Literature DB >> 24012428

Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors.

Marios G Lykissas1, Alexander Aichmair2, Alexander P Hughes2, Andrew A Sama2, Darren R Lebl2, Fadi Taher2, Jerry Y Du2, Frank P Cammisa2, Federico P Girardi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has become an increasingly common minimally invasive procedure for selective degenerative deformity correction, reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis, and indirect foraminal decompression. Concerns remain about the safety of the transpsoas approach to the spine due to proximity of the lumbosacral plexus.
PURPOSE: To address risk factors for iatrogenic nerve injury in a large cohort of patients undergoing LLIF. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 919 LLIF procedures to identify risk factors for lumbosacral plexus injuries.
METHODS: The medical charts of patients who underwent transpsoas interbody fusion with or without supplemental posterior fusion for degenerative spinal conditions over a 6-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior lumbar spine surgery or follow-up of less than 6 months were excluded. Factors that may affect the neurologic outcome were investigated in a subset of patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF.
RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-one patients (males/females: 179/272) met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 15 months (range, 6-53 months). Average age at the time of surgery was 63 years (range, 24-90 years). Average body mass index was 29 kg/m(2) (range, 17-65 kg/m(2)). A total of 919 levels were treated (mean, 2 levels per patient). Immediately after surgery, 38.5% of the patients reported anterior thigh/groin pain, whereas sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 38% and 23.9% of the patients, respectively. At the last follow-up, 4.8% of the patients reported anterior thigh/groin pain, whereas sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 24.1% and 17.3% of the patients, respectively. When patients with neural deficits present before surgery were excluded, persistent surgery-related sensory and motor deficits were identified in 9.3% and 3.2% of the patients, respectively. Among 87 patients with minimum follow-up of 18 months, persistent surgery-related sensory and motor deficits were recorded in 9.6% and 2.3% of the patients, respectively. Among patients with stand-alone LLIF, the level treated was identified as a risk factor for postoperative lumbosacral plexus injury. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 was associated with persistent motor deficits.
CONCLUSIONS: Although LLIF is associated with an increased prevalence of anterior thigh/groin pain as well as motor and sensory deficits immediately after surgery, our results support that pain and neurologic deficits decrease over time. The level treated appears to be a risk factor for lumbosacral plexus injury.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; LLIF; Nerve injury; Risk factors; Transpsoas approach

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24012428     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  33 in total

1.  The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer; Christoph Zandanell; Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Endoscope-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of cauda equina syndrome: a technical note.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Ji-Hoon Seong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Jennifer Shue; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Minimally invasive spine surgery for degenerative spine disease and deformity correction: a literature review.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Dionysios Giannoulis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique.

Authors:  Janina Kueper; Gary A Fantini; Brendon R Walker; Alexander Aichmair; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The incidence and risk factors for post-operative ileus after spinal fusion surgery: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Paul D Kiely; Lauren E Mount; Jerry Y Du; Joseph T Nguyen; Gil Weitzman; Stavros Memstoudis; Seth A Waldman; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Femoral nerve and lumbar plexus injury after minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: electrodiagnostic prognostic indicators and a roadmap to recovery.

Authors:  Naomi A Abel; Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.