Literature DB >> 24008178

Degradation in the dentin-composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges.

Y Li1, C Carrera, R Chen, J Li, P Lenton, J D Rudney, R S Jones, C Aparicio, A Fok.   

Abstract

Oral biofilms can degrade the components in dental resin-based composite restorations, thus compromising marginal integrity and leading to secondary caries. This study investigates the mechanical integrity of the dentin-composite interface challenged with multi-species oral biofilms. While most studies used single-species biofilms, the present study used a more realistic, diverse biofilm model produced directly from plaques collected from donors with a history of early childhood caries. Dentin-composite disks were made using bovine incisor roots filled with Z100(TM) or Filtek(TM) LS (3M ESPE). The disks were incubated for 72 h in paired CDC biofilm reactors, using a previously published protocol. One reactor was pulsed with sucrose, and the other was not. A sterile saliva-only control group was run with sucrose pulsing. The disks were fractured under diametral compression to evaluate their interfacial bond strength. The surface deformation of the disks was mapped using digital image correlation to ascertain the fracture origin. Fracture surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to assess demineralization and interfacial degradation. Dentin demineralization was greater under sucrose-pulsed biofilms, as the pH dropped <5.5 during pulsing, with LS and Z100 specimens suffering similar degrees of surface mineral loss. Biofilm growth with sucrose pulsing also caused preferential degradation of the composite-dentin interface, depending on the composite/adhesive system used. Specifically, Z100 specimens showed greater bond strength reduction and more frequent cohesive failure in the adhesive layer. This was attributed to the inferior dentin coverage by Z100 adhesive, which possibly led to a higher level of chemical and enzymatic degradation. The results suggested that factors other than dentin demineralization were also responsible for interfacial degradation. A clinically relevant in vitro biofilm model was therefore developed, which would effectively allow assessment of the degradation of the dentin-composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenge.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bond strength; Dental restoration; Interfacial Degradation; Multi-species biofilm; Resin composite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24008178      PMCID: PMC3840069          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  48 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.

Authors:  Fernanda Miori Pascon; Kamila Rosamilia Kantovitz; Angela Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira; Ana Flávia Sanches Borges; Tatiana Nunes Silva; Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani; Franklin Garcia-Godoy
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Evaluation of the effect of water-uptake on the impedance of dental resins.

Authors:  Bakul Wadgaonkar; Shuichi Ito; Nadia Svizero; David Elrod; Stephen Foulger; Robert Rodgers; Yoshiki Oshida; Kevin Kirkland; Jeremy Sword; Frederick Rueggeberg; Franklin Tay; David Pashley
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Bernardo; Henrique Luis; Michael D Martin; Brian G Leroux; Tessa Rue; Jorge Leitão; Timothy A DeRouen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 4.  Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review.

Authors:  Cecilia Goracci; Simone Grandini; Maurizio Bossù; Egidio Bertelli; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation.

Authors:  Masahiro Ono; Toru Nikaido; Masaomi Ikeda; Susumu Imai; Nobuhiro Hanada; Junji Tagami; Khairul Matin
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model.

Authors:  M S Cenci; T Pereira-Cenci; J A Cury; J M Ten Cate
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Microbiota of plaque microcosm biofilms: effect of three times daily sucrose pulses in different simulated oral environments.

Authors:  C H Sissons; S A Anderson; L Wong; M J Coleman; D C White
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations.

Authors:  Tryfon Beazoglou; Stephen Eklund; Dennis Heffley; Jonathan Meiers; L Jackson Brown; Howard Bailit
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Streptococcal antagonism in oral biofilms: Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii interference with Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Jens Kreth; Yongshu Zhang; Mark C Herzberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Surface response of fluorine polymer-incorporated resin composites to cariogenic biofilm adherence.

Authors:  Mariko Gyo; Toru Nikaido; Koichi Okada; Junichi Yamauchi; Junji Tagami; Khairul Matin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Models of Caries Formation around Dental Composite Restorations.

Authors:  J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Polymerization- and solvent-induced phase separation in hydrophilic-rich dentin adhesive mimic.

Authors:  Farhana Abedin; Qiang Ye; Holly J Good; Ranganathan Parthasarathy; Paulette Spencer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Threats to adhesive/dentin interfacial integrity and next generation bio-enabled multifunctional adhesives.

Authors:  Paulette Spencer; Qiang Ye; Linyong Song; Ranganathan Parthasarathy; Kyle Boone; Anil Misra; Candan Tamerler
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Yuping Li; Ruoquiong Chen; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok; Joel Rudney
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Compositional design and optimization of dentin adhesive with neutralization capability.

Authors:  Linyong Song; Qiang Ye; Xueping Ge; Paulette Spencer
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Interaction between the Oral Microbiome and Dental Composite Biomaterials: Where We Are and Where We Should Go.

Authors:  J Kreth; J Merritt; C S Pfeifer; S Khajotia; J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations.

Authors:  Anqi Zhang; Ruoqiong Chen; Wondwosen Aregawi; Yiting He; Shuting Wang; Conrado Aparicio; Joel Rudney; Hooi Pin Chew; Alex S Fok
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Behavior of failed bonded interfaces under in vitro cariogenic challenge.

Authors:  Anelise F Montagner; Niek J M Opdam; Jan L Ruben; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Maximiliano S Cenci; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Calibration of a lactic-acid model for simulating biofilm-induced degradation of the dentin-composite interface.

Authors:  Laikuan Zhu; Yuping Li; Carola A Carrera; Yung-Chung Chen; Mingyu Li; Alex Fok
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 10.  Biostable, antidegradative and antimicrobial restorative systems based on host-biomaterials and microbial interactions.

Authors:  Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.