Literature DB >> 24028470

A multivariate view of the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

M J Wyman1, J R Stinchcombe, L Rowe.   

Abstract

Sexual differences are often dramatic and widespread across taxa. Their extravagance and ubiquity can be puzzling because the common underlying genome of males and females is expected to impede rather than foster phenotypic divergence. Widespread dimorphism, despite a shared genome, may be more readily explained by considering the multivariate, rather than univariate, framework governing the evolution of sexual dimorphism. In the univariate formulation, differences in genetic variances and a low intersexual genetic correlation (rMF) can facilitate the evolution of sexual dimorphism. However, studies that have analysed sex-specific differences in heritabilities or genetic variances do not always find significant differences. Furthermore, many of the reported estimates of rMF are very high and positive. When monomorphic heritabilities and a high rMF are present together, the evolution of sexual dimorphism on a trait-by-trait basis is severely constrained. By contrast, the multivariate formulation has greater generality and more flexibility. Although the number of multivariate sexual dimorphism studies is low, almost all support sex-specific differences in the G (variance-covariance) matrix; G matrices can differ with respect to size and/or orientation, affecting the response to selection differently between the sexes. Second, whereas positive values of the univariate quantity rMF only hinder positive changes in sexual dimorphism, positive covariances in the intersexual covariance B matrix can either help or hinder. Similarly, the handful of studies reporting B matrices indicate that it is often asymmetric, so that B can affect the evolution of single traits differently between the sexes. Multivariate approaches typically demonstrate that genetic covariances among traits can strongly constrain trait evolution when compared with univariate approaches. By contrast, in the evolution of sexual dimorphism, a multivariate view potentially reveals more opportunities for sexual dimorphism to evolve by considering the effect sex-specific selection has on sex-specific G matrices and an asymmetric B matrix.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2013 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Keywords:  B matrix; intersexual genetic correlation; sexual antagonism; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24028470     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  17 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Inheritance of hormonal stress response and temperament in infant rhesus macaques (Macaca Mulatta): Nonadditive and sex-specific effects.

Authors:  Gregory E Blomquist; Katie Hinde; John P Capitanio
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.154

5.  The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the moss Ceratodon purpureus.

Authors:  Leslie M Kollar; Scott Kiel; Ashley J James; Cody T Carnley; Danielle N Scola; Taylor N Clark; Tikahari Khanal; Todd N Rosenstiel; Elliott T Gall; Karl Grieshop; Stuart F McDaniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The evolution of sex differences in disease.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.027

7.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex-specific plasticity and genotype × sex interactions for age and size of maturity in the sheepshead swordtail, Xiphophorus birchmanni.

Authors:  K Boulton; G G Rosenthal; A J Grimmer; C A Walling; A J Wilson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  You are what you eat: diet shapes body composition, personality and behavioural stability.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 10.  Evolution of sex-specific pace-of-life syndromes: genetic architecture and physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Elina Immonen; Anni Hämäläinen; Wiebke Schuett; Maja Tarka
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.