| Literature DB >> 24031516 |
Norma Suely Evangelista-Barreto1, Fatima Cristiane Teles de Carvalho, Regine Helena S Dos Fernandes Vieira, Cristhiane Moura Falavina Dos Reis, Andrew Macrae, Dália Dos Prazeres Rodrigues.
Abstract
Thirty water samples were collected, at two week intervals, from the estuary of the River Cocó. The aim was to characterize the presence, distribution and types of Aeromonas spp, in the estuary of the River Cocó, Ceara, Brazil (03°46'28.83''S e 38°26'36.52''S). Aeromonas were identified in 19 (63%) samples analyzed by plating and CFU counts. Presence/absence tests were positive for 11 (37%) of the samples resulting in the detection of Aeromonas in a total of 23 (77%) of samples. CFU counts varied from < 10 to 1.4 x 10(4) CFU mL(-1). From the isolated strains seven species of Aeromonas were identified: A. caviae (29/69), A. veronii bv. sobria (13/69), A. veronii bv. veronii (8/69), A. trota (6/69), A. media (5/69), A. sobria (4/69) and A. hydrophila and Aeromonas sp. (2/69). Of the 38 strains tested, 23 (60%) showed resistance to at least one of the eight antimicrobials. Multiple resistance to antibiotics was observed in A. caviae, A. media , A. sóbria and A. veronii bv. sobria. Aeromonas caviae showed the highest multiple resistance, being resistant to four antibiotics. The presence of those microorganisms may contribute to the occurrence of gastroenteritis, mainly in children, since they are considered opportunists.Entities:
Keywords: Aeromonas; Antibiotics; Estuary
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031516 PMCID: PMC3768692 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220100002000027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Quantification of Aeromonas species from the Cocó River estuary (Fortaleza, Brazil) by presence/absence (P/A) and direct plating (CFU mL-1) methods
| Collect | P/A | CFU/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1° | A | - | 1.4 x 104 | As, Avs |
| 2° | A | - | 1.2 x 104 | Avs, Ac |
| 3° | A | - | 1.7 x 103 | Ac |
| 4° | P | Avs, Ac | < 10 | Ah, Avs |
| 5° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 6° | P | Avv | 3.2 x 103 | Avs |
| 7° | A | - | 2.9 x 103 | As |
| 8° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 9° | P | Ac, Avs | 1,0 x 103 | Ac |
| 10° | A | - | 5.0 x 102 | Avs |
| 11° | A | - | 2.1 x 103 | Ac |
| 12° | A | - | 3.3 x 102 | Am, Ac |
| 13° | P | Ac, At | 3.5 x 102 | Ac, Avs |
| 14° | P | Asp, At, Ac | < 10 | - |
| 15° | A | - | 1,6 x 102 | Avv |
| 16° | A | - | 3.0 x 102 | Ac, At |
| 17° | P | Ac | 1.7 x 102 | Avv, Ac |
| 18° | P | Ac, At | < 10 | - |
| 19° | A | - | 2.1 x 103 | Ac |
| 20° | P | Avv | < 10 | - |
| 21° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 22° | P | Ah | < 10 | - |
| 23° | P | Avs | < 10 | Asp |
| 24° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 25° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 26° | A | - | 9.9 x 102 | Ac, Avs |
| 27° | A | - | < 10 | Am |
| 28° | A | - | < 10 | - |
| 29° | P | Ac | < 10 | Am |
| 30° | A | - | < 10 | - |
Ac (Aeromonas caviae), Am (A. media), As (A. sobriaM), Asp (Aeromonas sp.), At (A. trota), Avs (A. veronii bv. sobria), Avv (A. veronii bv. veronii) and Ah (A. hydrophila).
Percentage of Aeromonas isolated from the Cocó River estuary (Fortaleza, Brazil), by presence/absence (P/A) and direct plating (CFU mL-1) methods.
| Species | P/A (%) | CFU mL-1 (%) | Total identified strains (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 (46) | 17 (40) | 29 (42) | |
| 01 (04) | 01 (02) | 02 (03) | |
| no detected | 05 (12) | 05 (07) | |
| no detected | 04 (09) | 04 (06) | |
| 05 (19) | 01 (02) | 06 (09) | |
| 03 (12) | 10 (23) | 13 (19) | |
| 04 (15) | 04 (09) | 08 (11) | |
| 01 (04) | 01 (02) | 02 (03) | |
| Total | 26 (100) | 43 (100) | 69 (100) |
Antibiotics susceptibility of Aeromonas spp strains isolated from from estuary of the Cocó river (Fortaleza, Brazil).
| N° (%) susceptible to | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | TE | F | AK | CIP | CRO | SXT | C | NA |
| A. caviae (n=13) | 12(92) | 13(100) | 12(92) | 13(100) | 13(100) | 02(15) | 13(100) | 11(85) |
| 01(33) | 03(100) | 03(100) | 03(100) | 03(100) | 0,0(0) | 03(100) | 03(100) | |
| 02(100) | 02(100) | 01(50) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 01(50) | 02(100) | 01(50) | |
| 02(100) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 02(100) | 01(50) | |
| 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 03(75) | 04(100) | 04(100) | |
| 09(90) | 10(100) | 10(100) | 10(100) | 10(100) | 08(80) | 10(100) | 09(90) | |
| 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 04(100) | 02(50) | 04(100) | 04(100) | |
| Total (n=38) | 34(89) | 38(100) | 36(95) | 38(10) | 38(100) | 18(47) | 38(100) | 33(87) |
Tetracycline (TE), nitrofurantoin (F), cephalothin (KF), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ceftriaxone (CRO), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (STX), chloramphenicol (C) and nalidixic acid (NA)
n = number of strains tested
Physical-chemical (temperature, pH e salinity) parameters determined from 30 water samples in the estuary of the Cocó river, Brazil.
| Samples | Temperature (°C) | pH | Salinity (‰) | Samples | Temperature °C) | pH | Salinity (‰) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 32 | 6.7 | no detected | 16a | 28 | 6.9 | 32 |
| 2a | 29 | 7.4 | 1.0 | 17a | 30 | 7.6 | 17 |
| 3a | 30 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 18a | 29 | 7.8 | 15 |
| 4a | 29 | 6.8 | 18 | 19a | 27.5 | 7.3 | 20 |
| 5a | 30 | 8.0 | 35 | 20a | 29 | 7.6 | 28 |
| 6a | 28 | 7.5 | 34 | 21a | 30 | 7.2 | 27 |
| 7a | 28 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 22a | 27 | 7.7 | 25 |
| 8a | 28 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 23a | 31 | 7.5 | 29 |
| 9a | 29 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 24a | 31 | 8.0 | 20 |
| 10a | 30 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 25a | 32 | 7.0 | 24 |
| 11a | 28 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 26a | 28 | 7.4 | 12 |
| 12a | 29 | 7.0 | no detected | 27a | 27.5 | 7.5 | 36 |
| 13a | 27 | 7.3 | 8.0 | 28a | 30 | 7.4 | 33 |
| 14a | 31.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 29a | 31 | 7.5 | 25 |
| 15a | 28 | 7.2 | 22 | 30a | 30 | 7.9 | 20 |