| Literature DB >> 24007517 |
Daniel P Fernandez1, Jason C Neff, Cho-Ying Huang, Gregory P Asner, Nichole N Barger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increases in the spatial extent and density of woody plants relative to herbaceous species have been observed across many ecosystems. These changes can have large effects on ecosystem carbon stocks and therefore are of interest for regional and national carbon inventories and for potential carbon sequestration or management activities. However, it is challenging to estimate the effect of woody plant encroachment on carbon because aboveground carbon stocks are very heterogeneous spatially and belowground carbon stocks exhibit complex and variable responses to changing plant cover. As a result, estimates of carbon stock changes with woody plant cover remain highly uncertain. In this study, we use a combination of plot- and remote sensing-based techniques to estimate the carbon impacts of piñon and juniper (PJ) encroachment in SE Utah across a variety of spatial scales with a specific focus on the role of spatial heterogeneity in carbon estimates.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24007517 PMCID: PMC3849329 DOI: 10.1186/1750-0680-8-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carbon Balance Manag ISSN: 1750-0680
Study area soil characteristics for each study plot
| HSC | 32 | 1.55 (0.02) | 0.13 (0.004) | 0.38 (.03) | 1.97 (0.69) | 7.47 (0.01) | 43.51 (O.09) | 49.01 (0.11) |
| LD | 34 | 1.38 (0.02) | 0.25 (0.03) | 1.53 (0.45) | 1.17 (0.04) | 8.23 (0.08) | 37.35 (0.10) | 54.41 (0.09) |
| HD | 41 | 1.29 (0.02) | 0.27 (0.04) | 2.13 (0.35) | 2.99 (0.84) | 9.71 (0.09) | 36.78 (0.11) | 53.01 (0.14) |
| PJD | 34 | 1.38 (0.02) | 0.22 (0.02) | 2.09 (0.46) | 0.96 (0.07) | 8.24 (0.07) | 37.35 (0.11) | 54.40 (0.17) |
All data are calculated means with ± standard errors in brackets. Means for soil texture are based on an N of 6 per plot. Bulk density and soil carbonate values are based on the 0-10 cm soil depth.
Figure 1Hop Creek study area aerial photos from 1937 and 2006. The 1937 photo shows our study plots. The boxed areas in each photo show a 25 ha area where our study plots were located and was the area used for the image segmentation ortho-photo analysis.
Regression equations and values used to calculate grass, black sagebrush, live PJ and dead PJ biomass and the percent carbon (C) within each plant type for determining kilograms of C
| Grass | Biomass = 0.566 * % cover m-2 | 0.96 | 40.84 (0.41) |
| Black sagebrush | Biomass = 12.132 * % cover m-2 | 0.90 | 45.55 (0.51) |
| Live Piñon | Biomass = 11.41 * (RCD * 0.1)^2.6664) | NA | 46.14 (0.43) |
| Juniper | Biomass = 8.256 * (RCD * 0.1)^2.8058) | NA | 45.64 (0.54) |
| Dead Piñon | Biomass = (Live Biomass - (1.853 *(RCD * 0.1)^2.0268)) | NA | 46.14 (0.43) |
Total number of trees per plot broken down by species, mean tree age, mean basal canopy area (BCA), tree trunk basal diameter (TCD), and percent grass, sage, duff/litter, and bareground cover per m
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | |
| HSC | 133 4 (J saplings) | NA | NA | NA | 11.85 (0.43) | 37.03 (0.95) | NA | 41.38 |
| LD | 1033 31 (30 P, 1 J) | 51 (3) | 4.2 (0.7) | 10.64 (1.04) | 11.97 (2.43) | 25.62 (2.57) | 27.60 (4.06) | 31.98 (4.04) |
| HD | 1400 42 (37 P, 5 J) | 53 (2) | 5.1(0.8) | 13.70 (1.32) | 2.71 (1.06) | 14.16 (1.88) | 53.84 (5.47) | 27.08 (4.42) |
| PJD | 100 30 (15 P, 3 J) | 47 (1) | 4.9 (2.5) | 8.54 (1.55) | 20.41 (2.32) | 25.83 (2.25) | 25.21(3.36) | 24.58 (3.22) |
For the HSC plot duff/litter and bare ground estimates are combined and presented in the bareground column. Percent cover estimates do not add up to 100 because forbs and shrubs other than black sagebrush are not included. Values in brackets are ± 1 standard error of the mean. P = Pinus edulis, J = Juniperus osteosperma.
Figure 22006 1-m resolution DOQQ of the of the Hop Creek area segmented into 300 mcells showing canopy area variance. The color ramp represents m2 canopy cover for grid cells lying within the 25 ha image segmented area.
Total and individual kg mC stocks for each plot
| Piñon and Juniper | 0.0003 (NA) | 1.13 (NA) | 3.24 (NA) | 1.10 (NA) |
| Black sagebrush | 0.41 (.01) | 0.31 (0.03) | 0.17 (0.02) | 0.31 (0.02) |
| Grass | 0.006 (.002) | 0.006 (0.001) | 0.001 (0.0006) | 0.011 (0.001) |
| Duff/Litter | 0.05 (0.01) c | 0.42 (0.11) b | 0.71 (0.13) a | 0.53 (0.14) a |
| Mineral Soil | 1.52 (0.06) ab | 1.68 (0.07) a | 1.37 (0.05) b | 1.44 (0.06) b |
| Total C | 1.99 | 3.55 | 5.49 | 3.39 |
Numbers in brackets are ± standard error values. For duff/litter and mineral soil values with the same letter are not significantly different. Piñon and Juniper C stocks are calculated with the allometric equations developed by Darling [40].
The spatial distribution of mineral and the duff/litter soil carbon (C) and encroached plot trees
| MI mineral soil C | −0.15 | −0.01 | −0.13 | −0.01 |
| Z-score MI mineral soil C | −0.88 | 0.09 | −0.86 | 0.38 |
| P-value MI mineral soil C | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Distribution mineral soil C | random | random | random | random |
| MI duff/litter C | −0.04 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Z-score MI duff/litter C | −0.05 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| P-value MI duff/litter C | NA | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Distribution duff/litter | random | clustered | clustered | clustered |
| ANND tree | NA | 0.61 | 079 | 0.59 |
| Z-score ANND tree | NA | 3.7 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| P-value ANND tree | NA | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Distribution tree | NA | clustered | clustered | clustered |
The spatial distribution of soil C pools is based Moran’s I (MI) for spatial autocorrelation. The spatial distribution is based on the Average Nearest Neighbor Distance (ANND) value.
Figure 3Modeled aboveground C change with tree encroachment.
Object-based image segmentation and ground based measurement comparisons for the LD and HD 300 mplots
| Image segmentation canopies | 32 | 42 |
| Ground measured canopies | 31 | 42 |
| Image segmentation canopy area plot-1 (m2) | 137.00 | 235.00 |
| Ground measured canopy area plot-1 (m2) | 130.05 | 213.57 |
| Image segmentation mean canopy area tree-1 (m2) | 4.15 (0.55) | 5.46 (0.59) |
| Ground measured mean canopy area (m2) | 4.19 (0.69) | 5.08 (0.83) |
| Image segmentation kg C plot-1 | 455.12 | 846.11 |
| Ground based measured kg C plot-1 using Huang et al. [ | 457.98 | 833.39 |
| Ground based measured kg C plot-1 using dbh | 327.26 | 937.49 |
Image segmentation tree C estimates per plot use the equation developed by Huang et al. [49]. Ground based tree C estimates are shown twice. Once using tree canopy area and the Huang et al. [49] equation and once using dbh and the appropriate tree species equation.
Figure 4Woody C increase area and magnitude from 1937 to 2006 in the Hop Creek region.