PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in pelvic floor anatomy using MRI before and after continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen men with prostate cancer who underwent RP (mean age, 67.4 ± 8.8 years) volunteered for this study. Prostate MRIs were performed during the preoperative (i), incontinent (ii), and continent (iii) periods. The membranous urethra length (MUL), puborectalis muscle (PRM) thickness, and the position of the bladder neck in relation to the pubic bone (Dx) and the pubococcygeous line (Dy) were measured. We compared all parameters in the preoperative, incontinent, and continent periods. RESULTS: MUL2 and MUL3 was significantly longer compared with MUL1, although no difference was found between MUL2 and MUL3. PRM3 thickness was significantly increased compared with PRM2 thickness. The Dx of the continence period was shorter than that of the incontinence period. The Dy of the continence period was longer than that of the incontinence period. CONCLUSION: The PRM thickened and the bladder neck moved upward and forward during the continence period. The changes in PRM thickness and the position of bladder neck may play an important role in the recovery of continence after RP.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in pelvic floor anatomy using MRI before and after continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen men with prostate cancer who underwent RP (mean age, 67.4 ± 8.8 years) volunteered for this study. Prostate MRIs were performed during the preoperative (i), incontinent (ii), and continent (iii) periods. The membranous urethra length (MUL), puborectalis muscle (PRM) thickness, and the position of the bladder neck in relation to the pubic bone (Dx) and the pubococcygeous line (Dy) were measured. We compared all parameters in the preoperative, incontinent, and continent periods. RESULTS: MUL2 and MUL3 was significantly longer compared with MUL1, although no difference was found between MUL2 and MUL3. PRM3 thickness was significantly increased compared with PRM2 thickness. The Dx of the continence period was shorter than that of the incontinence period. The Dy of the continence period was longer than that of the incontinence period. CONCLUSION: The PRM thickened and the bladder neck moved upward and forward during the continence period. The changes in PRM thickness and the position of bladder neck may play an important role in the recovery of continence after RP.
Authors: Antonio Tienza; Mateo Hevia; Alberto Benito; Juan I Pascual; Juan Javier Zudaire; Jose Enrique Robles Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Abdullah M Alenizi; Kevin C Zorn; Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Naif Alhathal; Assaad El-Hakim Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Jesse W Tai; Samuel R Sorkhi; Ishika Trivedi; Kyoko Sakamoto; Michael Albo; Valmik Bhargava; Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.400
Authors: Hong Koo Ha; Henk B Luiting; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Sean F Mungovan Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 2.264