Literature DB >> 24013578

Extraction of retinal tacks from subjects implanted with an epiretinal visual prosthesis.

Eugene de Juan1, Rand Spencer, Pierre-Olivier Barale, Lyndon da Cruz, Jordan Neysmith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retinal tacks, first developed for the treatment of complex retinal detachments, have more recently been used for the fixation of epiretinal electrode arrays as part of implanted visual prostheses. Here, we report on the clinical experience of extracting four such tacks after chronic implantation. The ability to safely extract retinal tacks ensures that epiretinal devices can be repositioned or removed if necessary.
METHODS: Custom-built, titanium alloy retinal tacks were mechanically removed from the posterior coats after prolonged implantation (up to 19 months). The resulting wound was characterized by clinical evaluation, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography while being monitored for stability over time. The wounds were also compared to earlier published reports of the healing response around retinal tacks in human subjects.
RESULTS: Tack extraction was accomplished successfully, without complication, in all four subjects. The wound site was readily identified by pale scar tissue. No change in the wound size or appearance was noted over many months of post-operative observation (up to 22 months after explant). No adverse effects on overall ocular health were detected.
CONCLUSION: Extraction of retinal tacks from subjects implanted with epiretinal prostheses can be performed without significant complication. The long-term healing response appears to be stable and localized in eyes afflicted with retinitis pigmentosa or choroideremia. There was also minimal, if any, impact on the local circulatory system. These cases suggest that the use of retinal tacks for anchoring epiretinal visual prostheses does not preclude safe repositioning or removal of the device more than a year after implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013578      PMCID: PMC3893278          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2452-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  16 in total

1.  Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead.

Authors:  J F Rizzo; J Wyatt; M Humayun; E de Juan; W Liu; A Chow; R Eckmiller; E Zrenner; T Yagi; G Abrams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Retinal replacement--the development of microelectronic retinal prostheses--experience with subretinal implants and new aspects.

Authors:  Helmut G Sachs; Veit-Peter Gabel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Richard Williamson; Jim Little; Brian Mech; Valerie Cimmarusti; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The use of tacks for the repair of complicated retinal detachment.

Authors:  G C Brown
Journal:  Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1987

5.  Mechanical retinal fixation using tacks.

Authors:  E de Juan; B W McCuen; R Machemer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Clinical results of titanium retinal tacks with pneumatic insertion.

Authors:  G W Abrams; G A Williams; J Neuwirth; H R McDonald
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Retinal tacks: tolerance and tissue reaction in a human eye.

Authors:  R C Tripathi; D M Pon; R A Levine; B J Tripathi; R C Falckh; K P Moffat
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1989-09

8.  A plastic tack for the treatment of retinal detachment with giant tear.

Authors:  F Ando; J Kondo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Intrusion of retinal tacks.

Authors:  H Lewis; T M Aaberg; K H Packo; P P Richmond; M S Blumenkranz; G W Blankenship
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Postoperative Morphologic Retinal Changes by Optical Coherence Tomography in Recipients of an Electronic Retinal Prosthesis Implant.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Laura Cinelli; Lucia Finocchio; Ruggero Tartaro; Francesca Santoro; Ninel Z Gregori
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  New retinal tack designs: an analysis of retention forces in human scleral tissue.

Authors:  Markus Schulze Schwering; Theo Oltrup; Kai Sinan Rückheim; Thomas Bende; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Martin Alexander Leitritz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Retinal Tacks for Complicated Retinal Detachment: Retinal Tacks in the Times of Modern Small-Gauge Vitrectomy.

Authors:  Luca Mautone; Simon Dulz; Christos Skevas; Maximilian Schultheiss; Martin Stephan Spitzer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  INTRAOPERATIVE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AND ENDOSCOPY-GUIDED EXPLANTATION OF ARGUS II DEVICE.

Authors:  Cindy X Cai; Lejla Vajzovic
Journal:  Retin Cases Brief Rep       Date:  2020-03-17

5.  Argus II retinal prosthesis malrotation and repositioning with intraoperative optical coherence tomography in a posterior staphyloma.

Authors:  Michael I Seider; Paul Hahn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.