Literature DB >> 24016491

Rationale and design of the Clarification of Optimal Anticoagulation through Genetics trial.

Stephen E Kimmel1, Benjamin French, Jeffrey L Anderson, Brian F Gage, Julie A Johnson, Yves D Rosenberg, Nancy L Geller, Scott E Kasner, Charles S Eby, Jungnam Joo, Michael D Caldwell, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Robert G Hart, Denise Cifelli, Rosemary Madigan, Colleen M Brensinger, Suzanne Goldberg, Robert M Califf, Jonas H Ellenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current dosing practices for warfarin are empiric and result in the need for frequent dose changes as the international normalized ratio gets too high or too low. As a result, patients are put at increased risk for thromboembolism, bleeding, and premature discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Prior research has identified clinical and genetic factors that can alter warfarin dose requirements, but few randomized clinical trials have examined the utility of using clinical and genetic information to improve anticoagulation control or clinical outcomes among a large, diverse group of patients initiating warfarin.
METHODS: The COAG trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial comparing 2 approaches to guiding warfarin therapy initiation: initiation of warfarin therapy based on algorithms using clinical information plus an individual's genotype using genes known to influence warfarin response ("genotype-guided dosing") versus only clinical information ("clinical-guided dosing") (www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00839657).
RESULTS: The COAG trial design is described. The study hypothesis is that, among 1,022 enrolled patients, genotype-guided dosing relative to clinical-guided dosing during the initial dosing period will increase the percentage of time that patients spend in the therapeutic international normalized ratio range in the first 4 weeks of therapy.
CONCLUSION: The COAG will determine if genetic information provides added benefit above and beyond clinical information alone.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016491      PMCID: PMC4415273          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  31 in total

1.  Comparison of three methods to assess therapeutic quality control of treatment with vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  B A Hutten; M H Prins; W K Redekop; J G Tijssen; S H Heisterkamp; H R Büller
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Validation of pharmacogenomic biomarker classifiers for treatment selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 3.  Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment.

Authors:  M N Levine; G Raskob; S Landefeld; C Kearon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  A randomized and clinical effectiveness trial comparing two pharmacogenetic algorithms and standard care for individualizing warfarin dosing (CoumaGen-II).

Authors:  Jeffrey L Anderson; Benjamin D Horne; Scott M Stevens; Scott C Woller; Kent M Samuelson; Justin W Mansfield; Michelle Robinson; Stephanie Barton; Kim Brunisholz; Chrissa P Mower; John A Huntinghouse; Jeffrey S Rollo; Dustin Siler; Tami L Bair; Stacey Knight; Joseph B Muhlestein; John F Carlquist
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Different contributions of polymorphisms in VKORC1 and CYP2C9 to intra- and inter-population differences in maintenance dose of warfarin in Japanese, Caucasians and African-Americans.

Authors:  Harumi Takahashi; Grant R Wilkinson; Edith A Nutescu; Takashi Morita; Marylyn D Ritchie; Maria G Scordo; Vittorio Pengo; Martina Barban; Roberto Padrini; Ichiro Ieiri; Kenji Otsubo; Toshitaka Kashima; Sosuke Kimura; Shinichi Kijima; Hirotoshi Echizen
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  An analysis of the lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  E M Hylek; S J Skates; M A Sheehan; D E Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Audit of the frequency and clinical response to excessive oral anticoagulation in an out-patient population.

Authors:  M L Brigden; C Kay; A Le; C Graydon; B McLeod
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  No effect of encapsulation on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

Authors:  Susanne Johansson; Lis Ohlsson; Helene Stenhoff; Karin Wåhlander; Marie Cullberg
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 9.  Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention.

Authors:  C S Landefeld; R J Beyth
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Impact of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Initiation on Early Warfarin Dosing.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Le Wang; Benjamin French; Steven R Messe; Richard Horenstein; Emile R Mohler; James A S Muldowney; Jonas Ellenberg; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.571

2.  Characteristics associated with informed consent for genetic studies in the ACCORD trial.

Authors:  Denise G Simons-Morton; Jeffrey C Chan; Angela R Kimel; Peter E Linz; Cynthia L Stowe; John Summerson; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French; Scott E Kasner; Julie A Johnson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Yves D Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Rosemary A Madigan; Robert B McBane; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Scott M Stevens; Steven Yale; Emile R Mohler; Margaret C Fang; Vinay Shah; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; James A S Muldowney; Jaspal Gujral; Patrice Delafontaine; Robert J Desnick; Thomas L Ortel; Henny H Billett; Robert C Pendleton; Nancy L Geller; Jonathan L Halperin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael D Caldwell; Robert M Califf; Jonas H Ellenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Rationale and design of VENTURE-AF: a randomized, open-label, active-controlled multicenter study to evaluate the safety of rivaroxaban and vitamin K antagonists in subjects undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; Riccardo Cappato; Stefan H Hohnloser; Francis E Marchlinski; David J Wilber; Jim Xiang; Changsheng Ma; Susanne Hess; David Wyn Davies; Larry E Fields; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Warfarin Dosing Algorithms and the Need for Human Intervention.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Le Wang; Benjamin French; Steven R Messé; Jonas Ellenberg; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  A systematic analysis and comparison of warfarin initiation strategies.

Authors:  Benjamin French; Le Wang; Brian F Gage; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Pharmacogenomic knowledge gaps and educational resource needs among physicians in selected specialties.

Authors:  Katherine A Johansen Taber; Barry D Dickinson
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2014-07-10

Review 8.  Warfarin: The End or the End of One Size Fits All Therapy?

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.