OBJECTIVES: There are few systematic assessments of street-obtained buprenorphine use from community-based samples in the United States. The objective of this study was to characterize the prevalence, correlates, and reasons for street-obtained buprenorphine use among current and former injection drug users (IDUs) in Baltimore, Maryland. METHODS: In 2008, participants of the ALIVE (AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience) study, a community-based cohort of IDUs, were administered a survey on buprenorphine. Street-obtained buprenorphine represented self-reported use of buprenorphine obtained from the street or a friend in the prior three months. RESULTS: Six hundred and two respondents were predominantly male (65%), African-American (91%), and 30% were HIV-positive. Overall, nine percent reported recent street-obtained buprenorphine use, and only 2% reported using to get high. Among active opiate users, 23% reported recent use of street-obtained buprenorphine. Use of buprenorphine prescribed by a physician, injection and non-injection drug use, use of street-obtained methadone and prescription opiates, homelessness, and opioid withdrawal symptoms were positively associated, while methadone treatment, health insurance, outpatient care, and HIV-infection were negatively associated with recent street-obtained buprenorphine use in univariate analysis. After adjustment, active injection and heroin use were positively associated with street-obtained buprenorphine use. Ninety-one percent reported using street-obtained buprenorphine to manage withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: While 9% reported recent street-obtained buprenorphine use, only a small minority reported using buprenorphine to get high, with the majority reporting use to manage withdrawal symptoms. There is limited evidence of diversion of buprenorphine in this sample and efforts to expand buprenorphine treatment should continue with further monitoring.
OBJECTIVES: There are few systematic assessments of street-obtained buprenorphine use from community-based samples in the United States. The objective of this study was to characterize the prevalence, correlates, and reasons for street-obtained buprenorphine use among current and former injection drug users (IDUs) in Baltimore, Maryland. METHODS: In 2008, participants of the ALIVE (AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience) study, a community-based cohort of IDUs, were administered a survey on buprenorphine. Street-obtained buprenorphine represented self-reported use of buprenorphine obtained from the street or a friend in the prior three months. RESULTS: Six hundred and two respondents were predominantly male (65%), African-American (91%), and 30% were HIV-positive. Overall, nine percent reported recent street-obtained buprenorphine use, and only 2% reported using to get high. Among active opiate users, 23% reported recent use of street-obtained buprenorphine. Use of buprenorphine prescribed by a physician, injection and non-injection drug use, use of street-obtained methadone and prescription opiates, homelessness, and opioid withdrawal symptoms were positively associated, while methadone treatment, health insurance, outpatient care, and HIV-infection were negatively associated with recent street-obtained buprenorphine use in univariate analysis. After adjustment, active injection and heroin use were positively associated with street-obtained buprenorphine use. Ninety-one percent reported using street-obtained buprenorphine to manage withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: While 9% reported recent street-obtained buprenorphine use, only a small minority reported using buprenorphine to get high, with the majority reporting use to manage withdrawal symptoms. There is limited evidence of diversion of buprenorphine in this sample and efforts to expand buprenorphine treatment should continue with further monitoring.
Authors: Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Cynthia L Arfken; Salvatore di Menza; Charles Roberts Schuster Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-08-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nabarun Dasgupta; Elise J Bailey; Theodore Cicero; James Inciardi; Mark Parrino; Andrew Rosenblum; Richard C Dart Journal: Pain Med Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Becky L Genberg; Stephen J Gange; Vivian F Go; David D Celentano; Gregory D Kirk; Shruti H Mehta Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-02-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Sharon M Kelly; Barry S Brown; Heather Schacht Reisinger; James A Peterson; Adrienne Ruhf; Michael H Agar; Kevin E O'Grady; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2009 Sep-Oct
Authors: Laura B Monico; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jan Gryczynski; Robert P Schwartz; Kevin E O'Grady; Yngvild K Olsen; Jerome H Jaffe Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2015-05-07
Authors: Raminta Daniulaityte; Ramzi W Nahhas; Sydney Silverstein; Silvia Martins; Angela Zaragoza; Avery Moeller; Robert G Carlson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Benjamin T Hayes; Andrea Jakubowski; Christine Fitzsimmons; Billy Garcia; Franklin Ramirez; Aaron D Fox Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.164