| Literature DB >> 24019421 |
Sanjay Kinra1, K V Radha Krishna2, Hannah Kuper2, K V Rameshwar Sarma2, Poornima Prabhakaran3, Vipin Gupta2, Gagandeep Kaur Walia2, Santhi Bhogadi2, Bharati Kulkarni3, Aniket Kumar2, Aastha Aggarwal2, Ruby Gupta2, Dorairaj Prabhakaran2, K Srinath Reddy2, George Davey Smith2, Yoav Ben-Shlomo2, Shah Ebrahim3.
Abstract
The Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) was originally established to study the long-term effects of early-life undernutrition on risk of cardiovascular disease. Its aims were subsequently expanded to include trans-generational influences of other environmental and genetic factors on chronic diseases in rural India. It builds on the Hyderabad Nutrition Trial (HNT) conducted in 1987-90 to compare the effects on birthweight of a protein-calorie supplement for pregnant women and children. The index children of HNT and their mothers were retraced and examined in 2003-05, and the children re-examined as young adults aged 18-21 years in 2009-10. The cohort was expanded to include both parents and siblings of the index children in a recently completed follow-up conducted in 2010-12 (N=∼6225 out of 10,213 participants). Recruitment of the remaining residents of these 29 villages (N=∼55,000) in Ranga Reddy district of Andhra Pradesh is now under way. Extensive data on socio-demographic, lifestyle, medical, anthropometric, physiological, vascular and body composition measures, DNA, stored plasma, and assays of lipids and inflammatory markers on APCAPS participants are available. Details of how to access these data are available from the corresponding author.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24019421 PMCID: PMC4190511 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Epidemiol ISSN: 0300-5771 Impact factor: 7.196
Figure 1Flow chart of participants in the retrospective and prospective components of Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS)
Comparison of clinic participants with non-participants at the first (2003–05) and second (2009–10) follow-ups of the Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS)
| 2003–05 | 2009–10 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants ( | Non-participants ( | Participants ( | Non-participants ( | |||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 15.9 (0.9) | 15.5 (1.2) | <0.001 | 21.7 (1.1) | 21.7 (1.1) | 0.09 |
| Female sex, | 537 (46.1) | 743 (51.7) | 0.005 | 459 (31.7) | 822 (71.2) | <0.001 |
| Occupation in 2003–05 | ( | ( | <0.001 | ( | ( | <0.001 |
| Full-time student | 894 (77.5) | 991 (70.4) | 1137 (79.4) | 743 (65.8) | ||
| Full-time employment | 178 (15.4) | 310 (22) | 214 (14.9) | 274 (24.2) | ||
| Other | 82 (7.1) | 107 (7.6) | 76 (5.3) | 113 (10) | ||
| Birthweight (g), mean (SD) | 2667 (424) | 2660 (414) | 0.84 | 2671 (428) | 2656 (411) | 0.86 |
SD, standard deviation.
aValues are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise. P-values are based on unpaired t tests or Χ2 tests for heterogeneity with appropriate degrees of freedom.
bMean age estimated at 1 June 2004 (2003–05 survey) and 1 January 2010 (2009–10 survey).
cBased on fewer subjects: 2003–05, 544 participants, 228 non-participants; 2009–10, 469 participants, 303 non-participants.
Data collection in Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS), 2003–12
| Data | First follow-up (2003–05) | Second follow-up (2009–10) | Third follow-up (2010–12) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participant | Index child (birth linkage), mother | Index child | Index child, parents, siblings |
| Questionnaire | Socio-demographics Social position (full SLI) Lifestyle e.g. diet, activity (brief questionnaires) General health, medical and family history Atopic history Birth, feeding, immunization history (mother) Household details, socio-demographics (mother) | Socio-demographics Social position (brief SLI) Lifestyle (full questionnaires) General health, medical and family history Mental health Reproductive health (women) | Socio-demographics Social position (brief SLI) Lifestyle (full questionnaires) General health, medical and family history Mental health Reproductive health (women) |
| Body composition | Anthropometry (child/mother), skin folds Pubertal status | Anthropometry, skin folds Grip strength DXA scan | Anthropometry, skin folds Grip strength Bio-impedance, DXA scan (subset) |
| Vascular | Blood pressure Arterial stiffness | Blood pressure Arterial stiffness Carotid intima-media thickness | Blood pressure Arterial stiffness Carotid intima-media thickness |
| Respiratory | Lung function | Lung function | Lung function |
| Biological sample | Fasting blood sugar, lipids, insulin DNA (Selected SNPs) | Fasting blood sugar, lipids, insulin Liver, bone function, vitamin D Saliva | Fasting blood sugar, lipids, insulin Liver, bone function, CRP Saliva |
SLI: Standard of Living Index scale.
aBrief questionnaire and anthropometry only.
bObjective measures of physical activity in a subset.
Association between supplemental nutrition and cardiovascular risk in adolescence: First follow-up of the Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS), 2003–05
| Risk factor | Mean (SD) | Mean difference (95% CI): control minus intervention | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention ( | Control ( | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| % female | 47 | 45 | ||
| Age (years) | 15.8 (0.9) | 15.9 (0.9) | NA | NA |
| Height (mm) | 1159 (83) | 1549 (82) | −10.0 (−18.7 to −1.4) | −13.6 (−23.1 to −4.1) |
| Fat mass index (kg/m2) | 2.6 (1.3) | 2.6 (1.5) | −0.02 (−0.23 to 0.19) | 0.04 (−0.10 to 0.18) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 108.7 (10.3) | 109.6 (10.0) | 0.83 (−1.44 to 3.11) | 0.59 (−1.11 to 2.29) |
| Augmentation index (%) | 2.5 (11.4) | 5.6 (9.4) | 3.16 (0.8 to 5.51) | 3.30 (0.96 to 5.65) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 3.45 (0.69) | 3.45 (0.67) | 0 (−0.12 to 0.12) | −0.02 (−0.11 to 0.08) |
| HOMA score | 3.16 (1 to 10) | 3.79 (1.2 to 11.7) | 0.18 (0.04 to 0.32) | 0.18 (0.03 to 0.33) |
aAdjusted for age, sex, pubertal stage, standard of living index, village population, room temperature (blood pressure) and heart rate (augmentation index).
bHOMA (homeostasis model assessment) score is on log scale (geometric mean/95% reference range presented); 0.18 mean difference equates to 20% (95% CI: 3 to 39%) on the original scale.