Literature DB >> 22849400

Working memory capacity and visual-verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: toward a unified view of attention.

Patrik Sörqvist1, Stefan Stenfelt, Jerker Rönnberg.   

Abstract

Two fundamental research questions have driven attention research in the past: One concerns whether selection of relevant information among competing, irrelevant, information takes place at an early or at a late processing stage; the other concerns whether the capacity of attention is limited by a central, domain-general pool of resources or by independent, modality-specific pools. In this article, we contribute to these debates by showing that the auditory-evoked brainstem response (an early stage of auditory processing) to task-irrelevant sound decreases as a function of central working memory load (manipulated with a visual-verbal version of the n-back task). Furthermore, individual differences in central/domain-general working memory capacity modulated the magnitude of the auditory-evoked brainstem response, but only in the high working memory load condition. The results support a unified view of attention whereby the capacity of a late/central mechanism (working memory) modulates early precortical sensory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22849400     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  46 in total

1.  Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Neural correlates of working memory's suppression of aversive olfactory distraction effects.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Stephen J Wilson; Zvi Shapiro; Hilary Galloway-Long; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Neural signature of inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Gautier Durantin; Frederic Dehais; Nicolas Gonthier; Cengiz Terzibas; Daniel E Callan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Clinical Correlation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kah Hui Yap; Hanani Abdul Manan; Noorazrul Yahya; Shahrul Azmin; Shahizon Azura Mohamed Mukari; Norlinah Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Effects of Steady-State Noise on Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Mary Alt; Gayle DeDe; Sarah Olson; James Shehorn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Early auditory evoked potential is modulated by selective attention and related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Christina M Karns; Helen J Neville; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: modeling spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield; Nicole M Amichetti; Amanda Lash
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

10.  Subjective ratings of masker disturbance during the perception of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana A Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.