Literature DB >> 24030413

Post-transplant outcomes of children bridged to transplant with the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric ventricular assist device.

Pirooz Eghtesady1, Christopher S D Almond, Christine Tjossem, Deirdre Epstein, Michiaki Imamura, Mark Turrentine, James Tweddell, Robert D B Jaquiss, Charles Canter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric (EXCOR) ventricular assist device improves waiting list survival for pediatric heart transplant candidates. Little is known about their post-transplant outcomes. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether there was a difference in early survival for children bridged to transplant with EXCOR versus status 1A pediatric heart transplant patients not transplanted with ventricular assist device support. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Pediatric heart transplant patients (n=106) bridged to transplantation with EXCOR were compared with a similarly aged cohort (n=1021) within the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) database (both cohorts from May 2007 to December 2010). In the EXCOR group, 12-month post-transplant survival (88.7%) was similar to OPTN patients listed status 1A who were not on ventricular assist device support at transplant (89.3%; P=0.85) and significantly better than 12-month survival in OPTN patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at transplant (60.3%; P<0.001). Rejection (50%) was a significantly (P=0.005) higher cause of 12-month post-transplant mortality in the EXCOR compared with the OPTN group. Death after transplant was also higher in EXCOR patients with congenital heart disease compared with those with cardiomyopathy (26.1% versus 7.2%; P=0.02). Post-transplant survival was similar in EXCOR patients with ≥1 serious adverse event during ventricular assist device support as those without an event during support.
CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month post-transplant survival with EXCOR is comparable with overall pediatric heart transplant survival and superior to survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Neither adverse events during support nor factors associated with mortality during support influence post-transplant survival. Rejection was a significantly greater cause of post-transplant mortality in EXCOR than in OPTN patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; heart-assist device; pediatrics; surgery; transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030413     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Modern Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Brody Wehman; Kristen A Stafford; Gregory J Bittle; Zachary N Kon; Charles F Evans; Keshava Rajagopal; Nicholas Pietris; Sunjay Kaushal; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Epidemiology of Pediatric Heart Failure in the USA-a 15-Year Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Marc Anders; Susan Denfield; Raysa Morales-Demori; Elena Montañes; Gwen Erkonen; Michael Chance
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Early Biventricular Assist Device Use in Children: A Single-Center Review of 31 Patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Deirdre J Epstein; Matthew C Henn; Tracey Guthrie; Richard B Schuessler; Kathleen E Simpson; Charles E Canter; Pirooz Eghtesady; Umar S Boston
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  Current status of third-generation implantable left ventricular assist devices in Japan, Duraheart and HeartWare.

Authors:  Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Selection of Patients for Initial Clinical Trials of Solid Organ Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Martin Wijkstrom; Sundaram Hariharan; Joshua L Chan; Avneesh Singh; Keith Horvath; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Arielle Cimeno; Rolf N Barth; John C LaMattina; Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Current approaches to device implantation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-03-03

Review 7.  Ventricular assist device use in congenital heart disease with a comparison to heart transplant.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.744

8.  Heart Transplantation from Biventricular Support in Infant with Novel SMYD1 Mutation.

Authors:  Garrett N Coyan; Matthew D Zinn; Shawn C West; Mahesh S Sharma
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 9.  An overview of mechanical circulatory support in single-ventricle patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Connor Callahan; Aaron M Abarbanell; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-04

10.  Role of paediatric assist device in bridge to transplant.

Authors:  Roland Hetzer; Mariano Francisco Del Maria Javier; Eva Maria Delmo Walter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.