| Literature DB >> 24031706 |
L Sciessere1, M B Cunha-Santino, I Bianchini.
Abstract
Due to the connection between enzymatic activity and degradation of different fractions of organic matter, enzyme assays can be used to estimate degradation rates of particulate and dissolved organic carbon in freshwater systems. The aim of this study was to quantify and model the enzymatic degradation involving the decomposition of macrophytes, describing temporal activity of cellulases (EC 3.2.1.4 and EC 3.2.1.91) and xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) during in situ decomposition of three aquatic macrophytes (Salvinia sp., Eichhornia azurea and Cyperus giganteus) on the surface and water-sediment interface (w-s interface) of an oxbow lagoon (Óleo lagoon) within a natural Brazilian Savanna Reserve. Overall, the enzymatic degradation of aquatic macrophytes in Óleo lagoon occurred during the whole year and was initiated together with leaching. Xylanase production was ca. 5 times higher than cellulase values due to easy access to this compound by cellulolytic microorganisms. Enzymatic production and detritus mass decay were similar on the surface and w-s interface. Salvinia sp. was the most recalcitrant detritus, with low mass decay and enzymatic activity. E. azurea and C. giganteus decomposition rates and enzymatic production were high and similar. Due to the physicochemical homogeneity observed in the Óleo lagoon, the differences between the decay rates of each species are mostly related with detritus chemical quality.Entities:
Keywords: enzymes; litterbags; mass decay; particulate organic matter
Year: 2011 PMID: 24031706 PMCID: PMC3768756 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000300009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Physicochemical parameters of Óleo lagoon
| pH | EC mS.cm-1 | Tmax °C | Tmin °C | DOmax mg.L-1 | DOmin mg.L-1 | DOC mg.L-1 | Nt mg.L-1 | Pt mg.L-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| surface | |||||||||
| P1 | 5.3 | 0.008 | 25.6 | 17.4 | 5.45 | 0.8 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.02 |
| P2 | 5.1 | 0.006 | 26.6 | 18.8 | 6.67 | 1.43 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 0.03 |
| P3 | 5.3 | 0.006 | 27.8 | 18.6 | 7.7 | 0.87 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.03 |
| w-s interface | |||||||||
| P1 | 5.4 | 0.014 | 24.7 | 17.6 | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.03 |
| P2 | 5.6 | 0.079 | 24.5 | 17.4 | 1.89 | 0.05 | 7.6 | 0.9 | 0.03 |
| P3 | 5.4 | 0.059 | 24.9 | 17.6 | 2.91 | 0.12 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.03 |
where: EC = electrical conductivity, T max = maximum temperature, T min = minimum temperature, DOmax = maximum dissolved oxygen, DOmin = minimum dissolved oxygen, DOC = dissolved organic carbon, Nt = total nitrogen, Pt = total phosphorus.
Figure 1Temporal remaining detritus decay for Salvinia sp., E. azurea and C. giganteus and mathematical modeling applied.
Parameters obtained from organic matter decay model.
| POMLS (%) | E | kt (day-1) | E | t1/2 (day) | POMR (%) | E | kR (day-1) | E | t1/2 (day) | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface | |||||||||||
| 40.6 | 4.0 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 3.15 | 57.8 | 2.7 | 0.001 | 0.0002 | 693 | 0.97 | |
| 11.2 | 4.9 | 1.27 | 1.56 | 0.55 | 88.7 | 2.5 | 0.002 | 0.0002 | 346 | 0.96 | |
| 15.3 | 3.4 | 0.57 | 0.32 | 1.22 | 85.7 | 2.2 | 0.003 | 0.0001 | 231 | 0.98 | |
| Sediment-water interface | |||||||||||
| 43.1 | 8.1 | 0.22 | 0.1 | 3.15 | 55.8 | 5.1 | 0.0005 | 0.0002 | 1386 | 0.83 | |
| 14.8 | 3.8 | 0.70 | 0.4 | 0.99 | 84.8 | 2.36 | 0.002 | 0.0002 | 346 | 0.97 | |
| 25.7 | 3.3 | 0.33 | 0.0001 | 2.10 | 75.4 | 2.38 | 0.003 | 0.0002 | 231 | 0.98 | |
where: POMLS= labile fraction of organic matter; kt = Global decay coefficient (labile fraction mineralization coefficient + leaching coefficient); POMR= refractory fraction of organic matter; kR = refractory fraction mineralization coefficient; t½ = half-time; E = error.
Figure 2Temporal variation and standard deviation of cellu lase and xylanase (surface and water-sediment interface) production during decomposition of Salvinia sp., E. azurea and C. giganteus.
Parameters obtained from kinetic model for accumulated cellulose and xylanase production.
| Emax (mol min-1mL-1g-1) | E | kp (day-1) | E | D1/2 (day) | r2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulase | ||||||
| 0.01 | 0.0005 | 0.02 | 0.006 | 35 | 0.93 | |
| 0.01 | 0.0000007 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 69 | 0.97 | |
| 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 69 | 0,95 | |
| 0.02 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 139 | 0.96 | |
| 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.14 | 0.050 | 5 | 0.86 | |
| 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.004 | 69 | 0.84 | |
| Xilanase | ||||||
| 0.05 | 0.0029 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 69 | 0.96 | |
| 0.07 | 0.0102 | 0.04 | 0.001 | 17 | 0.97 | |
| 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.060 | 35 | 0.80 | |
| 0.12 | 0.014 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 69 | 0.87 | |
| 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.13 | 0.050 | 5 | 0.83 | |
| 0.14 | 0.009 | 0.13 | 0.050 | 5 | 0.83 | |
where: Emax= maximum enzyme production, E = error, kP = enzyme production coefficient and D½ = doubling-time.
Cellulose and hemicellulose initial and final content (%) of Salvinia sp., E. azurea and C. giganteus.
| Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| initial | ||
| 32 | 26 | |
| 43 | 33 | |
| 57 | 26 | |
| final | ||
| 31 | 36 | |
| w-s interface | 32 | 36 |
| 32 | 33 | |
| w-s interface | 34 | 21 |
| 38 | 36 | |
| w-s interface | 36 | 32 |