Literature DB >> 24019661

Recurrent giant cell tumor of foot detected by F18-FDG PET/CT.

Kuruva Manohar1, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Anish Bhattacharya, Ramesh Sen.   

Abstract

Detection of recurrence of tumors with conventional imaging like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be difficult because of distorted anatomy and implants in situ. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT has been shown to be very useful in detection of recurrent tumors with higher accuracy than conventional imaging method. Giant cell tumors of foot though rare have high recurrence potential after initial curative treatment. However, currently there is no literature addressing the role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in evaluation of these tumors. We report a case of post excisional recurrent giant cell tumor of foot diagnosed on F-18 FDG PET/CT. In addition, to detection of recurrence F-18 FDG PET/CT also aided in accurate management of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  F-18 FDG; PET/CT; giant cell tumor; recurrence

Year:  2012        PMID: 24019661      PMCID: PMC3759092          DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.115402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0974-0244


INTRODUCTION

Giant cell tumors of foot are uncommon and have been reported to have an incidence of less than 4% of all the locations[1] and typically have a varied natural history ranging from entirely benign to highly malignant behavior with distant metastases.[23] Surgery offers the best chance of cure in patients with localized disease. However, after curative local treatment giant cell tumors (GCTs) of foot and have high incidence of recurrence ranging from 10 to 47%.[34] Detection of recurrence with conventional imaging like CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be difficult because of distorted anatomy and implants in situ following surgery. Functional imaging has a definite role in detection of recurrence in such cases. Here, we report a case of recurrent GCT of foot detected on F18-FDG PET/CT.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old female patient diagnosed to have GCT of right foot was subjected to excision, curettage and arthrodesis of ankle joint. Six months post-surgery she presented with increasing pain in right foot and recurrence was suspected. MRI could not be carried out due to surgical implant in situ. Total body F-18 FDG PET/CT acquired 60 min after intravenous injection of 10.2 mCi of F18-FDG was performed for detection of recurrence. Diagnostic quality CT images were acquired as part of the study. It showed intense uptake of FDG in soft-tissues in right hind foot along the anterior and medial surface of the right ankle joint. FDG uptake was also seen to involve the inferior surface of talus, cuboid, lateral and intermediate cuneiform, navicular, talus and calcaneum bones of the foot [Figure 1]. However, exact soft-tissue delineation was not possible due to surgical implant in situ leading to artefacts on CT. Later patient underwent biopsy from the suspected area, which confirmed recurrence. Patient was subsequently subjected to below knee amputation due to involvement of talar bone. Histopathologically the amputated specimen showed giant cell tumor of intermediate grade with involvement of inferior surface of talus, cuboid, lateral and intermediate cuneiform bones, navicular, and calcaneum correlating exactly with the F18-FDG PET/CT findings.
Figure 1

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (a) maximum intensity projection image of lower limbs showing intense tracer uptake in right hindfoot around the ankle joint. FDG uptake is seen to extend into the lower one third of the leg on medial side (b) transaxial images through the feet show intense FDG uptake in soft tissue mass in right foot (c) transaxial images showing intense FDG uptake in lower surface of talus

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (a) maximum intensity projection image of lower limbs showing intense tracer uptake in right hindfoot around the ankle joint. FDG uptake is seen to extend into the lower one third of the leg on medial side (b) transaxial images through the feet show intense FDG uptake in soft tissue mass in right foot (c) transaxial images showing intense FDG uptake in lower surface of talus

DISCUSSION

Foot and ankle giant cell tumors have increased rate of local recurrence. Early and accurate detection of recurrence is important to decide upon accurate management. Conventional imaging modalities are known to be of limited utility in detecting recurrence due to distortion of anatomy post-surgery and also by the presence of metallic implants in many tumors. Functional imaging modalities have a definite role in such situations. One study by Shimizu et al. highlighted the better performance of functional imaging with Gallium scintigraphy over anatomical imaging modalities in prediction of recurrence.[5] F-18 FDG uptake in GCTs has been described and GCTs are known to be highly F-18 FDG avid.[6] Few case reports have demonstrated the utility of FDG PET in evaluation of multi-centric GCTs.[7] However, to best of our knowledge there is no literature addressing the utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in detection of recurrent GCTs of foot. Advantages of F-18 FDG PET over gallium scintigraphy include superior resolution and better images. Fusion with CT has always helped in improving the accuracy of interpretation of functional imaging in the foot.[8] Stand-alone CT might have limitations in accurately detecting the recurrence but in conjunction with F-18 FDG PET it definitely helps in accurate localization of uptake to specific bone, which may have implications in appropriate management. Detection of involvement of talus is important in case of foot as it favors an amputation against conservative approach limiting to excision of tumor.[5] In our case, involvement of talus was also noted and was one of the factor favoring amputation.

CONCLUSION

Giant cell tumors of foot though rare can recur early post-treatment. Combined anatomical and functional information obtained from CT and F-18 FDG PET in one investigation – FDG PET/CT aids in accurate detection of recurrence and thereby directing appropriate management of recurrent giant cell tumors. We also propose that F-18 FDG PET/CT can be used as primary modality in evaluating the patients with suspicion of recurrent GCT of foot.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Metachronous, multicentric giant cell tumor of the sphenoid bone with histologic, CT, MR imaging, and positron-emission tomography/CT correlation.

Authors:  A M McKinney; P Reichert; J Short; T Dhurairaj; K SantaCruz; Z McKinney; S Kieffer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Recurrence potential of diffuse-type giant cell tumor in the foot: radiologic and pathologic features.

Authors:  Tominaga Shimizu; Takeshi Uehara; Tsutomu Akahane; Kenichi Isobe; Hideki Arai
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 3.  SPECT/CT in imaging foot and ankle pathology-the demise of other coregistration techniques.

Authors:  Hosahalli K Mohan; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Sanjay Vijayanathan; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  K M Yip; P C Leung; S M Kumta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Giant cell tumor of the bones of the hand and foot.

Authors:  R Biscaglia; P Bacchini; F Bertoni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  18F-FDG kinetics and gene expression in giant cell tumors.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Dirk Koczan; Ludger Bernd; Uwe Haberkorn; Volker Ewerbeck; Hans-Jürgen Thiesen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Giant cell tumor of bone in the foot and ankle.

Authors:  R J O'Keefe; R J O'Donnell; H T Temple; S P Scully; H J Mankin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.827

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Benign tumours of the bone: A review.

Authors:  David N Hakim; Theo Pelly; Myutan Kulendran; Jochem A Caris
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.072

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.