| Literature DB >> 24031809 |
Iriani R Maldonade1, Delia B Rodriguez-Amaya, Adilma R P Scamparini.
Abstract
Sequential statistical methods were used to maximise carotenoid production by a strain of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, isolated from the Brazilian ecosystem. Initially, a factorial 2(5-1) experimental design was used, and the variables were pH and the levels of glucose, yeast extract, MgSO4.7H2O and KH2PO4. The nitrogen source (yeast extract) was the most important variable in enhancing carotenoid production; MgSO4.7H2O and KH2PO4 had a negative influence. The initial pH had no significant effect on carotenoid and cell productions. We further investigated the effects of glucose and yeast extract effects, using a second-order central composite design (CCD) to optimise carotenoid production, which was adequately approximated with a full quadratic equation obtained from a two-factor-2-level design. The analysis of quadratic surfaces showed that after 5 days of cultivation at 25 °C, the maximum carotenoid concentration (745 µg l(-1)) was obtained with 15 g l(-1) of yeast extract and 20 g l(-1) of glucose. The maximum carotenoid production (152 µg g(-1)) was obtained with 5 g l(-1) yeast extract and 10 g l(-1) glucose. Carotenoid formation was more sensitive to changes in yeast extract concentration than to changes in glucose concentration. Maximum cell production was achieved with 15-17 g l(-1) of yeast extract and 15-20 g l(-1) of glucose.Entities:
Keywords: Rhodotorula mucilaginosa; fermentation; response surface design; torulene; yeast
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031809 PMCID: PMC3768983 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220120001000012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
25–1 factorial design with coded values and experimental results obtained after 5 days of fermentation for biomass production, carotenoid production and yield.
| Variables | Results | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assay no. | A | B | C | D | E | Carotenoid production (μg l-1) | Carotenoid production (μg g-1) | Yield (μg g-1 sugar) | Biomass(g l-1) | Residual sugar (g l-1) |
| 1 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 59 | 53 | 10 | 1.1 | 4.1 |
| 2 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 138 | 39 | 1.8 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 160 | 76 | 18 | 2.1 | 31 |
| 4 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 142 | 77 | 15 | 1.8 | 31 |
| 5 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 665 | 173 | 70 | 3.8 | 0.6 |
| 6 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 445 | 128 | 46 | 3.5 | 0.3 |
| 7 | 4 | 40 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 678 | 139 | 44 | 4.9 | 25 |
| 8 | 6 | 40 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 904 | 162 | 50 | 5.6 | 22 |
| 9 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 389 | 93 | 41 | 4.2 | 0.6 |
| 10 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 145 | 32 | 15 | 4.5 | 0.7 |
| 11 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 243 | 56 | 16 | 4.4 | 25 |
| 12 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 431 | 80 | 29 | 5.4 | 25 |
| 13 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 731 | 120 | 75 | 6.1 | 0.2 |
| 14 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 758 | 122 | 78 | 6.2 | 0.2 |
| 15 | 4 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 397 | 47 | 17 | 8.5 | 16 |
| 16 | 6 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 713 | 67 | 27 | 11 | 14 |
| 17 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 0.5 | 4 | 670 | 77 | 34 | 8.7 | 5.1 |
| 18 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 0.5 | 4 | 671 | 72 | 33 | 9.3 | 4.5 |
| 19 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 0.5 | 4 | 620 | 68 | 30 | 9.1 | 4.5 |
A=Initial pH, B=Glucose (g l-1), C= Yeast extract (g l-1), D= MgSO4.7H2O (g l-1), E= KH2PO4 (g l-1)
22 factorial design values and experimental results obtained from fermentation of R. mucilaginosa-137 with varying concentrations of glucose and yeast extract.
| Variables | Results | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assays | Yeast extract (g l-1) | Glucose (g l-1) | Biomass (g l-1) | Carotenoid production (μg l-1) | Carotenoid production (μg g-1) | Residual sugar (g l-1) | Protein (%) |
| 1 | 5.0 | 10 | 3.2 | 488 | 152 | 0.3 | 47 |
| 2 | 15 | 10 | 6.5 | 679 | 104 | 0.5 | 55 |
| 3 | 5.0 | 20 | 5.3 | 609 | 116 | 2.6 | 52 |
| 4 | 15 | 20 | 8.0 | 745 | 93 | 0.8 | 68 |
| 5 | 10 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 637 | 127 | 0.4 | 51 |
| 6 | 10 | 22 | 7.4 | 671 | 91 | 2.2 | 56 |
| 7 | 2.9 | 15 | 2.5 | 250 | 100 | 3.5 | 39 |
| 8 | 17 | 15 | 8.0 | 671 | 84 | 0.7 | 55 |
| 9 | 10 | 15 | 6.6 | 702 | 106 | 0.6 | 49 |
| 10 | 10 | 15 | 6.5 | 728 | 111 | 0.5 | 51 |
| 11 | 10 | 15 | 6.4 | 732 | 114 | 0.5 | 52 |
Analysis of variance for the regression model of carotenoid production (after ignoring the insignificant effects) and biomass, obtained from the response surface experiments.
| Source | Carotenoid production (μg l-1) | Biomass (g l-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | Df | MS | SS | Df | MS | |
| Regression | 184,558.8 | 3 | 61,519.6 | 32.105 | 5 | 6.421 |
| Residual | 24,645.7 | 7 | 3,520.81 | 0.4217 | 5 | 0.0843 |
| Lack of fit | 24,115.0 | 5 | 4,823.0 | 0.4017 | 3 | 0.1339 |
| Pure error | 530.7 | 2 | 265.3 | 0.020 | 2 | 0.010 |
| Total | 209,204.5 | 10 | 32.527 | 10 | ||
| F model | 17.47 | 76.17 | ||||
| MSLf/MSPe | 18.18 | 13.39 | ||||
| R2 | 0.88 | 0.98 | ||||
Figure 1Response surface diagrams as a function of yeast extract and glucose concentrations: (A): biomass production (g l-1); (B): carotenoid production (µg l-1).