Literature DB >> 24027346

Taxonomy and epidemiology of Mucor irregularis, agent of chronic cutaneous mucormycosis.

X-L Lu1, M J Najafzadeh, S Dolatabadi, Y-P Ran, A H G Gerrits van den Ende, Y-N Shen, C-Y Li, L-Y Xi, F Hao, Q-Q Zhang, R-Y Li, Z-M Hu, G-X Lu, J-J Wang, M Drogari-Apiranthitou, C Klaassen, J F Meis, F Hagen, W-D Liu, G S de Hoog.   

Abstract

Mucormycosis usually presents as a progressive infection with significant angio-invasion. Mucormycosis due to Mucor irregularis (formerly Rhizomucor variabilis var. variabilis), however, is exceptional in causing chronic cutaneous infection in immunocompetent humans, ultimately leading to severe morbidity if left untreated. More than 90 % of the cases known to date were reported from Asia, mainly from China. The nearest neighbour of M. irregularis is the saprobic species M. hiemalis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the taxonomic position, epidemiology, and intra- and inter-species diversity of M. irregularis based on 21 strains (clinical n = 17) by multilocus analysis using ITS, LSU, RPB1 and RPB2 genes, compared to results of cluster analysis with amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data. By combining MLST and AFLP analyses, M. irregularis was found to be monophyletic with high bootstrap support, and consisted of five subgroups, which were not concordant in all partitions. It was thus confirmed that M. irregularis is a single species at 96.1-100 % ITS similarity and low recombination rates between populations. Some geographic structuring was noted with some localised populations, which may be explained by limited air-dispersal. The natural habitat of the species is likely to be in soil and decomposing plant material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mucor hiemalis; Mucor irregularis; Mucormycosis; biodiversity; chronic cutaneous infection; epidemiology; taxonomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027346      PMCID: PMC3734966          DOI: 10.3767/003158513X665539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Persoonia        ISSN: 0031-5850            Impact factor:   11.051


INTRODUCTION

Members of Mucoromycotina are notorious for their acute, disfiguring, often fatal infections in severely compromised human hosts. The infection usually takes a progressive, invasive course with marked angiotropism and occlusion of blood vessels leading to rapid necrosis of tissue. The mortality rate of affected patients often exceeds 50 % (Roden et al. 2005, Skiada 2011). The most frequently occurring opportunists include Rhizopus arrhizus (R. oryzae), R. microsporus and Lichtheimia corymbifera (formerly Absidia corymbifera) (Ribes et al. 2000, Alvarez et al. 2009, Dolatabadi et al. In press). All these species have a long history in industrial mycology. Many species had already been described in the 19th century (Walther et al. 2013) and several are among the classic agents of opportunistic infections in humans (de Hoog et al. 2009). Mucorales are among the prevalent pioneer invaders of virgin substrates, such as foodstuffs, which they degrade by the production of lipolytic and a wide array of other enzymes (Hiol et al. 2000, Ghorbel et al. 2005). In many countries in Asia and Africa this property is used for fermentation of foodstuffs based on soy and other lipid-rich agricultural products. Mucorales are also primary causes of food spoilage of soy cakes used in traditional foods in Asia (Yao et al. 2010, Kim et al. 2011). A recently described emerging opportunistic fungus especially being reported from Asia, Mucor irregularis (formerly Rhizomucor variabilis var. variabilis) is unique in many respects. Its clinical infection pattern deviates considerably from that of other Mucorales by being chronic and by occurring in immunocompetent patients without apparent underlying disorder (Lu et al. 2009, Hemashettar et al. 2011). Mucor irregularis infection usually persists with a history of several years on exposed sites such as the face and the extremities. The infection is cutaneous and subcutaneous without angio-invasion especially at the early stage (Lu et al. 2009, Zhao et al. 2009), and finally leads to severe mutilation (Lu et al. 2009, Li & Lun 2012). Its environmental habitat has as yet not been revealed with certainty. Mucor irregularis was first isolated from lesions of a Chinese patient with a primary cutaneous infection in 1991 and was named Rhizomucor variabilis var. variabilis (Zheng & Chen 1991). From that moment onwards, more cases were reported in China during the past 20 yr (Lu et al. 2009, Zhao et al. 2009, Li & Lun 2012). In 2010, a case of secondary and complex infection including R. variabilis was reported from Australia (Ribeiro et al. 2010). Subsequently, three cases of primary infection outside of China were reported, from Japan (Tomita et al. 2011), India (Hemashettar et al. 2011), and the USA (Schell et al. 2011), respectively. Interestingly, all except one case of primary infection in humans were reported from Asia, particularly China, and the disease despite its disfiguring appearance had not been reported before 1990. Today, 17 cases have been reported, suggesting that this is one of the few truly emerging opportunistic fungi. Rhizomucor variabilis was renamed as M. irregularis because results of rDNA ITS sequencing showed closer phylogenetic distance to Mucor species, especially M. hiemalis (Voigt et al. 1999, Alvarez et al. 2011). The present paper focuses on the unique mucoralean species M. irregularis, its geographic distribution and possible routes of transmission, as well as its taxonomy. In a large phylogenetic overview of Mucorales including more than 75 % of all species known to date, Walther et al. (2013) confirmed that the nearest neighbour of M. irregularis is indeed M. hiemalis. This saprobic species was first isolated by Behrens in 1902 (Schipper 1973) and has only rarely been reported as an agent of human disease (de Hoog et al. 2009). It was mentioned by Neame & Rayner (1960) as one of the agents of mucormycosis, but no material is presently available to verify this claim. The cases of Costa et al. (1990) and Prevoo et al. (1991) may have been misidentifications (see below). Thus, the origin of the exceptional pathology of M. irregularis within the Mucoromycotina seems to have emerged de novo. A detailed study of the biology of M. irregularis therefore seems overdue. In this study, we explored the intra- and inter-species diversity of M. irregularis using phylogenetic analysis based on gene sequencing of four loci, compared with cluster analysis based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Strains

Sixteen clinical isolates of M. irregularis, derived from Chinese cutaneous mucormycosis patients, including the ex-type strain and maintained at the reference collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS), Utrecht, The Netherlands (Table 1) were studied. Another five strains from clinical samples (n = 1) and from the environment (n = 4) were also included. The latter strains had been deposited as other Mucor species in the CBS collection and identification as M. irregularis was verified by rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS) sequencing followed by BLAST analysis in GenBank and phylogenetic tree construction. The ex-type stain of M. luteus (CBS 243.35) and the ex-neotype strain of M. hiemalis (CBS 201.65) were included as outgroups. All strains used in this study are deposited either in the CBS culture collection or at the Centre of Medical Fungi, China Committee for Culture Collection of Microorganisms (CMFCCC), Nanjing, China. Stock cultures were maintained on slants of malt extract agar (MEA 5 %, Oxoid, Badhoevedorp, The Netherlands) and potato dextrose agar (PDA), dextrose (Merck), agar (Oxoid) at 24 °C.
Table 1

Data and GenBank numbers of Mucor irregularis strains used in this study.

Strain1Original identificationSource (location, duration)GeographyGenBank accession No.2
Reference
LSUITSRPB1RPB2
CBS 103.93 (T)Rhizomucor variabilis (T)Human, skin (wrist, 18-year)China, JiangsuJX976212JX976257JX976234JX976279Zheng & Chen 1991
CBS 100164Mucor hiemalis f. luteusHuman, skin (face, 2-year)China, JiangxiJX976213JX976258JX976235JX976280Wang et al. 1998
CBS 609.78Mucor hiemalis f. hiemalisGarden soilNigeriaJX976215JX976260JX976237JX976282
CBS 654.78Mucor aff. variisporusOwl pelletIndiaJX976216JX976261JX976238JX976283
CBS 700.71Mucor hiemalis f. luteusSoilIndiaJX976199JX976247JX976225JX976270
CBS 977.68Mucor hiemalis f. hiemalisUnknownIndiaJX976214JX976259JX976236JX976281
CMFCCC B 50eRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 3-year)China, ShanghaiJX976217JX976262JX976239JX976284Zhao et al. 2009
CMFCCC B 50fRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skinChina, ShandongJX976201JX976245JX976224JX976269
CMFCCC B 50gRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 3-year)China, HubeiJX976218JX976263JX976240JX976285Hu et al. 2010
CMFCCC B 50hRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 2-year)China, AnhuiJX976203JX976248JX976226JX976271Zhang et al. 2010
CMFCCC B 50iRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 10-year)China, JiangsuJX976200JX976244JX976223JX976268Lu et al. 2009
CMFCCC B 50jRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (neck, right upper extremity, 16-year)China, JiangsuJX976220JX976265JX976242JX976287Qi et al. 2012
CMFCCC B 50kRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skinChina, JiangsuJX976205JX976250JX976228JX976273
CMFCCC B 50lRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skinChina, HubeiJX976219JX976264JX976241JX976286
CMFCCC B 50mRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 2-year)China, JiangxiJX976207JX976252JX976230JX976275Qin et al. 2010
CMFCCC B 50nMucor sp.Human, skin (face, 1-year)China, SichuanJX976208JX976253JX976231JX976276Jiang et al. 2003
CMFCCC B 50oMucor sp.Human, skin (face, 2-year)China, SichuanJX976221JX976266JX976243JX976288Ran et al. 2006
CMFCCC B 50pRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, 7-month)China, ChongqingJX976206JX976251JX976229JX976274Zhou et al. 2011
CMFCCC B 50qRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (face, neck, 22-year)China, JiangxiJX976204JX976249JX976227JX976272
CMFCCC B 50rRhizomucor variabilisHuman, skin (right upper extremity, 7-year)China, ShandongJX976210JX976255JX976232JX976277Li et al. 2004
CMFCCC B 50sRhizomucor variabilis var. regulariorHuman, skin (face, 9-year)China, ShandongJX976211JX976256JX976233JX976278Li et al. 2006

1 CBS = Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMFCCC = Center of Medical Fungi, China Committee for Culture Collection of Microorganism, Nanjing, China; T = Type strain.

2 ITS = Internal Transcribed Spacer region; LSU = partial 28S rDNA; RPB1 = partial RNA polymerase II large subunit; RPB2 = partial RNA polymerase II second largest subunit.

Morphology

Strains were cultured on 5 % MEA (Oxoid) at 30 °C for 5 d. The abundantly sporulating strain CBS 103.93 was taken as model for descriptions and illustrations. Observations were done using both a light microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE 80i, Japan) and a stereo microscope (Nikon SMZ1500, Japan). Microscopic slide preparation was done using water as mounting fluid. Photos were made using a Nikon digital sight DS-5M114780 camera (Nikon, Japan). Magnification was 400–1000× for light microscopy and 100× for stereo microscopy.

Extraction of genomic DNA

Approximately 1 cm2 of 4-d-old cultures on MEA at 24 °C were transferred to a tube containing glass beads (Sigma G9143) and 400 μL TEx buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands), pH 9.0 (100 mM Tris [hydroxymethyl]-aminomethane, 40 mM Na-EDTA). The samples were homogenized for 3 min using a Genie®2 Vortex (MoBio, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Subsequently 120 μL of a 10 % sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution and 5 U of Proteinase K (10 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) were added followed by 30 min of incubation in a waterbath at 55 °C. In total 120 μL of 5 M sodium chloride and 1/10 volume of 10 % CTAB (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide) were added to the material followed by 60 min incubation at 55 °C. The samples were vortexed again for 3 min. One volume of chloroform : iso-amylalcohol 24 : 1 (v/v) was added and the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 4 °C at 14 000 rpm (20 400 rcf). The supernatant was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube with 225 μL 5 M NH4-acetate (Sigma-Aldrich), mixed carefully by inverting, incubated for 30 min on ice water, and centrifuged again for 5 min at 4 °C at 14 000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to another Eppendorf tube with 0.55× volumes of isopropanol. After incubation at −20 °C for at least 30 min DNA was pelleted at 14 000 rpm (20 400 rcf) for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was decanted and the DNA pellet was washed with 1 000 μL ice cold 70 % ethanol. After drying at room temperature, it was re-suspended in 50 μL of TE buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) (Tris 0.12 % w/v, Na-EDTA 0.04 % w/v, pH 8.0). Quality of genomic DNA was verified on agarose gel. Genomic DNA was stored at −20 °C.

DNA amplification and sequencing

Four gene regions were amplified for multilocus sequence typing, i.e. the D1/D2 region of the nuclear large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (nucLSU), rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS), partial largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II (RPB1), and partial second largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II (RPB2) genes. Primers used for amplification and sequencing are listed in Table 2. PCR reactions were performed in 25 μL volumes reaction mixture with 7 μL Go Taq master mix (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) containing reaction buffer, MgCl2, dNTPs, 1 μL of each primer (10 pmol), and 1 μL template DNA. Amplification was performed on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cycling conditions included 5 min at 94 °C for initial denaturation, followed by 35 cycles consisting of 94 °C for 45 s, 53 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 2 min, and final elongation for 7 min at 72 °C. The annealing temperature was changed to 51 °C for RPB1 and RPB2. Amplicons were purified using GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Sequencing was performed as follows: 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles consisting of 95 °C for 10 s, 50 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 2 min. Reactions were purified with Sephadex G-50 fine (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) and sequencing was done on an ABI 3730XL automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems) with ABI PRISM BigDyeTM terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).
Table 2

List of primers used for amplification and sequencing.

LocusName of primerPrimer sequence (5’-3’)Reference
LSULR0RACC CGC TGA ACT TAA GCVilgalys & Hester 1990
LR5ATC CTG AGG GAA ACT TCVilgalys & Hester 1990
ITSITS1TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG GWhite et al. 1990
ITS4TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GCWhite et al. 1990
RPB1RPB1-AfGAR TGY CCD GGD CAY TTY GGStiller & Hall 1997
RPB1-CrCCN GCD ATN TCR TTR TCC ATR TAStiller & Hall 1997
RPB2fRPB2-5FGAY GAY MGW GAT CAY TTY GGLiu et al. 1999
fRPB2-7cRCCC ATR GCT TGY TTR CCC ATLiu et al. 1999

Alignment and phylogenetic reconstruction

Consensus sequences were assembled using the SeqMan package of Lasergene software (DNAStar, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Phylogenetic analyses were focused on multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) which included four markers: partial LSU, ITS, partial RPB1 and partial RPB2, which were analysed separately and combined. Sequences were aligned automatically with manual adjustment using BioNumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Phylogenetic relationships were estimated for all alignments by maximum parsimony analysis done in MEGA v. 5.05 (Tamura et al. 2011) and by use of a Bayesian approach with Monte Carlo Markov chains performed with the MrBayes (v. 3.1) computer program (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). Bayesian analyses were performed by running 1 000 000 generations in four chains, saving the current tree every 100 generations. The last 18 000 trees were used to construct a 50 % majority-rule consensus tree. Phylogenetic reconstructions and bootstrap values were obtained for each locus separately by Neighbour-Joining method and Maximum likelihood method with 500 bootstrap replications using MEGA v. 5.05 (as described above). Bootstrap values ≥ 70 % for the NJ and ML methods, and ≥ 0.95 for Bayesian inference were considered significant (Hillis & Bull 1993). The congruence between loci was assessed using on-line calculation of the congruency index I (de Vienne et al. 2007). After performing the partition-homogeneity test (PHT) to verify congruency among the four genes, the loci were combined and aligned using BioNumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths). The multilocus phylogenetic tree was constructed by Neighbour-Joining and Maximum likelihood with 500 bootstrap replications using MEGA v. 5.05 (as described above). Moreover, the ITS dataset was used in order to investigate the phylogenetic placement of M. irregularis and relationship between M. irregularis and M. hiemalis. This dataset included ITS sequence data from the present study supplemented with sequences from GenBank (JQ885450, JQ776538, GU355647, JN827387, JN107738, HQ891659, HM639969, HM639970, HM639968, EU196747 and FJ875119). The ITS sequences were compared in a large database maintained at CBS for research purposes and the sequence data of BMU 02530, BMU 2257, dH 18763, dH 19950, KN 97-9 and KN 97-1 were included as well. Mucor luteus, M. hiemalis and M. silvaticus were used as outgroup. Sequences were aligned automatically with manual adjustment using BioNumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by Neighbour-Joining and Maximum Likelihood methods with 500 bootstrap replications using MEGA v. 5.05 (as described above).

AFLP analysis

Approximately 50 ng of genomic DNA was subjected to a com-bined restriction ligation procedure containing 50 pmol of HpyCH4 IV adapter, 50 pmol MseI adapter, 2 U of HpyCH4 IV (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA), 2 U of MseI (New England Biolabs), and 1 U of T4 DNA ligase (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) in a total volume of 20 μL of 1× reaction buffer for 1 h at 20 °C. Subsequently, the mixture was diluted five times with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) buffer. Adapters were made by mixing equimolar amounts of complementary oligonucleotides (5’-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3’ and 5’-CGGGTACGCAGTC-3’ for HpyCH4 IV; 5’-GACGATGAGTCCTGAC-3’ and 5’-TAGTCAGGACTCAT-3’ for MseI) and heating to 95 °C, subsequently cooling slowly to ambient temperature. One microliter of the diluted restriction-ligation mixture was used for amplification in a volume of 25 μL under the following conditions: 1 μM HpyCH4 IV primer with one selective residue (5’-Flu-GTAGACT GCGTACCCGTT-3’), 1 μM MseI primer with four selective residues (5’-GATGAGTCCTGACTAATGAG-3’), 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands) in 1× reaction buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl2. Amplification was done as follows. After an initial denaturation step for 4 min at 94 °C in the first 20 cycles, a touchdown procedure was applied: 15 s of denaturation at 94 °C, 15 s of annealing at 66 °C, with the temperature for each successive cycle lowered by 0.5 °C, and 1 min of extension at 72 °C. Cycling was then continued for a further 30 cycles with an annealing temperature of 56 °C. After completion of the cycles, incubation at 72 °C for 10 min was performed before the reaction mixtures were cooled to room temperature. The amplicons were then combined with the ET400-R size standard (GE Healthcare, Diegem, Belgium) and analysed on a Mega BACE 500 automated DNA platform (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were inspected visually and were also imported in BioNumerics v. 6.0 software (Applied Maths) and analysed by UPGMA clustering using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The analysis was restricted to DNA fragments in the range from 80−250 bp.

RESULTS

Phylogeny analysis

The four genes could be sequenced directly for all strains except CBS 243.35 for which no editable trace file of RPB2 could be obtained. Newly generated sequences have been deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Fig. 1 presents the rDNA phylogeny based on the ITS region representing four species of Mucor. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Neighbour-Joining, Maximum likelihood (data not shown) and Bayesian approaches. The resulting three phylograms yield almost identical topologies. Four well-supported groups became apparent that consisted of M. irregularis, M. hiemalis, M. luteus and M. silvaticus (all bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are 100/1.0, respectively). Mucor irregularis showed similarities below 90 % with the outgroups (87.2–88.8 % with M. hiemalis, 83.7–84.7 % with M. luteus and 79.4–79.8 % with M. silvaticus, respectively). The intraspecies ITS variability of M. irregularis is 96.1–100 %. Clinical isolates are shown with red crosses in the ITS tree (Fig. 1). Almost all clinical isolates are grouped in M. irregularis except CBS 123972, which originated from a sputum sample in Germany. But there was no predominant subgroup distribution with respect to clinical and environmental isolates in M. irregularis. Among the three M. hiemalis species, only a single isolate (CBS 567.70) originated from Asia, while, conversely, only a single isolate (CBS 609.78) of M. irregularis originated from outside Asia.
Fig. 1.

Phylogeny of Mucor irregularis obtained from a Neighbour-Joining analysis of Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) using Mega 5 software. Bootstrap support values were estimated based on 500 replicates, and are shown by the numbers near the branches (Neighbour-Joining bootstrap values / Bayesian posterior probabilities, boldface branch for values ≥ 80). Strains forming well-supported subgroups are marked in colour. Three Mucor species were taken as outgroup. Species names are given only for ex-type strains. Geographic origins of isolates are given with strain numbers. T = ex-type strain; NT = ex-neotype strain; = strains from clinical samples; = isolates from soil; = isolates from plants; = isolates from animals or animal excretion.

For multilocus sequence analysis, the LSU sequence alignment (a total of 930 characteristics, of which 2 were parsimony-informative intraspecies) resulted in 350 most parsimonious trees (TL = 59 steps), the RPB1 sequence alignment (a total of 805 characteristics, of which 24 were parsimony informative intraspecies) resulted in 76 most parsimonious trees (TL = 165 steps), and the RPB2 sequence alignment (a total of 949 characteristics, of which 13 were parsimony informative intraspecies) resulted in 107 most parsimonious trees (TL = 126 steps). A separate clade corresponding to M. irregularis showed high bootstrap-support in all the trees. Similarities between M. hiemalis and M. irregularis of ITS, LSU, RPB1 and RPB2 were 87.2–88.8 %, 96.9–97.0 %, 73.2–74.0 %, and 87.8–88.1 %, respectively. In the ITS tree, five subgroups (subgroups 1–5) appear among the M. irregularis group except CBS 977.68 (bootstraps for NJ/Bayesian posterior probabilities = 84/0.79, 81/1.0, 95/0.83, 80/1.0 and 97/1.0, respectively). The strains in subgroup 2 and 4 were isolated from different countries including China, Nigeria and India, while the isolates of remaining subgroups were isolated from China. The strain designations are attributed the same colour if the strains belong to same subgroup in the ITS genealogy (Fig. 1). Because the same colour coding is used in the LSU, RPB1 and RPB2 trees, conflicts in gene genealogies of different loci are visualized by the intermixing of colours (Fig. 2a–c). Partition homogeneity test showed congruence of all four genes (LSU, ITS, RPB1 and RPB2), which were therefore combined. The combined sequence alignment (a total of 2 861 characteristics, of which 64 were parsimony-informative intraspecies) resulted in 105 most parsimonious trees (TL = 272 steps). The tree topologies obtained by Neighbour-Joining, Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo analyses were largely similar. Therefore, the Maximum-likelihood and the Bayesian trees are not shown (Fig. 2d). In the combined tree, M. irregularis clade showed 100 % bootstrap support, and three well-supported subgroups (bootstrap of subgroup 1, 3, 4 = 100 %, 94 % and 99 %, respectively) were consistent with the ITS tree. Subgroup 2 in ITS tree was divided into two well-supported clade (bootstraps 90 and 99 %, respectively), while subgroup 5 was merged into subgroup 4.
Fig. 2.

Neighbour-Joining phylograms of 21 isolates of Mucor irregularis based on four different markers: a. LSU; b. RPB1; c. RPB2; d. multilocus, combining sequences of LSU, ITS, RPB1 and RPB2 by Mega 5 software. Branches with bootstrap values, estimated based on 500 replicates in the Neighbour-Joining analysis, are printed in bold when 70 or higher. Branch support values are indicated by the numbers near the branches (Neighbour-Joining bootstrap values / Bayesian posterior probabilities). Group colours used in four phylograms per strain are the same as in the ITS phylogram. CBS 243.35 and CBS 201.65 were taken as outgroup. T = ex-type strain; NT = ex-neotype strain.

AFLP

Profiles of 20 strains of Mucor irregularis were generated including CBS 243.35 and CBS 201.65 as outgroup controls. Fingerprints contained bands in a 50–500 bp range. Dendrograms derived from the AFLP banding patterns of M. irregularis were generated by using UPGMA cluster analysis (Fig. 3). At > 73 % similarity, five main clusters were found. Clusters 1, 2, 4 and 5 approximately matched with coloured AFLP subgroups, but particularly subgroup 4 (red AFLP) contained strains with widely different AFLP profiles. Deviating strain CBS 700.71 was also shown to be different in remaining partitions (Fig. 2), but CMFCCC B 50k, 50r and 50s were together in all genes while the AFLP pattern was deviant. Strains originating from garden soil in Nigeria in 1966, from an owl pellet in India in 1978, and recent strains from Chinese patients with mucormycosis were all found in a single ITS subgroup (2) and clustered together with AFLP.
Fig. 3.

Dendrogram of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) profiles of 21 Mucor irregularis isolates. Mucor hiemalis (CBS 201.65) and Mucor luteus (CBS 243.35) are taken as outgroup. The scale bar on the top indicates the percentage similarity. Strain colours: blue = ITS subgroup 1; green = ITS subgroup 2; yellow = ITS subgroup 3; red = ITS subgroup 4; ochre = ITS subgroup 5.

Morphological characteristics

Colonies grew rapidly at 30 °C on MEA, were expanding, hairy and whitish, and pale-yellow in reverse (Fig. 4a, b). Sporangio-phores were hyaline, up to 2 mm high, 10–20 μm wide, sympodially and monopodially branched arising from abundant branched hyphae, branches all ending in a sporangium. Sporangia (sub)spherical, up to 100 μm diam; membrane diffluent; columella spherical, ellipsoidal to cylindrical, about 40 μm wide, with apophysis. Sporangiospores were hyaline, smooth-walled, very variable, mostly subspherical to ellipsoidal, 3–11 × 2–7 μm. Chlamydospores abundant and occur in hyphae and sporangiophores.
Fig. 4.

Macroscopic and microscopic morphology of Mucor irregularis. a. Colony on MEA after 4 days incubation at 30 °C; b. colony from backside; c, d, f–k. columella and sporangiospores; e. sporangia. — Scale bar = 10 μm.

DISCUSSION

Recent molecular studies have shown that, being re-classified in the genus Mucor, M. irregularis had M. hiemalis as its closest neighbour (Alvarez et al. 2009, Walther et al. 2013). The M. hie-malis group comprises a number of species that are phylogenetically widely different, which were included as outgroup in our study. Mucor luteus, M. hiemalis and M. silvaticus proved to be significantly distinct from one another. When these three species were taken as outgroup in an ITS phylogeny, M. irregularis composed a monophyletic clade with high bootstrap support, remote from M. hiemalis at similarities below 90 %. With the remaining genes studied comparably high relative distances to M. hiemalis were found in all four markers, similarities of ITS, LSU, RPB1 and RPB2 being 87.2–88.8 %, 96.9–97.0 %, 73.2–74.0 % and 87.8–88.1 %, respectively. All clinical isolates studied in the present revision clustered in M. irregularis, with the exception of CBS 123972, which proved to belong to the saprobic taxon M. hiemalis (Fig. 1). This strain originated from sputum of a human patient in Germany; the remaining strains of the same cluster, as far as is known, were cultured from soil or from faeces. Clinical data of CBS 123972 were too scant to establish whether or not the isolate was involved in a disease process or was just a colonizer. In contrast, strain CBS 100164, originally deposited in the CBS collection as a clinical isolate of M. luteus from the skin lesion of a Chinese patient with chronic mucormycosis, was re-identified in our study as M. irregularis. In the literature, four clinical cases have been ascribed to M. hiemalis. Three of these were cutaneous mucormycosis (Costa et al. 1990, Prevoo et al. 1991, de Oliveira-Neto et al. 2006), while the remaining one was a rhinocerebral mucormycosis (Larkin et al. 1986). All four cases were diagnosed based on morphology prior to the description of M. irregularis (Rhizomucor variabilis), and the samples have not been preserved so that DNA confirmation is not possible. Carefully judging the case reports, we have the impression that M. irregularis was concerned rather than M. hiemalis, at least in a number of cases. The case reported by Prevoo et al. (1991) from The Netherlands presented a slowly extending, indurated, erythematous, and scaling eruption on the right cheek in a healthy young girl after an insect bite. The case described by de Oliveira-Neto et al. (2006) from Brazil presented a similar, 5-year history of a slowly enlarging, erythematous plaque with slight elevated, scaling, circinate borders on the right thigh in a healthy immunocompetent young girl. Comparing these cases with the general clinical course of M. irregularis infections, the features of these two cases are clearly consistent with M. irregularis infection (Lu et al. 2009), which is unique among the Mucorales by being chronic cutaneous in healthy individuals. According to Schipper (1973), who provided physiological data of M. hiemalis and M. luteus, this species was unable to grow at temperatures higher than 33 °C, which practically excluded human pathogenicity. With a maximum at 37 °C, M. irregularis is less thermotolerant than most other clinically relevant members of Mucorales, which often grow at temperatures well above 42 °C (Dolatabadi et al. In press). Given the resemblance of ‘M. hiemalisclinical features to those of M. irregularis, the morphological similarities between the two species, and weak temperature tolerance of M. hiemalis, we conclude that these cases ascribed to M. hiemalis were actually caused by M. irregularis. If we include these two cases in the list of cases caused by M. irregularis, the pathogen has a world-wide distribution, mainly occurring in Asia with a focus in China, but also occurring in Australia, the USA, South America and Europe. Mucor hiemalis is an environmental species without any pathogenic potential. Mucormycosis due to M. irregularis presents with unique clinical features. All cases of primary infection reported in the literature demonstrated a chronic process with a history of at least three months (Table 1; Hemashettar et al. 2011, Tomita et al. 2011). Nearly all patients were immunocompetent, non-diabetic and in good general health. None of the cases showed signs of angio-invasiveness especially in the early-stage, and none of the clinical signs typical of classical mucormycosis was observed. Mucormycosis caused by all other members of the order, such as Lichtheimia corymbifera or Rhizopus microsporus, nearly exclusively present with an acute, invasive, rapid process with obvious angio-invasion and leading to massive necrosis within days; the disease is only seen in patients with severe underlying disease such as uncontrolled diabetes, leukemia, or with other types of immuno-incompetence, or in wound infections. In its pathogenicity, M. irregularis differs significantly from all remaining Mucorales. One of the possible factors may be the difference in temperature tolerance between species. The widely known opportunists in the Mucorales are highly thermotolerant or thermophilic, with maximum growth temperatures up to 37–45 °C, such as Apophysomyces spp. (Alvarez et al. 2010b, Chakrabarti et al. 2010), Lichtheimia spp. (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al. 2010), Cunninghamella spp. (de Hoog et al. 2009), Rhizomucor spp. (de Hoog et al. 2009), Rhizopus spp. except R. stolonifer (de Hoog et al. 2009), Saksenaea spp. (Alvarez et al. 2010a), Syncephalastrum racemosum (de Hoog et al. 2009) and Actinomucor elegans (Tully et al. 2009, Mahmud et al. 2012). In the genus Mucor, the potent human and veterinary opportunists M. circinelloides, M. ellipsoideus, M. indicus, M. ramosissimus and M. velutinosus (Alvarez et al. 2011) grow well at 37 °C, while M. amphibiorum, M. irregularis and M. racemosus grow at 35 °C but not at 37 °C (de Hoog et al. 2009), and hence are questionable opportunists or amphibian pathogens at most. Mucor hiemalis and Rhizopus stolonifer show the weakest temperature tolerance (33 °C; Schipper 1973, 1976) and cases reported as caused by these species are doubtful. Cases of mucormycosis due to R. stolonifer were reported decennia ago (Sandler et al. 1971, Ferry & Abedi 1983, del Palacio et al. 1999), without molecular identification. Under the name M. racemosus only a single case has been reported from China (Wang et al. 2002), which was identified by phenotypic methods as well. This case presented similar features as M. irregularis infections, i.e. showing 7-year-history of a cutaneous plaque at the right upper extremity. Judged according to current data, this strain was likely to have been M. irregularis as well. Among the 21 isolates of M. irregularis studied, five subgroups were found in phylogenetic trees of four loci (Fig. 1, 2). The position of most isolates was consistent in most subgroups, but some strains changed position in different loci, such as CBS 977.68, CBS 700.71, CMFCCC B 50n and CMFCCC B 50o, which was also observed in AFLP data, indicated possible recombination events. In vitro mating tests have classically been performed within the closest relative, M. hiemalis and its varieties (Schipper 1973). A recent study in Rhizopus microsporus showed that 83.33 % of the strains belonged to either one mating type and produced well-developed zygospores upon crossing (Dolatabadi et al. In press). Schell et al. (2011), however, noted limited formation of zygospores in M. irregularis. Two sexually active strains were found with high breeding competence, while most strains could not be mated with either mating type. Similar phenomena are known elsewhere in the fungal Kingdom, e.g. in dermatophytes, where Kawasaki (2011) produced apparent mating between phylogenetically unrelated species by the use of sexually very active strains. In Mucorales, interspecific mating mostly leads to the formation of azygospores (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al. 2010, Schell et al. 2011). When presence or absence of mating products do not reflect actual interbreeding communities, the biological species concept is difficult to apply. Three isolates clustered together in all separate markers and in the AFLP dendrogram as subgroup 2. The group included CBS 609.78 from garden soil in Nigeria in 1966, CBS 654.78 from owl pellets of India in 1978 and CMFCCC B 50m from the lesion of a Chinese patient in 2010. Further strains that clustered with this group in the ITS tree (Fig. 1) originated from China and India, while subgroup 4 contained strains from different origins including China and India as well. Some of the subgroups of M. irregularis, however, showed approximate differences in geographic distribution. Strains of subgroups 1 and 3 clustered together in all partitions and comprised strains originating from central China. These subgroups also were partial supported in AFLP dendrogram. The mild local geographic structuring in M. irregularis seems to be in conflict with the intuitive knowledge that members of Mucorales are easily dispersed by air, but the distance that the airborne spores are able to travel is limited. The localised geographic distribution pattern may partly be explained by some of the morphological characters of M. irregularis: the sporangiospores measure 3–11 × 2–7 μm, and are often irregular in shape. In comparison, conidia of the global airborne fungus Aspergillus fumigatus are spherical and measure 2.5–3.0 μm diam. Many filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus species express water-repellent hydrophobins on the conidial surface, which enhance airborne dispersal (Linder et al. 2005). Sporangiospores of M. irregularis are much less hydrophobic and are likely to have a higher sedimentation rate in the atmosphere and hence populations are likely to have a more limited distribution. Mucor irregularis thus far has not been encountered as an airborne contaminant, environmental isolates having been isolated from soil, plants and animal faeces. In conclusion, the comparison of gene genealogies based on four markers (LSU, ITS, RPB1 and RPB2) and AFLP results showed evidence of recombination, and hence M. irregularis is recognised as a single species despite geographic structuring in some of the subgroups. The species is prevalent in East Asia but has a world-wide distribution. Morphological characters of sporangiospores preventing efficient airborne dispersal may be partially responsible for the observed geographic structuring.
  39 in total

1.  Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit.

Authors:  Y J Liu; S Whelen; B D Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees.

Authors:  Damien M de Vienne; Tatiana Giraud; Olivier C Martin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Verification of a taxonomy of dermatophytes based on mating results and phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Masako Kawasaki
Journal:  Med Mycol J       Date:  2011

6.  Phylogeny and PCR identification of clinically important Zygomycetes based on nuclear ribosomal-DNA sequence data.

Authors:  K Voigt; E Cigelnik; K O'donnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Zygomycetes in human disease.

Authors:  J A Ribes; C L Vanover-Sams; D J Baker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Spectrum of zygomycete species identified in clinically significant specimens in the United States.

Authors:  E Alvarez; D A Sutton; J Cano; A W Fothergill; A Stchigel; M G Rinaldi; J Guarro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Fatal rhinocerebral mucormycosis in newly diagnosed diabetic.

Authors:  J G Larkin; I G Butcher; B M Frier; H Brebner
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.

Authors:  R Vilgalys; M Hester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  20 in total

1.  Successful Treatment by Surgery of a Primary Cutaneous Mucormycosis Caused by Mucor irregularis.

Authors:  Guan-Zhao Liang; Wen-Qi Xu; Xiao-Li Zheng; Huan Mei; Gui-Xia Lv; Yong-Nian Shen; Dong-Mei Li; Wei-da Liu
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Changing Epidemiology of Mucoralean Fungi: Chronic Cutaneous Infection Caused by Mucor irregularis.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Mandeep Kaur; Mala Bhalla; Rajpal Singh Punia; Nidhi Singla; Kalyani Bhola; Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Alberto M Stchigel; Josep Guarro
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Drug combinations against Mucor irregularis in vitro.

Authors:  Shuzhen Zhang; Ruoyu Li; Jin Yu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A Revised Species Concept for Opportunistic Mucor Species Reveals Species-Specific Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles.

Authors:  Lysett Wagner; Sybren de Hoog; Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Kerstin Voigt; Oliver Kurzai; Grit Walther
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Species Identification and Delineation of Pathogenic Mucorales by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jin Shao; Zhe Wan; Ruoyu Li; Jin Yu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis.

Authors:  A Skiada; C Lass-Floerl; N Klimko; A Ibrahim; E Roilides; G Petrikkos
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Susceptibility and diversity in the therapy-refractory genus scedosporium.

Authors:  M Lackner; F Hagen; J F Meis; A H G Gerrits van den Ende; D Vu; V Robert; J Fritz; T A A Moussa; G S de Hoog
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Biology, systematics, and clinical manifestations of Zygomycota infections.

Authors:  A Muszewska; J Pawłowska; P Krzyściak
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Mucor irregularis-associated cutaneous mucormycosis: Case report and review.

Authors:  Blandine Rammaert; Cécile Angebault; Anne Scemla; Sylvie Fraitag; Nathalie Lerolle; Marc Lecuit; Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux; Olivier Lortholary
Journal:  Med Mycol Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-24

10.  Elucidating the Ramularia eucalypti species complex.

Authors:  S I R Videira; J Z Groenewald; A Kolecka; L van Haren; T Boekhout; P W Crous
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 11.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.