The o-palladated, chloro-bridged dimers [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 and [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 react with cyanuric acid in the presence of base to afford closed, chiral cage-molecules in which 12 organo-Pd(II) centers, located in pairs at the vertices of an octahedron, are linked by four tetrahedrally arranged cyanurato(3-) ligands. Incomplete (Pd10) cages, having structures derived from the corresponding Pd12 cages by replacing one pair of organopalladium centers with two protons, have also been isolated. Reaction of [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 with trithiocyanuric acid gives an entirely different and more open type of cage-complex, comprising only nine organopalladium centers and three thiocyanurato(3-) ligands: cage-closure in this latter system appears to be inhibited by steric crowding of the thiocarbonyl groups.
The o-palladated, chloro-bridged dimers [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 and [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 react with cyanuric acid in the presence of base to afford closed, chiral cage-molecules in which 12 organo-Pd(II) centers, located in pairs at the vertices of an octahedron, are linked by four tetrahedrally arranged cyanurato(3-) ligands. Incomplete (Pd10) cages, having structures derived from the corresponding Pd12cages by replacing one pair of organopalladiumcenters with two protons, have also been isolated. Reaction of [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 with trithiocyanuric acid gives an entirely different and more open type of cage-complex, comprising only nine organopalladiumcenters and three thiocyanurato(3-) ligands: cage-closure in this latter system appears to be inhibited by stericcrowding of the thiocarbonyl groups.
Recent decades have
seen the emergence of a rapidly expanding area
of coordination chemistry in which the electronic and geometriccharacteristics
of ligands and metalcenters are matched to afford large (sometimes
very large) multinuclear complexes with well-defined polyhedral geometries.[1] The work of Fujita,[2] Stang,[3] Raymond,[4] Ward,[5] and Schröder[6] has been particularly notable in this regard.
The assembly processes leading to polynuclear systems of this type
are often reversible under the conditions of synthesis, so that that
reactions can be self-correcting and can lead to cage-structures representing
true thermodynamic minima.[1]Here
we describe a new class of highly symmetrical, yet chiral,
cage-type complexes based on triply deprotonated cyanuric acid which
can, in the present context, be regarded as a tribasic imide. Monobasic
imides such as succinimide have long been known to react with o-metalated palladium(II) centers, in the presence of base,
to give binuclear complexes via N,O-coordination of the imidato(1−) ligand.[7] Extension of this type of chemistry to higher-nuclearity
cage-complexes (Pd6, Pd8) also proved possible,
with the di-imidesparabanic acid and pyromellitimide, respectively.[8,9] In such complexes, square-planar organopalladium(II) centers are
linked in nonbonded pairs through a (deprotonated) imide-nitrogen
atom and the oxygen of an adjacent carbonyl group.The simplest
possible tribasic imide is cyanuric
acid (Scheme 1), and preliminary computational
modeling studies suggested that the cyanurato(3−) ion could,
by reaction with square-planar transition metalcenters, give rise
to large, three-dimensional cage structures. Ligands derived from
cyanuric acid have previously been explored to a surprisingly limited
extent: for example, there appears to be no structurally characterized
transition metal derivative of the triply deprotonated, cyanurato(3−)
ligand.[10] Even the cyanurato(2−)
ligand is relatively rare in the literature, although it has been
structurally characterized as a binucleating ligand in the copper(I)complex [Cu2(C3N3O3H)(H2O)2],[11] and as a tetranucleating
ligand, linking pairs of molybdenumcenters, in [Mo4(N,N′-di-p-anisylformamidinate)6(C3N3O3H)].[12] The cyanurato(1−) ligand has been identified crystallographically
in a number of molecular complexes including [Cu(C3N3O3H2)2(NH3)2],[13] [Ni(C3N3O3H2)2(NH3)4],[14] and [Ag4(C3N3O3H2)4(4,4-bipyridyl)],[15] and also in the network structure [Ag2(C3N3O3H2)2(4,4-bipyridyl)]∞.[16] Molecular cyanurato(1−) complexes have a tendency to form
ribbon-like structures in the solid state, through hydrogen bonding
between the residual pairs of cyanurate [NHCO] units.[17]
Scheme 1
Formation of the Dodecapalladium and Decapalladium Cage-Complexes 1 and 2, Respectively, from Reaction of [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 with Cyanuric Acid
In the present work, molecular simulations suggested
that 12 [organopalladium(II)] centers could,
in principle, assemble with four
cyanurato(3−) ligands to give a neutral, closed-cage complex.
We now report the realization of two such dodecanuclear assemblies,
together with crystallographic and spectroscopic evidence for stable
intermediates (the homologous Pd10 complexes), and the
unexpected results of a parallel study using the trithiocyanurate(3−)
ligand.
Results and Discussion
Reaction of the o-palladated derivative of 2-phenylpyridine,
[Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2,[18] (6 equiv) with cyanuric acid (4 equiv), in the presence
of triethylamine as acid-acceptor (Scheme 1), afforded a deep orange crystalline complex (1). Mass
spectroscopy of complex 1 confirmed that a dodecanuclear
complex with 12 [2-phenylpyridine(-H)] ligands had been formed ([M
+ H]+: isotope distribution centered at m/z 3631). Analysis of 1 by 1HNMR spectroscopy showed that the complex contains only eight different
types of proton (Figure 1). These are assignable
to just a single [2-phenylpyridine(-H)] ligand (see Supporting Information), indicating that all 12 such ligands
in 1 must be present in geometrically equivalent environments.
Figure 1
1H NMR spectrum of the dodecanuclear complex 1 (400 MHz,
CD2Cl2). Resonances assignable to
six of the eight protons associated with each [2-phenylpyridine(-H)]
ligand are fully resolved, with the remaining two resonances overlapping
between 6.8 and 6.9 ppm.
1HNMR spectrum of the dodecanuclear complex 1 (400 MHz,
CD2Cl2). Resonances assignable to
six of the eight protons associated with each [2-phenylpyridine(-H)]
ligand are fully resolved, with the remaining two resonances overlapping
between 6.8 and 6.9 ppm.Single crystal X-ray diffraction revealed a molecular structure
(Figure 2a) in which the 12 organopalladium
vertices are indeed geometrically equivalent, being located in nonbonded
pairs about the vertices of an octahedron. The o-metalated
phenylpyridine ligands are arranged in π-stacked antiparallel
pairs, with the phenyl and pyridyl rings in near van der Waals contact
(interatomic distances in the range 3.3–3.7 Å).
Figure 2
Single crystal
X-ray structures of (a) the dodecanuclear complex 1 and
(b) the decanuclear complex 2. In 1, the
palladium atoms are grouped in six symmetrically equivalent
pairs about the vertices of an octahedron, and are bridged by cyanurato(3−)
ligands, [Pd—N—C=O—Pd], as shown in Scheme 1. Pairs of [2-phenylpyridine(-H)] ligands are stacked
antiparallel to one another. Complex 2 contains ten palladium
centers bridged by two cyanurato(3−) and two cyanurato(2−)
ligands, leaving an open face with two “unused” [HN—C=O]
residues.
Single crystal
X-ray structures of (a) the dodecanuclear complex 1 and
(b) the decanuclear complex 2. In 1, the
palladium atoms are grouped in six symmetrically equivalent
pairs about the vertices of an octahedron, and are bridged by cyanurato(3−)
ligands, [Pd—N—C=O—Pd], as shown in Scheme 1. Pairs of [2-phenylpyridine(-H)] ligands are stacked
antiparallel to one another. Complex 2 contains ten palladiumcenters bridged by two cyanurato(3−) and two cyanurato(2−)
ligands, leaving an open face with two “unused” [HN—C=O]
residues.Molecule 1 has (noncrystallographic)
point group symmetry T, and is therefore chiral.
In this context, chirality may
be defined by the rotational direction (clockwise or anticlockwise)
of the angular C=O—Pd linkages about the center of the
cyanurate(3−) ligand (Figure 3), viewed
from outside the molecular cage.
Figure 3
Helical chirality in complex 1, showing “clockwise”
and “anticlockwise” rotational enantiomers, viewed from
outside the cage.
Helical chirality in complex 1, showing “clockwise”
and “anticlockwise” rotational enantiomers, viewed from
outside the cage.In any one dodecamer
(Figure 2a), the rotational
direction is the same for all four such ligands,[19] but the crystal, having the centrosymmetric space group R3̅, contains equal numbers of “clockwise”
and “anticlockwise” enantiomers and is therefore racemic.
These enantiomers are stable in solution, as was demonstrated by use
of the chiral NMR shift reagent (S)-(+)-trifluoro-1-(9-anthryl)
ethanol.[20] The latter produced a well-defined
splitting of the triplet 1H resonance, originally at 6.04
ppm (Figure 1), to give two overlapping triplets
of equal intensity (see Supporting Information). This effect is consistent with the shift reagent forming a hydrogen
bond to the unused lone pair of a bridging (C=O—Pd)
oxygen atom. The pairwise arrangement of 12 metalcenters about the
vertices of an octahedron has previously been identified in metal–metal
bonded Mo(II) and Rh(II) complexes with the trianion of trimesoic
acid,[21] and in a related metal–organic
framework based on copper(II).[22] However,
the symmetrical coordination mode of trimesoate(3−) means that
chirality analogous to that of 1 does not arise in such
systems. Pairwise assemblies of 6 and 12 palladium(II) centers with
polypyrazolate ligands have previously been reported to give [Pd6]12+ and [Pd12]12+ cages,[22,23] though these are structurally unrelated to the present system.Examination of a batch of complex 1 crystallized from
dichloromethane/benzene revealed a small number of very thin, bright
yellow crystals, distinctly different from those of the orange Pd12complex. Single crystal X-ray analysis using synchrotron
radiation enabled this minor coproduct to be identified as the decapalladiumcomplex 2 (Figure 2b). Its structure
is derived from that of complex 1 by removing two organopalladium(II)
centers and replacing them with two protons, leaving a polyhedron
with a single open face, and there can be little doubt that 2 is the final precursor in the assembly of the closed-cage
molecule 1.Complexes entirely analogous to 1 and 2 were isolated from the reaction of cyanuric
acid with the dimericcomplex [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2.[25] The structure of the resulting
dodecanuclear complex, 3, was characterized both spectroscopically
and crystallographically (see Supporting Information), and that of the decanuclear complex (4), by NMR and
mass spectrometry. The N-methyl groups in 3 and 4 are very useful 1HNMR probes, with
the highly symmetrical Pd12complex 3 showing
only two N-methyl singlet resonances. One type of
methyl group (red in Figure 4) is strongly
shielded by the aromatic ring current of its neighboring [N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)] ligand, producing
a marked upfield shift for the resonance arising from this group of
protons. Both 3 and 4 show helical chirality,
as described above for 1 and 2, but addition
of the same hydrogen-bonding chiral shift reagent to the racemiccomplex 3 had no effect whatever on its 1HNMR spectrum.
In keeping with this, a space-filling representation of the X-ray
structure of 3 (Figure 5) shows
the framework of the complex to be completely screened from possible
hydrogen bonding interactions by the steric bulk of its 12 ortho-metalated N,N-dimethylbenzylamine
ligands. The central cavity of the dodecapalladiumcage is very small,
but computational modeling indicates that it could readily accommodate
an atom of helium, and that clathration of a neon atom should also
be feasible. Synthetic approaches to noble-gas molecular clathrates
of this type are currently under investigation.
Figure 4
Complex 3, showing the inequivalence of the two N-methyl
groups on each [N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)]
ligand. This inequivalence arises from
the “folded” geometry of the imide bridge,[7] which brings one methyl group (red), but not
the other (blue), into the ring-current shielding zone of the adjacent
aromatic ligand.
Figure 5
Ball-and-stick and space-filling
representations of 3, showing how the metal–ligand
framework of this Pd12 complex is screened from external
interactions by the 12 peripheral
[N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)] ligands.
Complex 3, showing the inequivalence of the two N-methyl
groups on each [N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)]
ligand. This inequivalence arises from
the “folded” geometry of the imide bridge,[7] which brings one methyl group (red), but not
the other (blue), into the ring-current shielding zone of the adjacent
aromatic ligand.Ball-and-stick and space-filling
representations of 3, showing how the metal–ligand
framework of this Pd12complex is screened from external
interactions by the 12 peripheral
[N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)] ligands.Contrasting with the 1HNMR spectrum
of 3, the homologous Pd10 complex, 4, shows 10
−CH3 signals and 10 doublet −CH2 resonances (two overlapping), arising from the five different environments
of the o-palladated ligand (Figure 6 and Supporting Information). Moreover,
the open face of complex 4, with its two projecting carbonyl
groups (cf., Figure 2b) offers clear possibilities
for hydrogen bonding with (S)-(+)-trifluoro-1-(9-anthryl)ethanol.
In practice, the latter reagent produced numerous splittings of the N-methyl and N-methylene resonances in
the 1HNMR spectrum of 4, including an especially
clear-cut splitting of two of the N-CH2 resonances (Figure 6), confirming that the
chirality of the open Pd10 cage is fully retained in solution.
Figure 6
(a) 700
MHz 1H NMR spectrum of the Pd12 complex 3 (aliphatic region) in CD2Cl2. (b)
Corresponding spectrum of the Pd10 complex 4. (c) Spectrum of 4 in the presence of the chiral shift
reagent (S)-(+)-trifluoro-1-(9-anthryl)ethanol.
(a) 700
MHz 1HNMR spectrum of the Pd12complex 3 (aliphatic region) in CD2Cl2. (b)
Corresponding spectrum of the Pd10 complex 4. (c) Spectrum of 4 in the presence of the chiral shift
reagent (S)-(+)-trifluoro-1-(9-anthryl)ethanol.The limited yields of cage-molecules,
and the presence of both
“closed” (Pd12) and “open”
(Pd10) cages in the final products, strongly suggest that
the assembly processes involved do not reach true thermodynamic minima.
Even though formation of a weak [C=O···Pd] coordinative
bond will undoubtedly be reversible under very mild conditions, it
seems unlikely that the same holds true for coordination of an anionic
imido-nitrogen to palladium(II), with displacement of chloride. Consequently,
achieving the (Pd12) global energy mininum may not always
be possible.Replacement of cyanuric acid with its trithio-analogue
in the reaction
with [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 was expected
to give a closed Pd12cage entirely analogous to that seen
in 1. The single product isolated from this reaction
did indeed contain organopalladium(II) centers and trithiocyanurato(3−)
ligands in the same 3:1 molar ratio as found in 1 and 3, but 1HNMR, mass spectroscopy, and single crystal
X-ray analysis showed that a completely different type of complex,
now containing nine organo-palladium(II) centers (5),
had been formed. The X-ray structure of 5 is shown in
Figure 7, from which it is evident that the
three trithiocyanurato(3−) anions link three pairs of organopalladiumcenters, each ligand forming two [Pd—N—C=S—Pd]
bridges. However, the coordination mode then changes so that the three
remaining [N—C=S] groups
(one on each trithiocyanurate ligand) act as chelating units, each
for a single organopalladiumcenter.[26]
Figure 7
Single crystal
X-ray structure of 5. Six of the nine
palladium atoms are grouped in pairs, with [Pd—N—C=S—Pd]
bridges analogous to the [Pd—N—C=O—Pd]
motif found in complex 1. The three remaining metal centers,
shown at the top of the structure, are each chelated by a single [N—C=S]
group.
Single crystal
X-ray structure of 5. Six of the nine
palladium atoms are grouped in pairs, with [Pd—N—C=S—Pd]
bridges analogous to the [Pd—N—C=O—Pd]
motif found in complex 1. The three remaining metalcenters,
shown at the top of the structure, are each chelated by a single [N—C=S]
group.Formation of the expected
thiocyanurate-Pd12cage appears
to be inhibited by the substantially greater van der Waals radius
of sulfur (1.80 Å) relative to oxygen (1.52 Å). In the structure
of complex 5, the “bridging” coordination
mode of the trithiocyanurate ligand brings three sulfur atoms into
van der Waals contact (S···S = 3.57, 3.53, and 3.52
Å), while in complex 1 the corresponding (O···O)
distances are in a similar range but for much smaller atoms. Computational
modeling (Cerius2 Universal Force Field) and energy-minimization
of the hypothetical Pd12-trithiocyanuratecomplex shows
that cage-closure would force the sulfur atoms well into sub-van-der-Waals
contact. The energy of the hypothetical Pd12(trithiocyanurate)4complex is in fact calculated to be some 380 kcal mol–1 higher than that of the Pd12(cyanurate)4complex, 1. While energies based on molecular
mechanics calculations cannot be quantitative for such complex molecules,
this result is certainly consistent with the severe stericcrowding
of sulfur atoms (S···S < 3.30 Å) seen in the
modeled Pd12-trithiocyanuratecomplex.Intriguingly,
the electrospray mass spectra of the Pd10 cage-molecules 2 and 4 both show subsidary
series of ions with half-integral mass numbers, corresponding to doubly
charged dimers in the form of disodium adducts (see Supporting Information). This ability of metal ions to link
pairs of Pd10 (but not Pd12) cages highlights
the fact that the relationship between a closed Pd12 and
an open Pd10 cage is somewhat analogous to that between
a closo- and a nido-carbaborane.[27] It is thus possible that the decanuclear complexes 2 and 4 could be doubly deprotonated to give
reactive “nido-like” dianions, with
the ability to act as ligands for bonded metalcenters such as [Rh—Rh]4+ or [Mo≡Mo]4+ (or indeed for nonbonded
pairs such as [Pd2+]2 or [Pt2+]2) that are already known to form stable binuclear complexes
with imidato-type ligands).[7−9,12,28] The commo-type systems
that are predicted to be formed in such reactions (see Supporting Information) would seem to have no
precedent in transition metalcoordination chemistry, and are currently
being sought in our laboratory.
Experimental
Section
Instrumentation and Analysis
Single crystal X-ray data
for 1 and 3 were collected using an Agilent
Technologies Gemini Ultra-S CCD instrument with Cu Kα radiation
for 1 and Mo Kα radiation for 3. Data
for 2 were obtained on beamline 11.3.1 of the Advanced
Light Source, Berkeley, CA, and data for 5 on beamline
I19 of the Diamond Light Source, Harwell, U.K. Full details of data
collection, structure solution and refinement for 1, 2, 3, and 5 are given as Supporting Information and in the deposited .cif
files CCDC 929579, 929577, 929578, and 929576, respectively. These
data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre at: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Proton
and carbonNMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Nanobay 400 operating
at 400 and 100 MHz for 1H and 13C nuclei, respectively,
or on a Bruker Avance III 700 operating at 700 and 175 MHz for 1H and 13C nuclei, respectively. Chemical shifts
are reported relative to the residual protic solvent signal in the
specified deuterated solvent. The numbers of protons in each environment
are reported as relative values. High resolution mass spectra (electrospray
ionization, ESI) were acquired on a Bruker micrOTOF-Q instrument,
working in positive ion mode.
Starting Materials and
Intermediates
Palladium(II)
chloride (anhydrous), 2-phenylpyridine, N,N-dimethylbenzylamine, cyanuric acid, and trithiocyanuric
acid were obtained from Aldrich and used as received. The ortho-palladated dimers [Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 and [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 were synthesized as described in the literature.[29,30]
[Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}]12[C3N3O3]4 (1)
[Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 (0.21 g, 0.36 mmol) and cyanuric acid (0.032 g, 0.25 mmol)
were dissolved in N,N-dimethylacetamide
(10 mL), triethylamine (0.2 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred
under N2 at 85 °C for seven hours. The cloudy solution
was filtered through Celite and washed through with dichloromethane,
and the combined filtrate and washings were then concentrated to ca. 3 mL under reduced pressure. Methanol (20 mL) was added,
and the solution was held at 4 °C overnight. The resulting orange
precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with methanol (20
mL), and dried under vacuum. The product, 1, was isolated
by column chromatography on silica (CH2Cl2/MeOH
100:5 v/v) as a bright orange, crystalline solid (0.067 g, 29%) (Rf = 0.3). 1HNMR (CD2Cl2 400 MHz): δ = 8.02 (dd, 1H, 5.6 and 1.0 Hz), 7.35 (d,
1H, 7.6 Hz), 7.21 (dt, 1H, 7.6 and 1.4 Hz), 7.09–7.04 (m, 1H),
6.96 (d, 1H, 7.6 Hz), 6.87–6.82 (m, 2H), 6.06–6.02 (m,
1H). 13CNMR (CD2Cl2 175 MHz): δ
= 169.6, 163.7, 154.7, 150.3, 145.4, 136.5, 134.8, 128.0, 122.7, 122.5,
120.3, 116.6. MS (ESI, positive ion mode) Calcd for C145H96N24O12Pd12 ([M + H]+) = 3623.6058. Found = 3623.5902. Anal. Calcd for C144H96N24O12Pd12·2CH2Cl2: C 46.13, H 2.65, N 8.84. Found: C 45.87, H
2.70, N 9.10%.
[Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}]12[C3N3O3]4 (3) and [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}]10[C3N3O3]2 [C3N3O3H]2 (4)
Cyanuric
acid (0.032 g, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved with stirring
in a mixture of dichloromethane (15 mL) and methanol (15 mL) at 35
°C, and then triethylamine (0.2 mL) and [Pd{N,N-dimethylbenzylamine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 (0.200 g, 0.36 mmol) were added. After stirring for 72 h at 35 °C,
the yellow solution was cooled and concentrated to ca. 10 mL at which point a fine yellow precipitate began to form. The
resulting suspension was held at 4 °C overnight and the solid
(A) collected by filtration. The filtrate was retained and further
concentrated to give a further quantity of yellow solid (B). Column
chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 100:2.5 v/v) of
fraction A resulted in isolation of the Pd12complex 3 (0.105 g, 52%, Rf = 0.9), whereas
column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 100:2.5 v/v)
of fraction B gave only the Pd10 species, 4, which was finally recrystallized from N,N-dimethylacetamide and methanol (0.018 g, 8%, Rf = 0.3). Complex 3 (Pd12) data
follow. 1HNMR (CD2Cl2 700 MHz):
δ = 6.92–6.89 (m, 1H), 6.79–6.76 (m, 3H), 4.11
(d, 1H, 14 Hz), 3.36 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 2.91 (s, 3H), 2.08 (s, 3H). 13C (CD2Cl2 175 MHz): δ = 168.6,
147.0, 146.9, 135.3, 124.1, 121.9, 120.0, 72.8, 51.7, 51.0. MS (ESI,
positive ion mode) Calcd for C120H145N24O12Pd12 ([M + H]+) = 3384.0010.
Found = 3383.9961. Anal. Calcd for C120H144N24O12Pd12: C 42.50, H 4.28, N 9.91. Found:
C 42.25, H 4.21, N 9.91%. Data for complex 4 (Pd10) follow. 1HNMR (CD2Cl2 700 MHz): δ = 8.91 (s, 1H), 6.94–6.64 (m, 20 H), 4.15
(d, 1H, 14 Hz), 4.13 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 4.04 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 4.03 (d,
1H, 14 Hz), 3.95 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 3.73 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 3.51 (d, 1H,
14 Hz), 3.47 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 3.44 (d, 1H, 14 Hz), 3.40 (d, 1H, 14
Hz), 3.03 (s, 3H), 3.02 (s, 3H), 2.94 (s, 3H), 2.91 (s, 3H), 2.90
(s, 3H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 2.02
(s, 3H). 13CNMR (CDCl3 175 MHz): δ =
168.94, 168.92, 168.90, 168.1, 161.7, 157.9, 147.9, 147.38, 147.35,
147.2, 147.1, 146.2, 145.3, 145.11, 145.07, 144.4, 135.1, 134.94,
134.89, 134.1, 124.67, 124.62, 124.41, 124.27, 124.14, 123.18, 123.04,
123.03, 122.79, 122.49, 121.07, 120.99, 120.83, 120.60, 72.98, 72.85,
72.83, 72.63, 51.85, 51.71, 51.69, 51.47, 51.44, 51.38. MS (ESI positive
ion mode) Calcd for C102H123N22O12Pd10 = 2913.0035. Found = 2913.0037. Anal. Calcd
for C102H122N22O12Pd12·MeCONMe2: C 39.83, H 4.13, N 10.08. Found:
C 40.10, H 3.92, N 9.94%.
[Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}]9[C3N3S3]3 (5)
[Pd{2-phenylpyridine(-H)}-μ-Cl]2 (0.118 g, 0.200
mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (6
mL) to give a bright yellow solution. Trithiocyanuric acid (0.024
g, 0.134 mmol) was added and washed in with dichloromethane (9 mL).
Triethylamine (1.5 mL) was added to give a dark orange-brown solution
which was stirred for 6 days. The resulting suspension was filtered
and the filtrate then concentrated to small volume on a rotary evaporator
and refrigerated for 48 h. The solid was filtered off, washed with
methanol, and dried under vacuum for 3 h to give the product, 5, as a dark red powder. Yield = 0.0639 g, 67%). An analytical
sample was obtained by low-temperature recrystallization from dichloromethane. 1HNMR (CD2Cl2 700 MHz): δ = 10.37
(d, 1H), 7.94 (d, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H), 7.68 (t, 1H), 7.45 (t, 1H), 7.40
(t, 1H), 7.38 (t, 1H), 7.26 (m, 3H), 7.15 (d, 1H), 7.14 (d, 1H), 7.10
(m, 2H), 6.97 (m, 2H), 6.89 (m, 3H), 6.72 (t, 1H), 6.67 (t, 1H), 6.57
(t, 1H), 6.31 (t, 1H), 6.14 (t, 1H). 13CNMR (CD2Cl2 700 MHz): δ = 117.9, 118.9, 119.2, 121.6, 122.0,
122.9, 123.1, 123.3, 123.4, 124.1, 128.4, 128.5, 128.7, 135.1, 135.8,
136.5, 137.8, 138.0, 138.4, 146.8, 147.4, 154.2. MS (ESI positive
ion mode) Calcd for C108H73N18S9Pd9 = 2962.5064. Found = 2962.5060.
Crystal Data:
Crystal data for 1 follow.
C144H96N24O12Pd12·3(CH2Cl2), Mr = 3886.10,
trigonal, R3̅, a = 18.1579(4)
Å, c = 76.3832(17) Å, V = 21 810.1(8) Å3, T = 150(2)
K, Z = 6, Dc = 1.775
g cm–3, μ(Cu Kα) = 13.230 mm–1, F(000) = 11 412, independent measured reflections
7782, R1 = 0.0406, wR2 = 0.0749 for 6315 independent observed reflections (Rint = 0.062) [2θ ≤ 62.820°, I > 2σ(I)]. CCDC 929579. Crystal
data for 2 follow. C122H82N22O12Pd10·5(C6H6), Mr = 3502.70, monoclinic, C2/c, a = 26.620(6) Å, b = 37.337(9) Å, c = 16.594(4) Å, β
= 113.678(3)°, V = 15 105(6) Å3, T = 100(2) K, Z = 4, Dc = 1.540 g cm–3, μ(synchrotron)
= 1.225 mm–1, F(000) = 6936, independent
measured reflections 14 313, R1 = 0.0643, wR2 = 0.1318 for 6315 independent
observed reflections (Rint = 0.060) [2θ
≤ 28.196°, I > 2σ(I)]. CCDC 929577. Crystal data for 3 follow. 2(C120H144N24O12 Pd12)·CHCl3, Mr = 6902.61, cubic, Pa3̅, a = 29.4972(2) Å, V = 25 665.0(3) Å3, T = 150(2) K, Z = 4, Dc = 1.786 g cm–3, μ(Mo Kα) = 1.735 mm–1, F(000) = 13 672, independent
measured reflections 14 765, R1 = 0.0842, wR2 = 0.2017 for 11 138
independent
observed reflections (Rint = 0.106) [2θ
≤ 30.114°, I > 2σ(I)]. CCDC
929578.
Crystal data for 5 follow. C108H72N18Pd9S9, Mr =
2868.08, monoclinic, P21/c, a = 23.4882(9) Å, b = 16.5223(8)
Å, c = 31.0850(12) Å, β = 101.680(3)°, V = 11 813.7(9) Å3, T = 100(2) K, Z = 4, Dc = 1.612 g cm–3, μ(synchrotron) = 1.546 mm–1, F(000) = 5616, independent measured
reflections 57 495, R1 = 0.1117,
wR2 = 0.1314 for 18 978 independent
observed reflections (Rint = 0.134) [2θ
≤ 28°, I > 2σ(I)]. CCDC 929576.
Authors: Anna V Davis; Dorothea Fiedler; Marco Ziegler; Andreas Terpin; Kenneth N Raymond Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-11-17 Impact factor: 15.419