Pulmonary function reduction in diabetes with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes damages major organ systems through disrupted glycemic control and increased inflammation. The effects of diabetes on the lung have been of interest for decades, but the modest reduction in pulmonary function and its nonprogressive nature have limited its investigation. A recent systematic review found that diabetes was associated with reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung and increased FEV1/FVC. They reported pooled results including few smokers. This study will examine measures of pulmonary function in participants with extensive smoking exposure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined pulmonary function in participants with a >10-pack-year history of smoking with and without diabetes with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We measured pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and pulmonary-related quality of life in 10,129 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.
RESULTS: Participants with diabetes were observed to have reduced pulmonary function after controlling for known risk factors and also significant reductions in exercise capacity and quality of life across functional stages of COPD.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary function in patients with ≥10 pack-years of smoking and diabetes is reduced, and this decrease is associated with significant reductions in activity-related quality of life and exercise capacity.

Introduction

Reduced pulmonary function has been observed in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (1–4). This functional impairment has been shown primarily through cross-sectional associations between diabetes status and pulmonary function measures, including the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and their ratio. van den Borst et al. (5) recently conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating pulmonary function in diabetes, which supports observations of a modest reduction in FEV1, FVC, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung associated with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This reduced lung function manifests as a reduction in FEV1% predicted of 2.8% in type 1 diabetes and 4.9% in type 2 diabetes and a reduction of FVC% predicted of 3.8% in type 1 diabetes and 6.7% in type 2 diabetes. These reductions have not been examined in patients with extensive smoking exposure or a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6,7). Diabetes has not been shown to be a strong predictor of pulmonary function decline over time (8–10), suggesting that pulmonary complications of diabetes are not progressive, as is the case with other complications of diabetes with microvascular origins such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and peripheral neuropathy. Reversal of diabetes through simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation has been shown to ameliorate FEV1 and FVC reductions in a select population (7).

The origins of pulmonary function impairment in diabetes are thought to derive from four primary sources: nonenzymatic glycosylation of lung collagen and elastin by advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) generated by disrupted glycemic control resulting in reduced elasticity of the lung (1,11). Of potentially equal importance, thickened alveolar epithelial basal lamina and microvascular changes in pulmonary capillary beds resulting in reduced pulmonary capillary blood volume and reduced diffusing capacity have been reported (1,3,12). Autonomic neuropathy affecting the phrenic nerves, resulting in reduced muscle tone and control of the diaphragm, has been observed (13,14). Finally, hyperglycemia resulting in increased glucose in airway surface liquid (ASL) serving as fuel for bacteria and a subsequent increase in the frequency of bacterial pathogens isolated in the sputum. Increased bacterial colonization has been shown to lead to more frequent acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) and worse outcomes from those exacerbations (15–17). Each of these pathways may work synergistically with other pulmonary disorders, such as COPD, potentially resulting in negative outcomes for patients with both disorders.

To the authors’ knowledge, there are no reports of pulmonary function reduction in patients with diabetes and overt COPD. Given the importance of smoking in COPD development, we sought to investigate whether diabetes was associated with pulmonary function reduction in three groups of smokers: the first is a population at risk for COPD (>45 years of age and >10 pack-years of smoking history with postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FEV1 >80%, control subjects), the second is a group with frank COPD (FEV1/FVC <0.70 and FEV1 <80%) staged by the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (COPD subjects), and a third group with lung function impairment characterized by reduced FEV1 and preserved FEV1/FVC ratio (unclassified spirometric abnormality subjects) (Fig. 1). We investigated whether diabetes, type 1 or 2, was associated with reduced pulmonary function in each of these groups, separating the frank COPD group by spirometric GOLD classification for severity. We also investigated whether these groups differed in functional capacity and quality of life.

Figure 1

The prevalence of diabetes (type 1 or type 2) by GOLD classification.

Research Design and Methods

The Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study is a large, observational study designed to identify genetic risk factors for COPD in a biracial population of non-Hispanic white (NHW) (approximately two-thirds) and African American (approximately one-third) smokers with at least a 10–pack-year history of cigarette use. COPDGene participants are between 45 and 80 years of age, span COPD disease severity, and include both sexes from 21 study clinical centers (18). This study presents results from the baseline visit completed by 10,129 participants.

COPDGene conducted an extensive study visit for each participant, collecting demographic data, measures of pulmonary function before and after inhaled bronchodilator, health-related quality of life, and chest CT. Demographic data were collected using a modified American Thoracic Society (ATS) Respiratory Epidemiology Questionnaire. Diabetes status was determined using the question, “Has a doctor ever told you that you have diabetes?” or diabetes-specific medication use was determined with an open-ended question, “List all medications, including those for your lungs, you take that have been prescribed by your health care provider (physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant).” This open-ended question was queried for any drugs specific to diabetes by drug name and class. Common misspellings were considered where observed. All drugs in the biguanide, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, meglitinide, α-glucosidase inhibitor, incretin mimetic, DPP-4 inhibitor, amylin analogue, and insulin families were identified, and if a patient did not report diabetes but did report one of these drugs, they were classified as having diabetes. Type 1 and 2 diabetes were combined for these analyses given the similarity in pulmonary function reduction reported in the literature. The age structure of the COPDGene population and medication use pattern suggest that the majority of diabetes in this population is likely type 2 diabetes.

Spirometry was measured using the ndd EasyOne Spirometer, and all tests were performed according guidelines published by the ATS (19). A successful session included three acceptable maneuvers where the two best measures for FEV1 and FVC were within 150 mL of each other. Based on a standardized review process, spirometry studies that did not meet these criteria were selected for inclusion or exclusion. Other assessments included a measure of quality of life—the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Overall and subscores were calculated using the appropriate standard protocol (20). Dyspnea was measured using the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC) using the standard scoring protocol. Exercise capacity was assessed using the maximum distance a study subject could walk on an unobstructed, flat, indoor course in 6 min. Subjects were supervised by a trained researcher according to ATS guidelines (21).

Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS system, version 9.3 (2002–2008 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Univariate comparisons were performed in normally distributed variables using a Student t test, nonnormally distributed variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using χ2. Multivariable comparisons were performed using Proc GLIMMIX least squares means controlled for the random effect of study center, and all P values were two sided, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Multivariate models of pulmonary function, quality of life, and 6-min walk distance across COPD GOLD stages were conducted using the method above, controlling for age, sex, current smoking status, pack-years of smoking, ethnicity, and BMI, and the levels of each measure were obtained using least squares means. Multivariate models using FEV1% predicted and FVC% predicted did not include sex and ethnicity as these covariates were accounted for in the sex- and race-specific prediction equations (22).

Results

Thisanalysis reports on 10,129 participants recruited by the COPDGene Study with GOLD stage 1, 2, 3, or 4 (n = 4,484; 13% with diabetes), smoking controls without COPD (n = 4,388; 12% with diabetes), and unclassified spirometric abnormalities (GOLD undefined) (n = 1,257; 22% with diabetes). Fifty-four participants without physician diagnosis of diabetes were classified as having diabetes using their medications alone, and 80% (n = 43) reported use of biguanides alone (metformin or glucophage) and none reported using insulin. In the participants reporting physician diagnosis of diabetes, 41% reported no medication use and 71% reported treatment with a single drug. Of those reporting single drug use, 63% (n = 329) reported use of a biguanide alone and 17% reported insulin alone.

As expected, those having diabetes were older, were more likely to be male, had a greater average BMI, had a greater report of breathlessness (higher dyspnea score), and were more likely to have serious pulmonary exacerbations (AECOPD) and pulmonary exacerbations more frequently if they had COPD or were GOLD undefined (Table 1). Among COPD case subjects and smoking control subjects, African Americans had a greater prevalence of diabetes than NHW (16 vs. 12%, P = 0.001, and 13 vs. 11%, P = 0.002). Those with diabetes had greater pack-years of smoking history (59 vs. 51%, P < 0.0001 in COPD subjects; 41 vs. 37%, P = 0.0002 in control subjects; and 49 vs. 41%, P < 0.0001 in GOLD-undefined subjects).

Table 1

Demographic measures

Among smokers without obstructive disease, FEV1%, FVC, and FVC% were significantly lower in those with diabetes (Table 2), and this was also true for spirometric measures in GOLD-undefined individuals. Among COPD case subjects (GOLD 1–4), FEV1 (in liters) was not different by diabetes status overall (−0.02 L [95% CI −0.05 to 0.006], P = 0.1) or in individual comparisons within GOLD stages. FVC was significantly lower in participants with diabetes overall (−0.10 L [−0.14 to −0.05], P < 0.0001) and was significantly decreased in GOLD-undefined, smoking control, and GOLD 2 subjects. Both FEV1% and FVC% were significantly decreased overall in participants with diabetes (−0.8% [95% CI −1.5 to −0.06], P = 0.03, and −2.8% [−3.7 to −1.9], P < 0.0001). Smoking control and GOLD-unclassified subjects showed reduction in FEV1% and FVC%; however, FEV1% was not reduced in COPD. FVC% was reduced in GOLD stages 2 and 3 but not stage 4. FEV1/FVC ratio was increased in those with diabetes overall (0.13 [95% CI 0.009–0.02], P < 0.0001); statistically significant increases in FEV1/FVC ratio were observed among GOLD 2 and 3 subjects but not among other COPD groups.

Table 2

Pulmonary function and outcome measures

Exercise capacity, as measured by 6-min walk distance, was significantly reduced (−90.2 feet [95% CI −115.3 to −65.1], P < 0.0001) in individuals with diabetes across all lung function categories. Walk distance reduction ranged between 45.6 and 129.3 feet and was consistently decreased in participants with diabetes (Fig. 2). Quality of life as measured by SGRQ, a pulmonary-specific questionnaire, was significantly worse (higher score) in those with diabetes overall (3.3 points [95% CI 2.0–4.7], P < 0.0001) and among those participants with diabetes, without COPD, GOLD undefined, and GOLD 2–3 but not among those with GOLD 1 or 4.

Figure 2

The results of the 6-min walk test in feet by GOLD classification and diabetes status. Levels are least squares means adjusted for study site, age, sex, smoking status, pack-years of smoking, BMI, diabetes, GOLD stage, and the interaction between diabetes and GOLD stage. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001.

Conclusions

In the COPDGene population, we found that diabetes is associated with decreased lung function in current and former smokers with a >10–pack-year history of smoking who do not have obstructive lung disease. The magnitude of the differences we observed was small but in keeping with previous studies of pulmonary function conducted primarily in populations with less overall smoking exposure. This decrease in function is manifest in all Pulmonary Function Test (PFT)-based measures in our study, with the exception of FEV1.These participants also exhibit reduced 6-min walk distance and worse quality of life.

Participants with COPD also show reduced pulmonary function by several measures, including reduced 6-min walk distance. GOLD-unclassified participants show the most consistent effect of diabetes, with all measures showing reduction. As COPD severity worsened, there were fewer differences in pulmonary function measures related to diabetes, with GOLD 2 showing significantly lower pulmonary function among three PFT parameters (FVC, FVC% predicted, and FEV1/FVC ratio) (Table 2). Among GOLD 3 individuals, there were two functional parameters that were significantly reduced in diabetes (FVC% predicted and FEV1/FVC). In GOLD 4 individuals, none of the functional measures were significantly lower in diabetes. The overall picture of the effect of diabetes on pulmonary function is of small reductions exhibiting important effects on functional capacity and quality of life. The pattern observed in these participants is restrictive, e.g., lower FVC and higher FEV1/FVC, which is consistent with potential biological mechanisms, such as collagen cross-linking in the lung associated with glycemic dysregulation and AGE exposure.

A meta-analysis conducted by van den Borst et al. (5) demonstrated a pooled estimate of reduction in FEV1% of 5.07%, reduction in FVC% of 6.31%, and increase in FEV1/FVC of 0.12. This study included limited numbers of current smokers and lacked data regarding former smoke exposure. Our study explores a population exposed to substantial cumulative smoke exposure (≥10 pack-years) and reports smaller but comparable reductions in former smokers, reduction in FEV1% of 1.90%, reduction in FVC% of 2.30%, and increase in FEV1/FVC of 0.01. In participants with COPD, FEV1% reduction was lower than in smoking control subjects and reduction in FVC% was higher than in smoking control subjects but did not reach the difference observed in the meta-analysis (Table 2). GOLD-unclassified subjects also showed similar levels of reduction that did not reach the levels observed in that study. The magnitude of the differences observed that is attributable to diabetes might be expected to be reduced given the large effect of smoking. This is also true of the COPD lung where the restrictive effect of diabetes might be hypothesized to be masked by smoking and obstructive disease. Our observation of significant functional reduction, worse quality of life, and 6-min walk distance in participants with COPD underscores the importance of diabetes on the pulmonary system, which may not be appreciated using spirometry alone.

The COPDGene Study differs in important ways from the studies used in the systematic review and meta-analysis, primarily in that it represents heavy smoking exposure and measures diabetes in a less than optimal fashion. The study design allows us to compensate somewhat for an imprecise measurement of diabetes in that self-report of diabetes in 10,129 participants is highly unlikely to be biased to such an extent that it influences the outcome, and incorrect report of diabetes diagnosis would bias our results in a conservative direction. Participants with undiagnosed and untreated diabetes would likely have worse glycemic control than participants who were treated, and this would likely also generate bias in a conservative direction. Our observation of medication use in participants reporting diabetes is comparable to that reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (23). The size of the study also allows a very precise measure of pulmonary function, and the emphasis of COPDGene on pulmonary outcomes ensures that the outcome was measured consistently. The data reported are cross-sectional and likely include a survival bias and are subject to the weaknesses inherent in that type of study design.

Patients with diabetes receiving simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation showed significantly improved pulmonary function measured by FEV1 but not measured by FVC or total lung capacity (7). This suggests that the elimination of diabetes improved pulmonary function without directly affecting lung structure, implying an effect of the diabetic milieu on pulmonary function irrespective of the pulmonary damage associated with smoking. Diabetes represents a disruption in glycemic control and increased exposure to AGEs. The receptor for AGEs (RAGE) has been shown to localize to the basal cell membrane of alveolar type 1 epithelial cells (24). Genetic studies confirm an association between polymorphisms in the AGER gene and reductions in pulmonary function without considering the effect of diabetes (25). This suggests that altered function of RAGE may play an important role in the restrictive lung disease observed in diabetes. A reduction in exercise capacity has been observed in patients with diabetes, and this reduction has been shown to be associated with microvascular blood flow defects at the muscle (26) as well as cardiac dysfunction (27). This reduction in capillary blood volume has also been observed in studies of gas transfer in people with diabetes (28). Diabetes is the leading cause of neuropathies in humans, and one target is the phrenic nerve. Diabetic phrenic neuropathy has been shown to present as respiratory weakness (14) or failure (29) and to occur before the onset of frank diabetes (13). Whereas this study is not able to assess phrenic neuropathy, future studies should consider subsymptomatic phrenic dysfunction related to diabetes. This study also shows significant dyspnea and AECOPD and a higher frequency of pulmonary exacerbations related to diabetes, suggesting that diabetes is directly related to serious lung problems beyond those discussed above. Lastly, 6-min walk distance measures both pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of COPD. Spruit et al. (30) showed that patients that were unable to exceed 1,095 feet in walk distance were at increased risk of death, and an individual experiencing a reduction in walk distance of 98.4 feet has been shown to be at increased risk for death (31). Our study shows a decrease in walk distance in participants with diabetes overall of 90.2 feet (95% CI 115.3–65.1, P < 0.0001). The magnitude of this decreased functional capacity suggests serious increased risk of death for participants with diabetes and COPD. Annual assessment of 6-min walk distance in patients with diabetes may represent an important and cost-effective addition to commonly measured clinical markers.

Pulmonary function in patients with ≥10 pack-years of smoking and diabetes is reduced, and this decrease is associated with significant reductions in activity-related quality of life and exercise capacity. This reduction is evident in those with and without COPD and in participants without defined obstructive lung disease. Additional work is needed to understand the influence of the biological pathways linking diabetes and reduced pulmonary function in order to identify appropriate treatments that consider both diabetes and COPD.