UNLABELLED: The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT® composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. METHODS: Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT® composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). RESULTS: KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86±11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: -5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: -2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: -2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P<0.0001) and lower VMS (r = -0.70; P<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.
UNLABELLED: The King-Devick (KD) oculomotor test has recently been advocated for sideline diagnosis of concussion. Although visual processing and performance are often impaired in concussion patients, the utility of KD as a concussion diagnostic tool is not validated. PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic value of KD, by comparing KD with post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS) and ImPACT® composite scores. We hypothesized that KD would be correlated with visual motor speed/memory (VMS, VIS) and reaction time (RT), because all require cognitive visual processing. We also expected parallel changes in KD and PCSS across recovery. METHODS: Thirty-five concussed individuals (12-19 y; 18 females, 17 males) were evaluated with PCSS, ImPACT® composite and KD scores over four clinical visits (V). RESULTS: KD times improved with each visit (ΔV1-V2: 7.86±11.82; ΔV2-V3: 9.17 ± 11.07; ΔV3-V4: 5.30 ± 7.87 s) and paralleled improvements in PCSS (ΔV1-V2: 8.97 ± 20.27; ΔV2-V3: 8.69 ± 14.70; ΔV3-V4: 6.31 ± 7.71), RT (ΔV1-V2: 0.05 ± 0.21; ΔV2-V3: 0.09 ± 0.19; ΔV3-V4 0.03 ± 0.07) and VMS (ΔV1-V2: -5.27 ± 6.98; ΔV2-V3: -2.61 ± 6.48; ΔV3-V4: -2.35 ± 5.22). Longer KD times were associated with slower RT (r = 0.67; P<0.0001) and lower VMS (r = -0.70; P<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION:Cognitive visual performance testing using KD has utility in concussion evaluation. Validation would further establish KD as an effective ancillary tool in longitudinal concussion management and research.
Authors: Zoe Marinides; Kristin M Galetta; Connie N Andrews; James A Wilson; Daniel C Herman; Christopher D Robinson; Michael S Smith; Brett C Bentley; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer; James R Clugston Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2015-02
Authors: Katherine K Weise; Mark W Swanson; Kimberly Penix; Matthew Heath Hale; Drew Ferguson Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Priya S Dhawan; Danielle Leong; Lisa Tapsell; Amaal J Starling; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer; Trenton L Overall; Jennifer S Adler; Rashmi B Halker-Singh; Bert B Vargas; David Dodick Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2017-12