| Literature DB >> 24031727 |
Gaby Tiemi Suzuki1, Juliana Alves Macedo, Gabriela Alves Macedo.
Abstract
Complex B vitamins as Biotin and Riboflavin are required by living organisms, not only for growth but also for metabolite production, and the feed market classifies them as growth promoters. Since Brazil will soon be one of the world's biggest animal protein producers, feed production is a large consumer of vitamins and micronutrients. The industry requires 10 mg riboflavin/0.2 mg biotin per kilogram of feed; a ratio of 40 ~ 50:1. Although few studies have been conducted specifically on riboflavin production using factorial design and surface response method as an optimization strategy, it is a common practice in biotechnology with many research reports available. However, there are no reports on the use of statistical design for biotin production. This study set out to evaluate medium composition influence on biotin and riboflavin production using a statistical design. There are no studies relating biotin and riboflavin production by Candida sp LEB 130. In this preliminary study to improve the simultaneous production of biotin and riboflavin, the maximum riboflavin/biotin ratio of 8.3 μg/mL was achieved with medium component concentrations of: sucrose 30 g/L, KH2PO4 2 g/L, MgSO4 1 g/L and ZnSO4 0.5mL/L.Entities:
Keywords: Candida sp.; biotin; media development; riboflavin; vitamin production
Year: 2011 PMID: 24031727 PMCID: PMC3768789 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220110003000030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Independent variables and the concentration levels studied in the 26–2 factorial optimization design for both riboflavin and biotin production.
| Variable | Components | Level of variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | +1 | ||
| Sucrose (g/L) | 10 | 20 | 30 | |
| Ammonium tartrate(g/L) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| KH2PO4 (g/L) | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| MgSO4 .7 H2O (g/L) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| Ferric Citrate (mL/L) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | |
| ZnSO4.7H2O (mL/L) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | |
A 26–2 factorial design matrix of six variables with experimental riboflavin and biotin production values by Candida sp. LEB 130.
| Run | Sucrose x1
| Ammonium x2 | KH2PO4 x3
| MgSO4 x4
| Citrate x5
| ZnSO4 x6
| Riboflavin Production (μg/mL) | Biotin Production (μg/mL) | Riboflavin Biotin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | |||||||||
| 1 | -1 (10) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1.27 | 3.70 | 0.34 | 0.80 |
| 2 | 1 (30) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 2.85 | 2.21 | 1.29 | 1.49 |
| 3 | -1 (10) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 2.09 | 5.61 | 0.37 | -1.78 |
| 4 | 1 (30) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0.00 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| 5 | -1 (10) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 3.35 | 3.72 | 0.90 | 0.39 |
| 6 | 1 (30) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 2.50 | 1.80 | 1.39 | 2.71 |
| 7 | -1 (10) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (2.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 5.40 | 4.76 | 1.14 | 1.36 |
| 8 | 1 (30) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (2.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 5.83 | 2.76 | 2.11 | 2.06 |
| 9 | -1 (10) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 3.32 | 3.50 | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 1 (30) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 2.49 | 2.15 | 1.16 | 1.49 |
| 11 | -1 (10) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1.04 | 3.25 | 0.32 | 0.14 |
| 12 | 1 (30) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.0) | 3.13 | 2.14 | 1.46 | 2.46 |
| 13 | -1 (10) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 0.78 | 2.83 | 0.27 | 2.31 |
| 14 | 1 (30) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | -1 (0.5) | 12.52 | 1.51 | 8.29 | 4.63 |
| 15 | -1 (10) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (1.0) | -1 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 2.89 | 2.74 | 1.06 | 1.36 |
| 16 | 1 (30) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 5.36 | 3.15 | 1.70 | 2.05 |
| 17 | 0 (20) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (1.0) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 3.32 | 1.93 | 1.72 | 1.43 |
| 18 | 0 (20) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (1.0) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 2.33 | 2.08 | 1.12 | 1.43 |
| 19 | 0 (20) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (1.0) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 4.22 | 2.54 | 1.66 | 1.43 |
| 20 | 0 (20) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (1.0) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 0 (0.5) | 2.53 | 2.03 | 1.25 | 1.43 |
the coded variables xi are defined in Table 1.
Observed biotin production stands for the experimental data.
Estimated effects, t-statistics and significance probability of the model for biotin production by Candida sp. LEB 130.
| Effects | Std. Err. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interception | 2.84 | 0.06 | 46.92 | 0.0000 |
| (1) Sucrose | -1.50 | 0.07 | -11.10 | 0.002 |
| (2) Ammonium tartrate | 0.67 | 0.07 | 4.96 | 0.02 |
| (3) KH2PO4 | -0.21 | 0.07 | -1.54 | 0.22 |
| (4) MgSO4
| -0.71 | 0.07 | -5.24 | 0.01 |
| (5) Ferric Citrate | 0.39 | 0.07 | 2.91 | 0.06 |
| (6) ZnSO4 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 1.75 | 0.18 |
Significant factors (p ≤ 0.10).
Estimated effects, t-statistics and significance probability of the model for riboflavin production.
| Effects | Std. Err. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interception | 3.36 | 0.19 | 17.45 | 0.0004 |
| (1) Sucrose | 1.82 | 0.22 | 4.22 | 0.02 |
| (2) Ammonium tartrate | -0.41 | 0.22 | -0.96 | 0.41 |
| (3) KH2PO4
| 2.81 | 0.22 | 6.51 | 0.01 |
| (4) MgSO4
| 1.03 | 0.22 | 2.39 | 0.097 |
| (5) Ferric Citrate | -0.91 | 0.22 | -2.11 | 0.13 |
| (6) ZnSO4
| -1.35 | 0.22 | -3.15 | 0.05 |
Significant factors (p ≤ 0.10).
Estimated effects, t-statistics and significance probability of the model for both vitamin production ratio produced by Candida sp. LEB 130.
| Effects | Std. Err. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interception | 1.43 | 0.07 | 21.36 | 0.000 |
| (1) Sucrose | 1.51 | 0.07 | 10.10 | 0.002 |
| (2) Ammonium tartrate | -0.80 | 0.07 | -5.39 | 0.013 |
| (3) KH2PO4
| 1.37 | 0.07 | 9.19 | 0.003 |
| (4) MgSO4 | 0.96 | 0.07 | 6.42 | 0.008 |
| (5) Ferric Citrate | -0.81 | 0.07 | -5.45 | 0.012 |
| (6) ZnSO4 | -0.96 | 0.07 | -6.46 | 0.008 |
Significant factors (p ≤ 0.01).