Literature DB >> 22431865

A randomized and clinical effectiveness trial comparing two pharmacogenetic algorithms and standard care for individualizing warfarin dosing (CoumaGen-II).

Jeffrey L Anderson1, Benjamin D Horne, Scott M Stevens, Scott C Woller, Kent M Samuelson, Justin W Mansfield, Michelle Robinson, Stephanie Barton, Kim Brunisholz, Chrissa P Mower, John A Huntinghouse, Jeffrey S Rollo, Dustin Siler, Tami L Bair, Stacey Knight, Joseph B Muhlestein, John F Carlquist.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is characterized by marked variations in individual dose requirements and a narrow therapeutic window. Pharmacogenetics (PG) could improve dosing efficiency and safety, but clinical trials evidence is meager. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A Randomized and Clinical Effectiveness Trial Comparing Two Pharmacogenetic Algorithms and Standard Care for Individualizing Warfarin Dosing (CoumaGen-II) comprised 2 comparisons: (1) a blinded, randomized comparison of a modified 1-step (PG-1) with a 3-step algorithm (PG-2) (N=504), and (2) a clinical effectiveness comparison of PG guidance with use of either algorithm with standard dosing in a parallel control group (N=1866). A rapid method provided same-day CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotyping. Primary outcomes were percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 and 3 months and percentage of time in therapeutic range. Primary analysis was modified intention to treat. In the randomized comparison, PG-2 was noninferior but not superior to PG-1 for percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 month and 3 months and for percentage of time in therapeutic range at 3 months. However, the combined PG cohort was superior to the parallel controls (percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios 31% versus 42% at 1 month; 30% versus 42% at 3 months; percentage of time in therapeutic range 69% versus 58%, 71% versus 59%, respectively, all P<0.001). Differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and clinical indication. There were fewer percentage international normalized ratios ≥4 and ≤1.5 and serious adverse events at 3 months (4.5% versus 9.4% of patients, P<0.001) with PG guidance.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PG dosing should be considered for broader clinical application, a proposal that is being tested further in 3 major randomized trials. The simpler 1-step PG algorithm provided equivalent results and may be preferable for clinical application. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00927862.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431865     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  75 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetic testing: Current Evidence of Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Jivan Moaddeb; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 2.  Personalized medicine: is it a pharmacogenetic mirage?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Devron R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Ethnicity-specific pharmacogenetics: the case of warfarin in African Americans.

Authors:  W Hernandez; E R Gamazon; K Aquino-Michaels; S Patel; T J O'Brien; A F Harralson; R A Kittles; A Barbour; M Tuck; S D McIntosh; J N Douglas; D Nicolae; L H Cavallari; M A Perera
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 4.  Monitoring in clinical biochemistry.

Authors:  Jenny Doust; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics of warfarin: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ming Ta Michael Lee; Teri E Klein
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Evidence for Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics in Cardiac Drugs.

Authors:  Amy L Kaufman; Jared Spitz; Michael Jacobs; Matthew Sorrentino; Shennin Yuen; Keith Danahey; Donald Saner; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Pharmacogenetics of warfarin dosing in patients of African and European ancestry.

Authors:  Aditi Shendre; Chrisly Dillon; Nita A Limdi
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 8.  Novel genetic and epigenetic factors of importance for inter-individual differences in drug disposition, response and toxicity.

Authors:  Volker M Lauschke; Yitian Zhou; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Are Evidence Standards Different for Genomic- vs. Clinical-Based Precision Medicine? A Quantitative Analysis of Individualized Warfarin Therapy.

Authors:  D S Dhanda; G F Guzauskas; J J Carlson; A Basu; D L Veenstra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Genomics in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Robert Roberts; A J Marian; Sonny Dandona; Alexandre F R Stewart
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.