Literature DB >> 12788727

Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and contaminated arid Southwestern soils.

Adria A Bodour1, Kevin P Drees, Raina M Maier.   

Abstract

Biosurfactants are a unique class of compounds that have been shown to have a variety of potential applications in the remediation of organic- and metal-contaminated sites, in the enhanced transport of bacteria, in enhanced oil recovery, as cosmetic additives, and in biological control. However, little is known about the distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in the environment. The goal of this study was to determine how common culturable surfactant-producing bacteria are in undisturbed and contaminated sites. A series of 20 contaminated (i.e., with metals and/or hydrocarbons) and undisturbed soils were collected and plated on R(2)A agar. The 1,305 colonies obtained were screened for biosurfactant production in mineral salts medium containing 2% glucose. Forty-five of the isolates were positive for biosurfactant production, representing most of the soils tested. The 45 isolates were grouped by using repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP)-PCR analysis, which yielded 16 unique isolates. Phylogenetic relationships were determined by comparing the 16S rRNA gene sequence of each unique isolate with known sequences, revealing one new biosurfactant-producing microbe, a Flavobacterium sp. Sequencing results indicated only 10 unique isolates (in comparison to the REP analysis, which indicated 16 unique isolates). Surface tension results demonstrated that isolates that were similar according to sequence analysis but unique according to REP analysis in fact produced different surfactant mixtures under identical growth conditions. These results suggest that the 16S rRNA gene database commonly used for determining phylogenetic relationships may miss diversity in microbial products (e.g., biosurfactants and antibiotics) that are made by closely related isolates. In summary, biosurfactant-producing microorganisms were found in most soils even by using a relatively limited screening assay. Distribution was dependent on soil conditions, with gram-positive biosurfactant-producing isolates tending to be from heavy metal-contaminated or uncontaminated soils and gram-negative isolates tending to be from hydrocarbon-contaminated or cocontaminated soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788727      PMCID: PMC161513          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3280-3287.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Cyclic lipoundecapeptide tensin from Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 96.578.

Authors:  A Henriksen; U Anthoni; T H Nielsen; J Sørensen; C Christophersen; M Gajhede
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.

Authors:  W G Weisburg; S M Barns; D A Pelletier; D J Lane
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Purification and Characterization of Liposan, a Bioemulsifier from Candida lipolytica.

Authors:  M C Cirigliano; G M Carman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Mycobacterial lipids: a historical perspective.

Authors:  J Asselineau; G Lanéelle
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  1998-10-01

5.  Molecular genetics of biosurfactant production

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  S S Branda; J E González-Pastor; S Ben-Yehuda; R Losick; R Kolter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effect of a Pseudomonas rhamnolipid biosurfactant on cell hydrophobicity and biodegradation of octadecane.

Authors:  Y Zhang; R M Miller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Rhamnolipid surfactant production affects biofilm architecture in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1.

Authors:  Mary E Davey; Nicky C Caiazza; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Biosurfactants from Bacillus licheniformis: structural analysis and characterization.

Authors:  K Jenny; O Käppeli; A Fiechter
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Novel bioemulsifiers from microorganisms for use in foods.

Authors:  R Shepherd; J Rockey; I W Sutherland; S Roller
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1995-06-21       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  46 in total

1.  Production of biosurfactant on crude date syrup under saline conditions by entrapped cells of Natrialba sp. strain E21, an extremely halophilic bacterium isolated from a solar saltern (Ain Salah, Algeria).

Authors:  Salima Kebbouche-Gana; Mohamed Lamine Gana; Imen Ferrioune; Souad Khemili; Nesrine Lenchi; Sihem Akmouci-Toumi; Nabila Amel Bouanane-Darenfed; Nacer-Eddine Djelali
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Screening and Identification of Lipopeptide Biosurfactants Produced by Two Aerobic Endospore-Forming Bacteria Isolated from Mfabeni Peatland, South Africa.

Authors:  Folasade A Adu; Charles H Hunter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Isolation of surfactant-resistant bacteria from natural, surfactant-rich marine habitats.

Authors:  Craig J Plante; Kieran M Coe; Rebecca G Plante
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bacterial community composition of biological degreasing systems and health risk assessment for workers.

Authors:  Delphine Boucher; Jean Baptiste Laffaire; Faouzi Jaziri; Christine David; Corinne Biderre-Petit; Philippe Duquenne; Eric Peyretaillade; Pierre Peyret
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Screening of biosurfactant-producing bacteria from offshore oil and gas platforms in North Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Qinhong Cai; Baiyu Zhang; Bing Chen; Xing Song; Zhiwen Zhu; Tong Cao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Unexplored Brazilian oceanic island host high salt tolerant biosurfactant-producing bacterial strains.

Authors:  Fábio Sérgio Paulino da Silva; Victor Satler Pylro; Pericles Leonardo Fernandes; Gisele Souza Barcelos; Karlos Henrique Martins Kalks; Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud Schaefer; Marcos Rogério Tótola
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Development and Genetic Engineering of Hyper-Producing Microbial Strains for Improved Synthesis of Biosurfactants.

Authors:  Abdullahi Adekilekun Jimoh; Tosin Yetunde Senbadejo; Rasheed Adeleke; Johnson Lin
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Active depinning of bacterial droplets: The collective surfing of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Marc Hennes; Julien Tailleur; Gaëlle Charron; Adrian Daerr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Isolation and functional characterization of a biosurfactant produced by a new and promising strain of Oleomonas sagaranensis AT18.

Authors:  Atipan Saimmai; Onkamon Rukadee; Theerawat Onlamool; Vorasan Sobhon; Suppasil Maneerat
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Adsorption of hydroxamate siderophores and EDTA on goethite in the presence of the surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate.

Authors:  Naraya Carrasco; Ruben Kretzschmar; Jide Xu; Stephan M Kraemer
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.