Literature DB >> 24018733

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on perception of effort in an isolated isometric elbow flexion task.

Sofia I Lampropoulou1, Alexander V Nowicky.   

Abstract

The purported ergogenic actions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to motor cortex (M1) on force production and perception of effort were investigated using a 10-item numerical rating scale (0-10 NRS) in nonfatiguing bouts of a force-matching task utilizing isometric elbow flexion. Using a crossover design, 12 healthy volunteers received sham, anodal, and cathodal tDCS randomly for 10 min (1.5 mA, 62 μA/cm2) to the left M1 in a double-blind manner. Corticospinal excitability changes were also monitored using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with surface electromyography (sEMG) to monitor both motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and force-EMG from right m. biceps brachii and m. brachioradialis brachii. No significant differences between the verum and sham stimulation were obtained for elbow flexion maximum voluntary force, perception of effort, or sEMG. There were also no significant differences in MEP changes for the types of tDCS, which is consistent with reports that tDCS excitability effects are diminished during ongoing cognitive and motor activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018733     DOI: 10.1123/mcj.17.4.412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  7 in total

1.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain.

Authors:  Luca Angius; James G Hopker; Samuele M Marcora; Alexis R Mauger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Is it time to turn our attention toward central mechanisms for post-exertional recovery strategies and performance?

Authors:  Ben Rattray; Christos Argus; Kristy Martin; Joseph Northey; Matthew Driller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper-Limb Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ronak Patel; James Ashcroft; Ashish Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Adam J Woods; Harsimrat Singh; Ara Darzi; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Electrode Size and Placement for Surface EMG Bipolar Detection from the Brachioradialis Muscle: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrea Merlo; Maria Chiara Bò; Isabella Campanini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Neurostimulation, doping, and the spirit of sport.

Authors:  Jonathan Pugh; Christopher Pugh
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 1.480

7.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Muscle Strength and Endurance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun Hu; Yu Chen; Feng Guo; Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.