on the basis of enzyme activity | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y =a + bX | R2 | Y = abX | R2 | Y =aXb | R2 | Y =aExpbX | R2 | |||||
| a | b | a | b | a | b | a | b | |||||
| 1 | 0.27 | 0.003 | 0.84 | .878 | 1.001 | 0.769 | .005 | 0.918 | 0.822 | .878 | 0.01 | 0.769 |
| 2 | 1.600 | 0.03 | .896 | 2.822 | 1.000 | .868 | .030 | .744 | .930 | 2.822 | .000 | .868 |
| 1 | .418 | .003 | .898 | 1.179 | 1.001 | 0.952 | .025 | .699 | .875 | 1.179 | .001 | .952 |
| 2 | 1.488 | 0.05 | .946 | 1.336 | 1.001 | .933 | .001 | 1.127 | .947 | 1.336 | .001 | .933 |
Where X = enzyme activity, Y = BI/percent hydrolysis, R2 = coefficient of determination