| Literature DB >> 24031406 |
Ana Cláudia Paiva Alegre1, Maria de Lourdes Teixeira de Moraes Polizeli, Héctor Francisco Terenzi, João Atílio Jorge, Luis Henrique Souza Guimarães.
Abstract
The filamentous fungus Aspergillus caespitosus was a good producer of intracellular and extracellular invertases under submerged (SbmF) or solid-state fermentation (SSF), using agroindustrial residues, such as wheat bran, as carbon source. The production of extracellular enzyme under SSF at 30°C, for 72h, was enhanced using SR salt solution (1:1, w/v) to humidify the substrate. The extracellular activity under SSF using wheat bran was around 5.5-fold higher than that obtained in SbmF (Khanna medium) with the same carbon source. However, the production of enzyme with wheat bran plus oat meal was 2.2-fold higher than wheat bran isolated. The enzymatic production was affected by supplementation with nitrogen and phosphate sources. The addition of glucose in SbmF and SSF promoted the decreasing of extracellular activity, but the intracellular form obtained in SbmF was enhanced 3-5-fold. The invertase produced in SSF exhibited optimum temperature at 50°C while the extra- and intracellular enzymes produced in SbmF exhibited maximal activities at 60°C. All enzymatic forms exhibited maximal activities at pH 4.0-6.0 and were stable up to 1 hour at 50°C.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus caespitosus; invertase; solid-state fermentation; submerged fermentation; β-D-fructofuranosidase
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031406 PMCID: PMC3768555 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Production of intracellular and extracellular invertases using different culture medium (SbmF) by Aspergillus caespitosus. The culture was maintained in orbital agitation (100 rpm), at 40°C by 72 h. Symbols: (■) intracellular; (□) extracellular. Total U = U/ml x volume of crude extract.
Influence of carbon sources on the production of extracellular and intracellular invertases in submerged fermentation by Aspergillus caespitosus.
| Carbon Source | Invertase Activity (U/ml) | Intracellular Protein (mg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular | Intracellular | ||
| Without | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.08 | 0.1 ± 0.08 |
| Sucrose | 0.6 ± 0.11 | 15.8 ± 5.15 | 0.3 ± 0.07 |
| Glucose | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 6.9 ± 0.20 | 0.2 ± 0.01 |
| Maltose | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.01 |
| Starch | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 1.2 ± 0.13 | 0.2 ± 0.02 |
| Wheat bran | 19.1 ± 0.19 | 4.1 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.02 |
| Oat meal | 6.2 ± 0.67 | 0.7 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 |
| Lactose | 0.8 ± 0.07 | 2.5 ± 0.15 | 0.6 ± 0.01 |
| Crushed Corn | 3.7 ± 1.15 | 1.0 ± 0.33 | 0.3 ± 0.07 |
| Rice straw | 4.2 ± 0.17 | 2.6 ± 1.75 | 1.0 ± 0.48 |
| Raffinose | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 1.7 ± 0.35 | 0.2 ± 0.03 |
| Crushed Corncob | 1.1 ± 0.19 | 0.2 ± 0.08 | 0.3 ± 0.10 |
| Sugar cane bagasse | 2.2 ± 0.11 | 2.9 ± 0.76 | 0.1 ± 0.01 |
| Cassava flour | 0.2 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.1 ± 0.02 |
| Avicel | 0.6 ± 0.16 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.05 |
| Quitin | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.10 |
The fungus was grown in Khanna medium in orbital agitation (100 rpm), for 72 h, at 40°C.
Influence of carbon sources on the production of extracellular invertase in solid-state fermentation by Aspergillus caespitosus.
| Substrate/Carbon source | Invertase Activity (U/g) | Protein (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Wheat bran | 117.4 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 0.7 |
| Oat meal | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.5 |
| Rice straw | 0 | 0 |
| Sugar cane bagasse | 0 | 0 |
| Corncob crushed | 0 | 0 |
| Cassava flour | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| Soy bean bran | 28.3 ± 2.5 | 15.6 ± 1.0 |
| Wheat bran + oat meal (1:1; w/w) | 181.8 ± 4.9 | 17.6 ± 0.7 |
| Wheat bran + cassava flour (1:1; w/w) | 92.1 ± 3.5 | 7.3 ± 0.5 |
| Wheat bran + soybean bran (1:1; w/w) | 179.9 ± 4.2 | 24.3 ± 1.1 |
The substrates were moistened with destilated water (1:1; w/v) and the cultures were maintained on stove at 40°C with 70% of humidity for 72 h. The medium humidity was 70-85%.
Figure 2Effect of glucose on production of invertases in submerged (A) and state-solid (B) fermentations using wheat bran as carbon source. Symbols: (■) intracellular; (□) extracellular.
Influence of temperature and proportion of SR salt solution added in state-solid fermentation on the production of invertase by Aspergillus caespitosus.
| Temperature (°C) | Proportion (w/v) | Relative humidity (%) | Invertase activity (U/g) | Protein (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | 85 | 303.4 ± 7.0 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | |
| 30 | 1:2 | 150 | 245.8 ± 11.4 | 4.2 ± 0.1 |
| 1:4 | 285 | 188.7 ± 37.2 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | |
| 1:1 | 85 | 244.7 ± 13.4 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | |
| 40 | 1:2 | 150 | 244.7 ± 13.8 | 5.9 ± 0.3 |
| 1:4 | 285 | 92.6 ± 7.8 | 9.5 ± 0.2 |
The cultures were maintained on stove with 70% of humidity for 72 h.
Effect of several compounds on the production of invertases from A. caespitosus grown on SbmF and SSF.
| Compounds (1%; w/v) | Invertase Activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SbmF (U/ml) | SSF (U/g) | ||
| Intracellular | Extracellular | Extracellular | |
| Without | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 16.8 ± 0.5 | 245.0 ± 2.1 |
| KH2PO4 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 18.1 ± 0.8 | 219.4 ± 21.4 |
| Na2HPO4 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 17.0 ± 0.6 | 257.2 ± 0.8 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 19.3 ± 1.3 | 200.1 ± 23.5 |
| Peptone | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 14.7 ± 1.7 | 232.9 ± 4.0 |
Figure 3Optima temperature (A), thermal stability at 50°C (B) and optimum pH (C) of activity for intracellular (•) and extracellular (■) invertase produced on SbmF, and extracellular invertase (▲) produced on SSF by Aspergillus caespitosus.