Literature DB >> 24007141

Measurements of lateral penumbra for uniform scanning proton beams under various beam delivery conditions and comparison to the XiO treatment planning system.

Suresh Rana1, Omar Zeidan, Eric Ramirez, Michael Rains, Junfang Gao, Yuanshui Zheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main purposes of this study were to (1) investigate the dependency of lateral penumbra (80%-20% distance) of uniform scanning proton beams on various factors such as air gap, proton range, modulation width, compensator thickness, and depth, and (2) compare the lateral penumbra calculated by a treatment planning system (TPS) with measurements.
METHODS: First, lateral penumbra was measured using solid-water phantom and radiographic films for (a) air gap, ranged from 0 to 35 cm, (b) proton range, ranged from 8 to 30 cm, (c) modulation, ranged from 2 to 10 cm, (d) compensator thickness, ranged from 0 to 20 cm, and (e) depth, ranged from 7 to 15 cm. Second, dose calculations were computed in a virtual water phantom using the XiO TPS with pencil beam algorithm for identical beam conditions and geometrical configurations that were used for the measurements. The calculated lateral penumbra was then compared with the measured one for both the horizontal and vertical scanning magnets of our uniform scanning proton beam delivery system.
RESULTS: The results in the current study showed that the lateral penumbra of horizontal scanning magnet was larger (up to 1.4 mm for measurement and up to 1.0 mm for TPS) compared to that of vertical scanning magnet. Both the TPS and measurements showed an almost linear increase in lateral penumbra with increasing air gap as it produced the greatest effect on lateral penumbra. Lateral penumbra was dependent on the depth and proton range. Specifically, the width of lateral penumbra was found to be always lower at shallower depth than at deeper depth within the spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) region. The lateral penumbra results were less sensitive to the variation in the thickness of compensator, whereas lateral penumbra was independent of modulation. Overall, the comparison between the results of TPS with that of measurements indicates a good agreement for lateral penumbra, with TPS predicting higher values compared to measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Lateral penumbra of uniform scanning proton beams depends on air gap, proton range, compensator thickness, and depth, whereas lateral penumbra is not dependent on modulation. The XiO TPS typically overpredicted lateral penumbra compared to measurements, within 1 mm for most cases, but the difference could be up to 2.5 mm at a deep depth and large air gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007141     DOI: 10.1118/1.4818283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Dosimetric Comparison of Various Spot Placement Techniques in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning.

Authors:  Mahboob Ur Rehman; Omar A Zeidan; Twyla Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks; Patrick Kelly; Kevin Erhart
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  A comparison of the dose distributions from three proton treatment planning systems in the planning of meningioma patients with single-field uniform dose pencil beam scanning.

Authors:  Paul J Doolan; Jailan Alshaikhi; Ivan Rosenberg; Chris G Ainsley; Adam Gibson; Derek D'Souza; El Hassane Bentefour; Gary Royle
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  New School Technology Meets Old School Technique: Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy and Laparoscopic Pelvic Sling Facilitate Safe and Efficacious Treatment of Pelvic Sarcoma.

Authors:  Hunter C Gits; Eric J Dozois; Matthew T Houdek; Thanh P Ho; Scott H Okuno; Rachael M Guenzel; Laura A McGrath; Alan J Kraling; Jedediah E Johnson; Scott C Lester
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  A fast Monte Carlo code for proton transport in radiation therapy based on MCNPX.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07

6.  Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Hardev S Grewal; Michael S Chacko; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Determination of machine-specific tolerances using statistical process control analysis of long-term uniform scanning proton machine QA results.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Colton Eckert; Hardev Singh; Yuanshui Zheng; Michael Chacko; Mark Storey; John Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Proton vs Hyperarc™ radiosurgery: A planning comparison.

Authors:  A Boczkowski; P Kelly; S L Meeks; K Erhart; F J Bova; T R Willoughby
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.