Literature DB >> 24007761

Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Frank Martetschläger1, Marilee P Horan, Ryan J Warth, Peter J Millett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the disrupted acromioclavicular (AC) joint has historically resulted in high complication rates. As a result, there has been a move toward anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation and reconstruction, owing to its numerous biomechanical advantages and perceived clinical advantages.
PURPOSE: To report and analyze the unique complications associated with these anatomic CC ligament procedures using either cortical fixation buttons (CFBs) or tendon grafts (TGs) and to evaluate the effect that these complications have on patient outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: From January 2006 until May 2011, a total of 59 primary anatomic CC ligament procedures were performed using either CFBs or TGs. Demographic, surgical, subjective (including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH], Short Form-12 [SF-12], and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE] scores), and radiographic data along with surgical complications were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Construct survivorship, defined as the maintenance of reduction of the AC joint, was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method at 12- and 24-month intervals.
RESULTS: Surgical treatment for AC joint dislocations was performed in 3 women (4 shoulders) and 52 men (55 shoulders) with a mean age of 43.6 years (range, 18-71 years); 13 shoulders (22.0%) underwent fixation using the CFB technique, and 46 shoulders (78.0%) underwent reconstruction using the TG technique. The overall complication rate was 27.1% (16/59) in this study. There were 3 complications (23.1%) in the CFB group, including 1 coracoid fracture and 2 cases of hardware failure resulting in a loss of reduction. There were 13 complications (28.2%) in the TG group, including 4 graft ruptures, 2 clavicle fractures, 1 case of hardware failure, 1 hypertrophic distal clavicle, 2 cases of hardware pain, 1 suture granuloma, 1 case of adhesive capsulitis, and 1 case of axillary neuropathy. Twelve- and 24-month construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% and 83.2%, respectively. Of the 43 shoulders that did not have a complication, mean ASES scores significantly improved from 57.5 (range, 0-97) to 91 (range, 63-100) (P < .001), and mean SF-12 physical component summary scores significantly improved from 45 (range, 25-58) to 56 (range, 43-65.8) (P < .001) after a mean 2.4-year follow-up (range, 1.0-5.7 years). There were no significant differences in outcomes between those that did and did not experience a complication, with the exception that those with complications had significantly decreased median patient satisfaction compared with those without complications (3.5 vs 9, respectively; P = .049).
CONCLUSION: Anatomic procedures to treat disrupted CC ligaments using either CFBs or TGs resulted in an overall complication rate of 27.1% (16/59). Construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% at 12 months and 83.2% at 24 months. Good to excellent outcomes could only be reported in those patients who did not have a complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC joint; acromioclavicular joint; complications; coracoclavicular; outcomes; reconstruction; survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007761     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513502459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  60 in total

1.  Arthroscopically Assisted Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Technique Using Coracoclavicular Fixation and Soft-Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Ryan J Warth; Joshua A Greenspoon; Marilee P Horan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-10-21

2.  A Single-Tunnel Technique for Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael B Banffy; Carola F van Eck; Michael Stanton; Neal S ElAttrache
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Mario Fodale; Luigi Capasso; Gianpiero Cazzato; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-05-08

4.  Managing and recognizing complications after treatment of acromioclavicular joint repair or reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Patrick A Smith; Matthew J Smith; Seth L Sherman; David Flood; Xinning Li
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.

Authors:  Akshay Phadke; Nik Bakti; Rajesh Bawale; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 6.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Arthroscopically Assisted Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Nael Hawi
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-31

8.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Emre Çalışal; Levent Uğur
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

10.  Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Onur Kocadal; Korcan Yüksel; Melih Güven
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.