| Literature DB >> 24031607 |
Maíra F Nunes1, Marcela B da Cunha-Santino, Irineu Bianchini.
Abstract
Enzymatic activity during decomposition is extremely important to hydrolyze molecules that are assimilated by microorganisms. During aquatic macrophytes decomposition, enzymes act mainly in the breakdown of lignocellulolytic matrix fibers (i.e. cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) that encompass the refractory fraction from organic matter. Considering the importance of enzymatic activities role in decomposition processes, this study aimed to describe the temporal changes of xylanase and cellulose activities during anaerobic decomposition of Ricciocarpus natans (freely-floating), Oxycaryum cubense (emergent) and Cabomba furcata (submersed). The aquatic macrophytes were collected in Óleo Lagoon, Luiz Antonio, São Paulo, Brazil and bioassays were accomplished. Decomposition chambers from each species (n = 10) were set up with dried macrophyte fragments and filtered Óleo Lagoon water. The chambers were incubated at 22.5°C, in the dark and under anaerobic conditions. Enzymatic activities and remaining organic matter were measured periodically during 90 days. The temporal variation of enzymes showed that C. furcata presented the highest decay and the highest maximum enzyme production. Xylanase production was higher than cellulase production for the decomposition of the three aquatic macrophytes species.Entities:
Keywords: anaerobic decomposition; aquatic macrophytes; cellulase; xylanase
Year: 2011 PMID: 24031607 PMCID: PMC3768909 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000100010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Temporal organic matter decay for the three studied species and mathematical modeling applied.
Figure 2Temporal variation and standard deviation of cellulase (▪) and xylanase (□) production during anaerobic decomposition of R. natans, O. cubense and C. furcata.
Parameters obtained from kinetic model for accumulated enzyme production, where: Emax= maximum enzyme production, E = error, kP= enzyme production coefficient and D½ = doubling-time.
| Emax (mol min−1ml−1g−1) | E | kP (day−1) | E | D½ (days) | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.148 | 0.059 | 0.632 | 2.362 | 1.10 | 0.96 | |
| 0.995 | 0.303 | 0.058 | 0.049 | 12.02 | 0.99 | |
| 0.107 | 0.121 | 0.030 | 0.073 | 22.78 | 0.98 | |
| 1.677 | 0.073 | 0.165 | 0.031 | 4.21 | 0.96 | |
| 11.301 | 0.304 | 0.057 | 0.004 | 12.06 | 0.99 | |
| 1.679 | 0.064 | 0.061 | 0.007 | 11.41 | 0.98 | |
Parameters obtained from organic matter decay model, where POML= labile fraction of organic matter; kT = Global decay coefficient (labile fraction mineralization coefficient + leaching coefficient); POMR= refractory fraction of organic matter; kR = refractory fraction mineralization coefficient; t½ = half-time; E = error.
| (POMLS) (%) | E | kT (day−1) | E | t½ (day) | (POMR) (%) | E | kR (day−1) | E | t½ (day) | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 0.9 | 1.31 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 94.8 | 0.4 | 0.0021 | 0.0001 | 330 | 0.99 | |
| 27.8 | 4.9 | 0.61 | 0.28 | 1.14 | 70 | 2.9 | 0.0027 | 0.0010 | 259 | 0.92 | |
| 12.1 | 3.4 | 1.41 | 1.16 | 0.49 | 87.9 | 1.6 | 0.0016 | 0.0005 | 433 | 0.86 |