| Literature DB >> 24031486 |
Erick Aniszewski1, Raquel Silva Peixoto, Fábio Faria Mota, Selma Gomes Ferreira Leite, Alexandre Soares Rosado.
Abstract
The contamination of ecosystems with heavy metals is an important issue in current world and remediation technologies should be in according to environmental sustainability concept. Bioemulsifier are promising agents to be used in metal removal and could be effective to many applications in environmental industries. The aims of this work was screening the potential production of bioemulsifier by microorganisms isolated from an oil contaminated mangrove, and evaluate cadmium and zinc removal potential of those strains from a hazardous industrial residue. From that, bioemulsifier-producing bacteria were isolated from urban mangrove sediments. Four isolates were identified as Microbacterium sp by 16S rRNA analysis and were able to reduce up to 53.3% of culture medium surface tension (TS) when using glucose as carbon and energy source and 20.2% when sucrose was used. Suspensions containing bioemulsifier produced by Microbacterium sp. strains show to be able to remove cadmium and zinc from contaminated industrial residue, and its ability varied according carbon source. Significant differences in metal removal were observed by all strains depending on the carbon source. When glucose was used, Cd and Zn removal varied from 17 to 41%, and 14 to 68%, respectively. However, when sucrose was used it was observed only 4 to a maximum of 15% of Cd removal, and 4 to 17% of Zn removal. When the same tests were performed after ethanol precipitation, the results were different: the percentages of removal of Zn (7-27%) and Cd (14-32%) were higher from sucrose cultures. This is the first report of heavy metals removal by bioemulsifier from Microbacterium sp.Entities:
Keywords: Bioremediation; Biosemulsifier; Microbacterium; cadmium; heavy metals; zinc
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031486 PMCID: PMC3768605 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220100001000033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Consensus phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between four isolated strains and fifty-six Microbacterium species based on 16S rDNA sequences. Bootstrap analyses were performed with 1000 repetitions and only values higher than 50 are shown.
Figure 2Visual emulsion values of each strain in each carbon source observed after 3 to 10 days of incubation.
Surface tension (ST) of culture media after growth of isolates in minimal medium with 2% glucose, 2% sucrose or TSB as the carbon source for four days at 28°C and 200 rpm
| Microbacterium strains | Final ST (Dyn/cm) Sucrose | ST Reduction Sucrose | Final ST (Dyn/cm) Glucose | ST Reduction Glucose | Final ST (Dyn/cm) TSB | ST Reduction TSB(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mc 1 | 49.2 | 20.2 | 50.1 | 16.5 | 50.1 | 2.3 |
| Mc 6B | 52 | 15.7 | 53.9 | 10.1 | 48.3 | 5.8 |
| Mc60 | 51 | 17.3 | 56 | 6.7 | 53.3 | 0 |
| Mc24 | 52 | 15.7 | 54.2 | 9.7 | 52.1 | 0 |
-Inicial medium TS in sucrose analyzes= 61.7 Dyn/cm.
-Inicial medium TS in glucose analyzes= 60 Dyn/cm.
-Inicial medium TS in TSB analyzes= 51.3 Dyn/cm.
Released Cadmium (Cd) concentration from industrial residue and percentage of removal by bioemulsifier suspension produced by Microbacterium strains Mc1, Mc6b, Mc 24 and Mc 60 using 2% glucose or 2% sucrose as carbon source in minimal culture media (mean and standard deviation of three replicas per treatment) with or without an ethanol precipitation step.
| Strain | Glucose(carbon source) | Glucose(carbon source) | Sucrose(carbon source) | Sucrose(carbon source) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without ethanol precipitation step | With ethanol precipitation step | Without ethanol precipitation step | With ethanol precipitation step | |||||
| Relesead Cd concentration (mg/kg) | Cd removal (%) | Relesead Cd concentration (mg/kg) | Cd removal (%) | Relesead Cd concentration (mg/kg) | Cd removal (%) | Relesead Cd concentration (mg/kg) | Cd removal (%) | |
| Mc 1 | 34.30 ± 2.40 | 23 | 37.41 ± 2.55 | 25 | 22.00 ± 1.84 | 15 | 30.32 ± 1.41 | 20 |
| Mc 6b | 62.10 ± 2.97 | 41 | 30.26 ± 1.33 | 20 | 23.00 ± 0.71 | 15 | 48.36 ± 1.95 | 32 |
| Mc 24 | 30.90 ± 2.12 | 21 | 31.45 ± 2.05 | 21 | 5.60 ± 2.01 | 4 | 40.03 ± 0.86 | 27 |
| Mc 60 | 26.20 ± 1.13 | 17 | 34.50 ± 2.32 | 23 | 2.70 ± 1.70 | 2 | 21.73 ± 2.14 | 14 |
| PA | 9.03 ± 2.79 | 6 | nc | nc | 37.30 ± 4.29 | 25 | nc | nc |
Positive control= Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA
The contaminated industrial residue concentration of cadmium were 175.2 mg/kg (total) and 31.7 mg/kg (soluble) and of zinc were 22294.4 mg/kg (total) and 1755 mg/kg (soluble).
nc = Data not collected
Released Zinc (Zn) concentration from industrial residue and percentage of removal by bioemulsifier suspension produced by Microbacterium strains Mc1, Mc6b, Mc 24 and Mc 60 using 2% glucose or 2% sucrose as carbon source in minimal culture media (mean and standard deviation of three replicas per treatment) with or without an ethanol precipitation step.
| Strain | Glucose (carbon source) | Glucose(carbon source) | Sucrose (carbon source) | Sucrose (carbon source) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without ethanol precipitation step | With ethanol precipitation step | Without ethanol precipitation step | With ethanol precipitation step | |||||
| Relesead Zn concentration (mg/kg) | Zn removal (%) | Relesead Zn concentration (mg/kg) | Zn removal (%) | Relesead Zn concentration (mg/kg) | Zn removal (%) | Relesead Zn concentration (mg/kg) | Zn removal (%) | |
| Mc 1 | 14309.50 ± 2307.32 | 68 | 3477.41 ± 772.58 | 16 | 828.50 ± 87.47 | 4 | 2367.54 ± 657.14 | 11 |
| Mc 6b | 2860.37 ± 592.25 | 14 | 2756.41 ± 300.15 | 13 | 1555.00 ± 362.22 | 7 | 5715.79 ± 183.90 | 27 |
| Mc 24 | 4280.00 ± 395.47 | 20 | 3084.13 ± 68.31 | 15 | 3556.25 ± 326.19 | 17 | 4370.41 ± 262.28 | 21 |
| Mc 60 | 6303.75 ± 460.21 | 30 | 3685.20 ± 103.66 | 17 | 1861.25 ± 21.93 | 9 | 1490.29 ± 389.25 | 7 |
| PA | 12775.00 ± 2662.78 | 60 | nc | nc | 4927.50 ± 1470.78 | 23 | nc | nc |
Positive control= Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA
The contaminated industrial residue concentration of cadmium were 175.2 mg/kg (total) and 31.7 mg/kg (soluble) and of zinc were 22294.4 mg/kg (total) and 1755 mg/kg (soluble).
nc = Data not collected
t-Test to evaluated differences between removal by bioemulsifier suspension produced by Microbacterium strains Mc1, Mc6b, Mc 24 and Mc 60 using 2% glucose or 2% sucrose as carbon source in minimal culture media (mean and standard deviation of three replicas per treatment) with or without an ethanol precipitation step.
| Strain | Removal of cadmium Without ethanol precipitation step(Glucose x sucrose) | Removal of zinc Without ethanol precipitation step (Glucose x sucrose) | Removal of cadmium With ethanol precipitation step(Glucose x sucrose) | Removal of zinc With ethanol precipitation step(Glucose x sucrose) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mc 1 | 0.07 | 0.000001 | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Mc 6b | 0.000005 | 0.016 | 0.0007 | 0.003 |
| Mc 24 | 0.00004 | 0.14 | 0.001 | 0.027 |
| Mc 60 | 0.0003 | 0.0049 | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| PA | 0.0001 | 0.0005 | nc | nc |
Significant (p<0,05)
Figure 3Variation of Cadmium (Cd) and Zinc (Zn) removal percentage from industrial residue by biosurfactant suspension produced by Microbacterium strains Mc1, Mc6b, Mc 24 and Mc 60 using 2% glucose or 2% sucrose as carbon source in minimal culture medium (mean and standard deviation of three replicas per treatment) with or without an ethanol precipitation step.