| Literature DB >> 24023726 |
Sinh Thi Tran1, John Patrick Renschler, Hai Thanh Le, Hang Thi Thu Dang, Tuan Minh Dao, An Nhat Pham, Liem Thanh Nguyen, Hung Van Nguyen, Thuy Thi Thu Nguyen, Sy Ngoc Le, Annette Fox, Maxine Caws, Nhu Thi Quynh Nguyen, Nhudo Thi Quynh, Peter Horby, Heiman Wertheim.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Microscopic [corrected] Observation Drug Susceptibility (MODS) has been shown to be an effective and rapid technique for early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). Thus far only a limited number of studies evaluating MODS have been performed in children and in extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. This study aims to assess relative accuracy and time to positive culture of MODS for TB diagnosis in children admitted to a general pediatric hospital in Vietnam. METHODS/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24023726 PMCID: PMC3762843 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Study Design.
Figure 2Patient Recruitment and Assignment to ‘confirmed TB’, ‘probable TB’, or ‘TB unlikely’ group.
Demographic characteristics of patients.
| Category | Subcategory | Total Population N = 705 | Confirmed N = 44 | Probable N = 69 | Unlikely N = 592 | Comparison* |
| Age | Median (IQR) | 2 (1–48) | 23 (2–87) | 36 (1–96) | 2 (1–42) | P<0.001 [P1 = 0.995; P2 = 0.001; P3 = 0.003] |
| <5 years | 545 (77.3) | 29 (65.9) | 41 (59.4) | 475 (80.2) | P<0.001 [P1 = 0.544; P2<0.001; P3 = 0.033] | |
| Sex | Male | 463 (65.7) | 22 (50) | 48 (69.6) | 391 (66) | P = 0.073 |
| BCG Vaccination | Yes | 393 (55.7) | 26 (59.1) | 39 (56.5) | 328 (55.4) | .. |
| No | 44 (6.2) | 5 (11.3) | 5 (7.2) | 34 (5.7) | P = 0.310 | |
| Unknown | 268 (38) | 13 (29.5) | 25 (36.2) | 230 (38.9) | .. | |
| HIV Status | Positive | 65 (9.2) | 8 (18.2) | 11 (15.9) | 46 (7.7) | P = 0.009 [P1 = 0.8; P2 = 0.037; P3 = 0.025] |
| Negative | 279 (39.6) | 17 (38.6) | 36 (52.2) | 226 (38.2) | .. | |
| Unknown | 361 (51.2) | 19 (43.2) | 22 (31.9) | 320 (54.1) | .. | |
| TB Contact | Yes | 46 (6.5) | 7 (15.9) | 12 (17.4) | 27 (4.6) | P<0.001 [P1 = 1; P2<0.001; P3 = 0.006] |
| Yes & Contact was household family member | 37 (80.4) | 7 (100) | 11 (91.7) | 19 (70.1) | P = 0.111 | |
| No | 440 (62.4) | 28 (63.6) | 35 (50.7) | 377 (63.7) | .. | |
| Unknown | 219 (31.1) | 9 (20.5) | 22 (31.9) | 188 (31.8) | .. |
Summary measure for categorical data is n (%). * P is used to compare across all three groups (confirmed, probable, and unlikely). For continuous variables a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used. When P<0.05 Fisher's Exact test was used to compare confirmed with probable (P1), probable with unlikely (P2), and confirmed with unlikely (P3). For continuous variables a Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for P1, P2, and P3 calculations.
Clinical features of 590 pediatric TB suspects.
| Characteristic | Total Population N = 590 | Confirmed N = 41 | Probable N = 62 | Unlikely N = 487 | Comparison |
| Cough | 435 (73.7) | 32 (78.0) | 48 (77.4) | 355 (72.9) | P = 0.6048 |
| Fever | 473 (80.2) | 37 (90.2) | 52 (83.9) | 384 (78.9) | P = 0.158 |
| Malnutrition | 186 (31.5) | 23 (56.1) | 17 (27.4) | 146 (30.0) | P = 0.001 [P1 = 0.003; P2 = 0.117; P3 = 0.001] |
| Weightloss | 133 (22.5) | 18 (43.9) | 10 (16.1) | 105 (21.6) | P = 0.002 [P1 = 0.003; P2 = 0.41; P3 = 0.003] |
| Lymphadenopathy | 70 (11.9) | 9 (22.0) | 11 (17.7) | 50 (10.3) | P = 0.027 [P1 = 0.619; P2 = 0.086; P3 = 0.035] |
| Meningitis | 137 (23.2) | 21 (51.2) | 12 (19.3) | 104 (21.4) | P<0.001 [P1 = 0.001; P2 = 0.869; P<0.001] |
| Chest X-ray suspected of TB | 156 (26.4) | 18 (43.9) | 32 (51.6) | 106 (21.8) | P<0.001 [P1 = 0.546; P2<0.001; P3 = 0.003] |
| History of Illness: median (IQR) | 14 (8 – 20) | 14 (8 – 20) | 15 (10 – 25) | 14 (8 – 24) | P = 0.639 |
Summary measure for categorical data is n (%).
P is used to compare across all three groups (confirmed, probable, and unlikely). For continuous variables a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used. When P<0.05 Fisher's Exact test was used to compare confirmed with probable (P1) , probable with unlikely (P2), and confirmed with unlikely (P3).
Sensitivity of MODS, LJ culture, and smear against clinical reference standard.
| Sensitivity n (%) [95% CI] | P-Value | ||||
| MODS | LJ | Smear | vs LJ | vs Smear | |
|
| 52 (46) [36.6, 55.6] | 44 (38.9) [29.9, 48.6] | 10 (8.8) [4.3, 15.7] | 0.019 | <0.001 |
|
| 69 (35.3) [28.7, 42.5] | 59 (30.3) [23.9, 37.2] | 11 (5.6) [2.8, 9.8] | 0.015 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Sputum (N = 23) | 8 (34.8) [16.4, 57.3] | 7 (30.4) [13.2, 52.9] | 1 (4.3) [0.1, 21.9] | 0.500 | 0.008 |
| Gastric aspirate (N = 103) | 28 (27.2) [19, 36.8] | 20 (19.4) [12.3, 28.4] | 3 (2.9) [0.6, 8.3] | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| CSF (N = 33) | 22 (66.6) [48.1, 82] | 22 (66.6) [48.1, 82] | 3 (9.1) [1.9, 24.3] | 0.688 | <0.001 |
The sensitivities of MODS, LJ culture, and smear were calculated against the clinical reference standard. Sensitivities were calculated by all samples (some patients provided more than one sample), by patient, and by sample type. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Comparison of sensitivities using Exact McNemar's Test: MODS vs LJ and MODS vs Smear.
Figure 3Paired Time to Detection by MODS and LJ Culture.