Literature DB >> 24018274

Impact of grass/forage feeding versus grain finishing on beef nutrients and sensory quality: the U.S. experience.

Mary E Van Elswyk1, Shalene H McNeill.   

Abstract

Studies of forage and/or grass feeding of cattle versus grain finishing have been conducted in varying regions throughout the world but generalization of these results to beef from U.S. cattle may not be appropriate. In particular, available grass/forage variety and form as well as cattle breed have a significant impact on the nutritional profile of beef. The current review summarizes the nutritional characteristics of beef as reported from the limited number of studies comparing U.S. grass/forage-fed versus grain-finished cattle and estimates the intake of key nutrients that might be expected from consumption of U.S. beef from either feeding system. In addition, many studies report changes in fatty acids solely as a percentage of total fatty acids. Since grass/forage feeding typically results in a leaner product; the current review compares the fatty acid profile of beef from grass/forage feeding to that of grain-finished cattle on a mg/100 g of meat basis.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef; Fatty acids; Feeding system; Nutrient composition; Omega-3; Saturated fat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018274     DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  11 in total

1.  Diet induced the change of mtDNA copy number and metabolism in Angus cattle.

Authors:  Ying Bai; José A Carrillo; Yaokun Li; Yanghua He; Jiuzhou Song
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 2.  Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A TaqMan real-time PCR method based on alternative oxidase genes for detection of plant species in animal feed samples.

Authors:  Maria Doroteia Campos; Vera Valadas; Catarina Campos; Laura Morello; Luca Braglia; Diego Breviario; Hélia G Cardoso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Consumer Acceptability of Intramuscular Fat.

Authors:  Damian Frank; Seon-Tea Joo; Robyn Warner
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Diet selection and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid deposition in lambs as affected by restricted time at pasture.

Authors:  X Q Zhang; Y M Jin; W B Badgery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of Three Feeding Regimens on Blood Fatty Acids Metabolites of Wujumqin Sheep in Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  Yanmei Jin; Xiaoqing Zhang; Jize Zhang; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Fatty Acid Composition of Grain- and Grass-Fed Beef and Their Nutritional Value and Health Implication.

Authors:  Kim Margarette C Nogoy; Bin Sun; Sangeun Shin; Yeonwoo Lee; Xiang Zi Li; Seong Ho Choi; Sungkwon Park
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2022-01-01

8.  Influence of Grain- and Grass-Finishing Systems on Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Consumer Sensory Attributes of Bison.

Authors:  Jessica Janssen; Kristi Cammack; Jerrad Legako; Ryan Cox; J Kyle Grubbs; Keith Underwood; John Hansen; Carter Kruse; Amanda Blair
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 9.  Improving the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Crops.

Authors:  Nicola M Capstaff; Anthony J Miller
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.

Authors:  Rhonda Miller
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.