Literature DB >> 24019469

Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses.

Seung Ho Chung1, Cristina Rosa, Erin D Scully, Michelle Peiffer, John F Tooker, Kelli Hoover, Dawn S Luthe, Gary W Felton.   

Abstract

Induced plant defenses in response to herbivore attack are modulated by cross-talk between jasmonic acid (JA)- and salicylic acid (SA)-signaling pathways. Oral secretions from some insect herbivores contain effectors that overcome these antiherbivore defenses. Herbivores possess diverse microbes in their digestive systems and these microbial symbionts can modify plant-insect interactions; however, the specific role of herbivore-associated microbes in manipulating plant defenses remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) larvae exploit bacteria in their oral secretions to suppress antiherbivore defenses in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). We found that antibiotic-untreated larvae decreased production of JA and JA-responsive antiherbivore defenses, but increased SA accumulation and SA-responsive gene expression. Beetles benefit from down-regulating plant defenses by exhibiting enhanced larval growth. In SA-deficient plants, suppression was not observed, indicating that suppression of JA-regulated defenses depends on the SA-signaling pathway. Applying bacteria isolated from larval oral secretions to wounded plants confirmed that three microbial symbionts belonging to the genera Stenotrophomonas, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter are responsible for defense suppression. Additionally, reinoculation of these bacteria to antibiotic-treated larvae restored their ability to suppress defenses. Flagellin isolated from Pseudomonas sp. was associated with defense suppression. Our findings show that the herbivore exploits symbiotic bacteria as a decoy to deceive plants into incorrectly perceiving the threat as microbial. By interfering with the normal perception of herbivory, beetles can evade antiherbivore defenses of its host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24019469      PMCID: PMC3785742          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308867110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Phytoplasma protein effector SAP11 enhances insect vector reproduction by manipulating plant development and defense hormone biosynthesis.

Authors:  Akiko Sugio; Heather N Kingdom; Allyson M MacLean; Victoria M Grieve; Saskia A Hogenhout
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The plant immune system.

Authors:  Jonathan D G Jones; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Plant immunity to insect herbivores.

Authors:  Gregg A Howe; Georg Jander
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  Antagonistic plant defense system regulated by phytohormones assists interactions among vector insect, thrips and a tospovirus.

Authors:  Hiroshi Abe; Yasuhiro Tomitaka; Takeshi Shimoda; Shigemi Seo; Tamito Sakurai; Soichi Kugimiya; Shinya Tsuda; Masatomo Kobayashi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Silverleaf whitefly induces salicylic acid defenses and suppresses effectual jasmonic acid defenses.

Authors:  Sonia I Zarate; Louisa A Kempema; Linda L Walling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Specificity of induced resistance in tomato against specialist lepidopteran and coleopteran species.

Authors:  Seung Ho Chung; Gary W Felton
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Interplay between MAMP-triggered and SA-mediated defense responses.

Authors:  Kenichi Tsuda; Masanao Sato; Jane Glazebrook; Jerry D Cohen; Fumiaki Katagiri
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Molecular identification and characterization of the tomato flagellin receptor LeFLS2, an orthologue of Arabidopsis FLS2 exhibiting characteristically different perception specificities.

Authors:  Silke Robatzek; Pascal Bittel; Delphine Chinchilla; Petra Köchner; Georg Felix; Shin-Han Shiu; Thomas Boller
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 9.  Facultative symbionts in aphids and the horizontal transfer of ecologically important traits.

Authors:  Kerry M Oliver; Patrick H Degnan; Gaelen R Burke; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Insect oral secretions suppress wound-induced responses in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Floriane Consales; Fabian Schweizer; Matthias Erb; Caroline Gouhier-Darimont; Natacha Bodenhausen; Friederike Bruessow; Islam Sobhy; Philippe Reymond
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  123 in total

1.  Plant-mediated effects on an insect-pathogen interaction vary with intraspecific genetic variation in plant defences.

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano; Ketia L Shumaker; Michelle Peiffer; Gary W Felton; Kelli Hoover
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Colorado potato beetle manipulates plant defenses in local and systemic leaves.

Authors:  Seung Ho Chung; Cristina Rosa; Kelli Hoover; Dawn S Luthe; Gary W Felton
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2013-12-31

3.  Microbial ecology: a bacterial decoy skews plant defences.

Authors:  Christina Tobin Kåhrström
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Organic Soils Control Beetle Survival While Competitors Limit Aphid Population Growth.

Authors:  Karol L Krey; Carmen K Blubaugh; James T Van Leuven; William E Snyder
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.377

5.  Gut microbes may facilitate insect herbivory of chemically defended plants.

Authors:  Tobin J Hammer; M Deane Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Mechanisms and ecological consequences of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities.

Authors:  M R Kant; W Jonckheere; B Knegt; F Lemos; J Liu; B C J Schimmel; C A Villarroel; L M S Ataide; W Dermauw; J J Glas; M Egas; A Janssen; T Van Leeuwen; R C Schuurink; M W Sabelis; J M Alba
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  Evolutionary Ecology of Multitrophic Interactions between Plants, Insect Herbivores and Entomopathogens.

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.

Authors:  Janet Therrien; Charles J Mason; Jonathan A Cale; Aaron Adams; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Kenneth F Raffa; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Pathogen-triggered ethylene signaling mediates systemic-induced susceptibility to herbivory in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman; Adam K Bahrami; Amity M Wilczek; Jianping Cui; Jacob A Russell; Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo; Ian A Butler; Jignasha D Rana; Guo-Hua Huang; Jenifer Bush; Frederick M Ausubel; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Turnabout Is Fair Play: Herbivory-Induced Plant Chitinases Excreted in Fall Armyworm Frass Suppress Herbivore Defenses in Maize.

Authors:  Swayamjit Ray; Patrick C M S Alves; Imtiaz Ahmad; Iffa Gaffoor; Flor E Acevedo; Michelle Peiffer; Shan Jin; Yang Han; Samina Shakeel; Gary W Felton; Dawn S Luthe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.