Literature DB >> 24009083

Bayesian random threshold estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model.

Lili Zhao1, Dai Feng, Emily L Bellile, Jeremy M G Taylor.   

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a Bayesian approach to estimate a Cox proportional hazards model that allows a threshold in the regression coefficient, when some fraction of subjects are not susceptible to the event of interest. A data augmentation scheme with latent binary cure indicators is adopted to simplify the Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation. Given the binary cure indicators, the Cox cure model reduces to a standard Cox model and a logistic regression model. Furthermore, the threshold detection problem reverts to a threshold problem in a regular Cox model. The baseline cumulative hazard for the Cox model is formulated non-parametrically using counting processes with a gamma process prior. Simulation studies demonstrate that the method provides accurate point and interval estimates. Application to a data set of oropharynx cancer patients suggests a significant threshold in age at diagnosis such that the effect of gender on disease-specific survival changes after the threshold.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox model; Markov chain Monte Carlo; cure model; mixture model; threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24009083      PMCID: PMC4167617          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  A nonparametric mixture model for cure rate estimation.

Authors:  Y Peng; K B Dear
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model.

Authors:  J P Sy; J M Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The Cox proportional hazards model with change point: an epidemiologic application.

Authors:  K Y Liang; S G Self; X H Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimating Cure Rates From Survival Data: An Alternative to Two-Component Mixture Models.

Authors:  A D Tsodikov; J G Ibrahim; A Y Yakovlev
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Bayesian dynamic models for survival data with a cure fraction.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Ming-Hui Chen; Dipak K Dey; Dani Gamerman
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  A Cox-type regression model with change-points in the covariates.

Authors:  Uwe Jensen; Constanze Lütkebohmert
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Semi-parametric estimation in failure time mixture models.

Authors:  J M Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry.

Authors:  G M Clark; L G Dressler; M A Owens; G Pounds; T Oldaker; W L McGuire
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Change point-cure models with application to estimating the change-point effect of age of diagnosis among prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Megan Othus; Yi Li; Ram Tiwari
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.404

10.  Flow cytometry in primary breast cancer: improving the prognostic value of the fraction of cells in the S-phase by optimal categorisation of cut-off levels.

Authors:  H Sigurdsson; B Baldetorp; A Borg; M Dalberg; M Fernö; D Killander; H Olsson; J Ranstam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Bayesian mixture model for changepoint estimation using ordinal predictors.

Authors:  Emily Roberts; Lili Zhao
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 1.829

2.  A Comparison between Cure Model and Recursive Partitioning: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Iranian Female with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mozhgan Safe; Javad Faradmal; Hossein Mahjub
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 2.238

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.