Literature DB >> 24029389

A meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG and (11)C-methionine PET for differentiating brain tumors.

C Zhao1, Y Zhang2, J Wang1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: (18)F-FDG-PET has been widely used in patients with brain tumors. However, the reported sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG-PET for brain tumor differentiation varied greatly. We performed this meta-analysis to systematically assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG-PET in differentiating brain tumors. The diagnostic performance of (11)C-methionine PET was assessed for comparison. Relevant studies were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (until February 2013). The methodologic quality of eligible studies was evaluated, and a meta-analysis was performed to obtain the combined diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG and (11)C-methionine PET with a bivariate model. Thirty eligible studies, including 5 studies with both (18)F-FDG and (11)C-methionine PET data were enrolled. Pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of (18)F-FDG-PET (n = 24) for differentiating brain tumors were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63-0.78), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.85), and 0.80. Heterogeneity was found among (18)F-FDG studies. Subsequent subgroup analysis revealed that the disease status was a statistically significant source of the heterogeneity and that the sensitivity in the patients with recurrent brain tumor was markedly higher than those with suspected primary brain tumors. Pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic of (11)C-methionine PET (n = 11) were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92), and 0.94. No significant statistical heterogeneity was found among (11)C-methionine studies. This meta-analysis suggested that (18)F-FDG-PET has limited diagnostic performance in brain tumor differentiation, though its performance may vary according to the status of brain tumor, whereas (11)C-methionine PET has excellent diagnostic accuracy in brain tumor differentiation.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24029389     DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

Review 1.  Discrimination between primary low-grade and high-grade glioma with 11C-methionine PET: a bivariate diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Falk Delgado; Alberto Falk Delgado
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  From Carbon-11-Labeled Amino Acids to Peptides in Positron Emission Tomography: the Synthesis and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Aleksandra Pekošak; Ulrike Filp; Alex J Poot; Albert D Windhorst
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients presenting with inconclusive [18F]FDG PET/CT findings.

Authors:  Haojun Chen; Liang Zhao; Dan Ruan; Yizhen Pang; Bing Hao; Yaqing Dai; Xiurong Wu; Wei Guo; Chunlei Fan; Jingxun Wu; Weipeng Huang; Qin Lin; Long Sun; Hua Wu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Dunet; Anastasia Pomoni; Andreas Hottinger; Marie Nicod-Lalonde; John O Prior
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  PET/CT in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Cristina De Angelis; Saadi Sollaku; Emanuele Casciani; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  One-step synthesis of an 18F-labeled boron-derived methionine analog: a substitute for 11C-methionine?

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Emily B Ehlerding; Weibo Cai; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of PET/CT with tracers other than F-18-FDG in oncology: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  G Treglia; R Sadeghi; A Del Sole; L Giovanella
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Hypoxia and glucose metabolism assessed by FMISO and FDG PET for predicting IDH1 mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status in newly diagnosed malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Kenta Suzuki; Nobuyuki Kawai; Tomoya Ogawa; Keisuke Miyake; Aya Shinomiya; Yuka Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Takashi Tamiya
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Imaging Spectrum and Pitfalls of (11)C-Methionine Positron Emission Tomography in a Series of Patients with Intracranial Lesions.

Authors:  Kimiteru Ito; Hiroshi Matsuda; Kazoo Kubota
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.