Literature DB >> 24030288

The functional muscle-bone unit in subjects of varying BMD.

H T Ma1, J F Griffith, L Xu, P C Leung.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: This study used the "functional muscle-bone unit" concept to investigate muscle-bone interaction of the lumbar spine in subjects of varying bone mineral density. It was found that unit bone mass corresponded to a relatively more muscle mass in subjects with reduced bone mineral density, indicating a relatively higher mechanical load from muscles exerted on trabecular bone.
INTRODUCTION: Bone is an architecturally adaptive tissue which responds to mechanical loading. This study is proposed to use "functional muscle-bone unit" to reflect this muscle-bone interaction at spine in subjects with different bone mineral density.
METHODS: The study was carried out in young normal subjects (21 females; age, 29 ± 3) and elderly subjects (155 females; age, 73 ± 3.9) with varying bone mineral density. Cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscle groups was measured in MR images to indicate the muscle mass, while the bone mineral content by dual X-ray absorptiometry was used to represent the bone mass. The functional muscle-bone unit was calculated as the ratio between the bone mass to muscle mass.
RESULTS: It showed that with aging, the muscle mass decreased with the bone mass losing. However, more pronounced reduction was found in bone mass than in muscle mass in the subjects with lower bone mineral density.
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-bone interaction was changed in elderly, especially in those with osteoporosis. Unit bone mass corresponded to a higher muscle mass in subjects with reduced bone mineral density than those normal subjects. This may be contributory to the occurrence of nontraumatic vertebral fractures in elderly subjects with reduced bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030288     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2482-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Determinants of the first decade of bone loss after menopause at spine, hip and radius.

Authors:  J Reeve; J Walton; L J Russell; M Lunt; R Wolman; R Abraham; J Justice; A Nicholls; B Wardley-Smith; J R Green; A Mitchell
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1999-05

2.  Structural changes in aging bone: osteopenia in the proximal femurs of female mice.

Authors:  A Weiss; I Arbell; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; M Silbermann
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional Muscle-Bone-Unit".

Authors:  E Schoenau
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Gender-related differences in the relationship between densitometric values of whole-body bone mineral content and lean body mass in humans between 2 and 87 years of age.

Authors:  J L Ferretti; R F Capozza; G R Cointry; S L García; H Plotkin; M L Alvarez Filgueira; J R Zanchetta
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation.

Authors:  C H Turner; M R Forwood; J Y Rho; T Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; K Brown; C Cann; K Zhu; S Henzell; V Low; S Gustafsson; R I Price; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Mechanical loading influences bone mass through estrogen receptor alpha.

Authors:  Karla C L Lee; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.230

9.  The bone-muscle relationship in men and women.

Authors:  Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2011-10-05

10.  Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umeå, Sweden.

Authors:  U Bergström; U Björnstig; H Stenlund; H Jonsson; O Svensson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Increased body fat mass and tissue lipotoxicity associated with ovariectomy or high-fat diet differentially affects bone and skeletal muscle metabolism in rats.

Authors:  Camille Tagliaferri; Jérôme Salles; Jean-François Landrier; Christophe Giraudet; Véronique Patrac; Patrice Lebecque; Marie-Jeanne Davicco; Audrey Chanet; Corinne Pouyet; Amélie Dhaussy; Alain Huertas; Yves Boirie; Yohann Wittrant; Véronique Coxam; Stéphane Walrand
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 2.  Muscle-bone and fat-bone interactions in regulating bone mass: do PTH and PTHrP play any role?

Authors:  Nabanita S Datta
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Discrimination of vertebral fragility fracture with lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Mao; Yong Zhang; Kai Li; Ling Wang; Yi-Min Ma; Wei-Lin Xiao; Wen-Liang Chen; Jia-Feng Zhang; Qiang Yuan; Nicole Le; Xiao-Lin Shi; Ai-Hong Yu; Zhenming Hu; Jie Hao; Xiao-Guang Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Femoral Bone Marrow Insulin Sensitivity Is Increased by Resistance Training in Elderly Female Offspring of Overweight and Obese Mothers.

Authors:  Ville Huovinen; Marco Bucci; Heta Lipponen; Riku Kiviranta; Samuel Sandboge; Juho Raiko; Suvi Koskinen; Kalle Koskensalo; Johan G Eriksson; Riitta Parkkola; Patricia Iozzo; Pirjo Nuutila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Integrating genome-wide association and transcriptome prediction model identifies novel target genes for osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Zhu; P Yin; F Hu; J Jiang; L Yin; Y Li; S Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.