Haiden A Huskamp1, David G Stevenson, A James O'Malley, Stacie B Dusetzina, Susan L Mitchell, Barbara J Zarowitz, Michael E Chernew, Joseph P Newhouse. 1. *Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA †The Dartmouth Institute and Geisel Medical School at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH ‡Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine §Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health ∥Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC ¶Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Deaconess Medical Center #Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA **Omnicare Inc., Livonia, MI ††Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston ‡‡Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:In 2006, dual-eligible nursing home residents were randomly assigned to a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan (PDP). Subsequently, residents not enrolled in qualified plans at the start of the next year were rerandomized. PDPs vary in generosity through differences in medication coverage and utilization management. Therefore, residents' assigned plans may be relatively more or less generous for their particular drugs. The impact of generosity on residents' medication use and health outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Using data from 2005 to 2008, we estimated logistic regression models of the impact of coverage and utilization management on the risk for medication changes and gaps in use, hospitalizations, and death among elderly nursing home residents using 1 of 6 selected drug classes, adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Few current medication users faced noncoverage of their drug (0.4% to 8.7%) or prior authorization or step therapy requirements if the drug was covered (1.1% to 37.4%). After adjusting for individual-level covariates, residents with noncovered drugs were more likely than residents with covered drugs to change medications in most classes studied (eg, for 2006 angiotensin receptor blocker users, the adjusted average probability of medication change was 0.35 when uncovered vs. 0.11 when covered). Those subjected to prior authorization or step therapy were more likely to change in a subset of classes. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of hospitalization or death after correcting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The Part D benefit's special protections for nursing home residents may have ameliorated the health impact of coverage limits on this frail elderly population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In 2006, dual-eligible nursing home residents were randomly assigned to a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan (PDP). Subsequently, residents not enrolled in qualified plans at the start of the next year were rerandomized. PDPs vary in generosity through differences in medication coverage and utilization management. Therefore, residents' assigned plans may be relatively more or less generous for their particular drugs. The impact of generosity on residents' medication use and health outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Using data from 2005 to 2008, we estimated logistic regression models of the impact of coverage and utilization management on the risk for medication changes and gaps in use, hospitalizations, and death among elderly nursing home residents using 1 of 6 selected drug classes, adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Few current medication users faced noncoverage of their drug (0.4% to 8.7%) or prior authorization or step therapy requirements if the drug was covered (1.1% to 37.4%). After adjusting for individual-level covariates, residents with noncovered drugs were more likely than residents with covered drugs to change medications in most classes studied (eg, for 2006 angiotensin receptor blocker users, the adjusted average probability of medication change was 0.35 when uncovered vs. 0.11 when covered). Those subjected to prior authorization or step therapy were more likely to change in a subset of classes. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of hospitalization or death after correcting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The Part D benefit's special protections for nursing home residents may have ameliorated the health impact of coverage limits on this frail elderly population.
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Michael R Law; Stephen B Soumerai; Amy Johnson Graves; Robert F LeCates; Fang Zhang; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Alyce S Adams Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Stephen B Soumerai; Fang Zhang; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Daniel E Ball; Robert F LeCates; Michael R Law; Tom E Hughes; Daniel Chapman; Alyce S Adams Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Becky A Briesacher; Stephen B Soumerai; Terry S Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yuting Zhang; Julie M Donohue; Judith R Lave; Gerald O'Donnell; Joseph P Newhouse Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wesley Yin; Anirban Basu; James X Zhang; Atonu Rabbani; David O Meltzer; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David G Stevenson; A James O'Malley; Stacie B Dusetzina; Susan L Mitchell; Barbara J Zarowitz; Michael E Chernew; Joseph P Newhouse; Haiden A Huskamp Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert Nee; John S Thurlow; Keith C Norris; Christina Yuan; Maura A Watson; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Kevin C Abbott Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Kevin M Fain; G Caleb Alexander; David D Dore; Jodi B Segal; Andrew R Zullo; Carlos Castillo-Salgado Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 7.538