| Literature DB >> 24031430 |
Junpei Zhou1, Ying Huang, Minghe Mo.
Abstract
Phylogenetic composition of bacterial community in soil of a karst forest was analyzed by culture-independent molecular approach. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified directly from soil DNA and cloned to generate a library. After screening the clone library by RFLP, 16S rRNA genes of representative clones were sequenced and the bacterial community was analyzed phylogenetically. The 16S rRNA gene inserts of 190 clones randomly selected were analyzed by RFLP and generated 126 different RFLP types. After sequencing, 126 non-chimeric sequences were obtained, generating 113 phylotypes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the bacteria distributed in soil of the karst forest included the members assigning into Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Chloroflexi (Green nonsulfur bacteria), Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Nitrospirae, Actinobacteria (High G+C Gram-positive bacteria), Firmicutes (Low G+C Gram-positive bacteria) and candidate divisions (including the SPAM and GN08).Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Characterization; Purification; bacteria; karst forest
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031430 PMCID: PMC3768593 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090004000013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Distribution of clones and RFLP types or sequences from soil of karst forest
| Putative phylogenetic affiliation | No. of clones | % of clones | No. of sequences | % of sequences | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 69 | 36.4 | 47 | 37.2 | 89-99 |
| 1.1 | 19 | 10.0 | 11 | 8.7 | 91-99 |
| 1.2 | 17 | 9.0 | 12 | 9.5 | 92-99 |
| 1.3 | 18 | 9.5 | 13 | 10.3 | 94-99 |
| 1.4 | 15 | 7.9 | 11 | 8.7 | 89-99 |
| 2. | 45 | 23.7 | 26 | 20.6 | 90-98 |
| 3. | 22 | 11.6 | 13 | 10.3 | 87-96 |
| 4. | 20 | 10.5 | 14 | 11.1 | 90-99 |
| 5. | 5 | 2.6 | 4 | 3.2 | 85-93 |
| 6. | 7 | 3.7 | 6 | 4.8 | 94-98 |
| 7. | 6 | 3.2 | 6 | 4.8 | 91-97 |
| 8. | 7 | 3.5 | 5 | 4.0 | 95-98 |
| 9. | 2 | 1.1 | 2 | 1.6 | 95-97 |
| 10. | 7 | 3.7 | 3 | 2.4 | 89-99 |
Closest relatives as determined by the BLAST method.
Each sequence representing a single RFLP type. S: The sequence similarity to its closest relatives.
Figure 116S rRNA gene-based dendrogram showing phylogenetic relationships of bacterial phylotypes from karst forest soil (shown in bold) to members of the Proteobacteria from public database. Bootstrap values (n=1000 replicates) of ≥50% are reported as percentages. The scale bar represents the number of changes per nucleotide position. Thermosipho sp. MV1063 (AJ419874) was used as outgroup. Sequences of RFLP types differing only slightly (≤3%) are shown in parentheses. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence.
Figure 216S rRNA gene-based dendrogram showing phylogenetic relationships of bacterial phylotypes from karst forest soil (shown in bold) to members of the Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes from public database. Bootstrap values (n=1000 replicates) of ≥50% are reported as percentages. The scale bar represents the number of changes per nucleotide position. Thermosipho sp. MV1063 (AJ419874) was used as outgroup. Sequences of RFLP types differing only slightly (≤3%) are shown in parentheses. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence.
Figure 316S rRNA gene-based dendrogram showing phylogenetic relationships of bacterial phylotypes from karst forest soil (shown in bold) to members of the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi and Candidate divisions from public database. Bootstrap values (n=1000 replicates) of ≥50% are reported as percentages. The scale bar represents the number of changes per nucleotide position. Thermosipho sp. MV1063 (AJ419874) was used as outgroup. Sequences of RFLP types differing only slightly (≤3%) are shown in parentheses. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence.
Distribution of bacteria in forest soils investigated by molecular method
| Putative phylogenetic affiliation | % of clones from forests with different vegetations and in different locations | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spruce in Rothwald, Austria (17) | Spruce in Britsh Columbia, Canada (4) | Spruce in British Columbia, Canada (12) | Pine in Ungaran, Indonesia (24) | Pristine in Western Amazon, Brazil (22) | Pristine in Eastern Amazon, Brazil (6) | Broad-leave in Ailaoshan, China (10) | Broad-leave in Xishuangbanna, China (10) | Quercus in Guizhou, China (this study) | |
| 1. | 45.0 | 46.5 | 55.2 | 54.1 | 30.7 | 12.2 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 36.4 |
| 1.1 | 27.0 | 21.0 | 24.4 | 40.5 | 18.4 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 |
| 1.2 | 6.0 | 11.0 | 19.0 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 1.3 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 9.0 | 4.1 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 9.5 |
| 1.4 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 7.9 | ||
| 2. | 35.0 | 9.0 | 18.8 | 1.4 | 49.0 | 48.0 | 80.0 | 23.7 | |
| 3. | 10.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 11.6 | |
| 4. | 15.0 | 3.1 | 36.5 | 6.1 | 10.5 | ||||
| 5. | 0.5 | 2.6 | |||||||
| 6. | 3.0 | 3.4 | 6.1 | 3.7 | |||||
| 7. | 10.0 | 12.0 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 12.2 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | |
| 8. | 3.5 | ||||||||
| 9. | 0.5 | 4.1 | 22.4 | 1.1 | |||||
| 10. | 18.6 | ||||||||
| 11. | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||
| 12. | 12.5 | 16.4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 24.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.7 | |
| H’ | 1.69 | 2.09 | 1.92 | 1.49 | 1.63 | 1.99 | 1.64 | 0.79 | 2.32 |
H’ (Shannon–Weaver index) was calculated for estimation of bacterial diversity, using phyla as OUT.
Including candidate divisions, unclassified.