OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a web-based tool designed to manage genetic information and facilitate communication of test results and variant updates from the laboratory to the clinics, we measured the use of GIC and the time it took for new genetic knowledge to be available to clinicians. METHODS: Usage data were collected across four study sites for the GIC launch and post-GIC implementation time periods. The primary outcome measures were the time (average number of days) between variant change approval and notification of clinic staff, and the time between notification and viewing the patient record. RESULTS: Post-GIC, time between a variant change approval and provider notification was shorter than at launch (average days at launch 503.8, compared to 4.1 days post-GIC). After e-mail alerts were sent at launch, providers clicked into the patient record associated with 91% of these alerts. In the post period, clinic providers clicked into the patient record associated with 95% of the alerts, on average 12 days after the e-mail was sent. DISCUSSION: We found that GIC greatly increased the likelihood that a provider would receive updated variant information as well as reduced the time associated with distributing that variant information, thus providing a more efficient process for incorporating new genetic knowledge into clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate that health information technology systems have the potential effectively to assist providers in utilizing genetic information in patient care.
OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of GeneInsight Clinic (GIC), a web-based tool designed to manage genetic information and facilitate communication of test results and variant updates from the laboratory to the clinics, we measured the use of GIC and the time it took for new genetic knowledge to be available to clinicians. METHODS: Usage data were collected across four study sites for the GIC launch and post-GIC implementation time periods. The primary outcome measures were the time (average number of days) between variant change approval and notification of clinic staff, and the time between notification and viewing the patient record. RESULTS: Post-GIC, time between a variant change approval and provider notification was shorter than at launch (average days at launch 503.8, compared to 4.1 days post-GIC). After e-mail alerts were sent at launch, providers clicked into the patient record associated with 91% of these alerts. In the post period, clinic providers clicked into the patient record associated with 95% of the alerts, on average 12 days after the e-mail was sent. DISCUSSION: We found that GIC greatly increased the likelihood that a provider would receive updated variant information as well as reduced the time associated with distributing that variant information, thus providing a more efficient process for incorporating new genetic knowledge into clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate that health information technology systems have the potential effectively to assist providers in utilizing genetic information in patient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Genetics; Laboratory Software; Medical Informatics Applications
Authors: Callum J Bell; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Shannon L Hateley; Elena E Ganusova; Joann Mudge; Ray J Langley; Lu Zhang; Clarence C Lee; Faye D Schilkey; Vrunda Sheth; Jimmy E Woodward; Heather E Peckham; Gary P Schroth; Ryan W Kim; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Li Weng; Nihan Kavaslar; Anna Ustaszewska; Heather Doelle; Wendy Schackwitz; Sybil Hébert; Jonathan C Cohen; Ruth McPherson; Len A Pennacchio Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Michael Arad; Barry J Maron; Joshua M Gorham; Walter H Johnson; J Philip Saul; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Paolo Spirito; Gregory B Wright; Ronald J Kanter; Christine E Seidman; J G Seidman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samuel J Aronson; Eugene H Clark; Lawrence J Babb; Samantha Baxter; Lisa M Farwell; Birgit H Funke; Amy Lovelette Hernandez; Victoria A Joshi; Elaine Lyon; Andrew R Parthum; Franklin J Russell; Matthew Varugheese; Thomas C Venman; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Hutton M Kearney; Erik C Thorland; Kerry K Brown; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Sarah T South Journal: Genet Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Yali Xue; Yuan Chen; Qasim Ayub; Ni Huang; Edward V Ball; Matthew Mort; Andrew D Phillips; Katy Shaw; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; Chris Tyler-Smith Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: C Sue Richards; Sherri Bale; Daniel B Bellissimo; Soma Das; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri R Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Brian E Ward Journal: Genet Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Stephanie Klinkenberg-Ramirez; Pamela M Neri; Lynn A Volk; Sara J Samaha; Lisa P Newmark; Stephanie Pollard; Matthew Varugheese; Samantha Baxter; Samuel J Aronson; Heidi L Rehm; David W Bates Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Arjun K Manrai; Birgit H Funke; Heidi L Rehm; Morten S Olesen; Bradley A Maron; Peter Szolovits; David M Margulies; Joseph Loscalzo; Isaac S Kohane Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James T Bennett; Valeria Vasta; Min Zhang; Jaya Narayanan; Peter Gerrits; Si Houn Hahn Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: David N Louis; Michael Feldman; Alexis B Carter; Anand S Dighe; John D Pfeifer; Lynn Bry; Jonas S Almeida; Joel Saltz; Jonathan Braun; John E Tomaszewski; John R Gilbertson; John H Sinard; Georg K Gerber; Stephen J Galli; Jeffrey A Golden; Michael J Becich Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: K D Christensen; J L Vassy; L Jamal; L S Lehmann; M J Slashinski; D L Perry; J O Robinson; J Blumenthal-Barby; L Z Feuerman; M F Murray; R C Green; A L McGuire Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: C L Overby; B Heale; S Aronson; J M Cherry; S Dwight; A Milosavljevic; T Nelson; A Niehaus; M A Weaver; E M Ramos; M S Williams Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Elizabeth Cutting; Meghan Banchero; Amber L Beitelshees; James J Cimino; Guilherme Del Fiol; Ayse P Gurses; Mark A Hoffman; Linda Jo Bone Jeng; Kensaku Kawamoto; Mark Kelemen; Harold Alan Pincus; Alan R Shuldiner; Marc S Williams; Toni I Pollin; Casey Lynnette Overby Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: James M Hoffman; Henry M Dunnenberger; J Kevin Hicks; Kelly E Caudle; Michelle Whirl Carrillo; Robert R Freimuth; Marc S Williams; Teri E Klein; Josh F Peterson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Ingrid A Holm; Pankaj B Agrawal; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Kurt D Christensen; Shawn Fayer; Leslie A Frankel; Casie A Genetti; Joel B Krier; Rebecca C LaMay; Harvey L Levy; Amy L McGuire; Richard B Parad; Peter J Park; Stacey Pereira; Heidi L Rehm; Talia S Schwartz; Susan E Waisbren; Timothy W Yu; Robert C Green; Alan H Beggs Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 2.125