Literature DB >> 24006861

Evaluation of eye drop administration technique in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Gail F Schwartz1, David A Hollander, Julia M Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate eye drop administration by patients at multiple visits in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with topical ocular hypotensive medication in a multicenter, investigator-masked trial. At baseline, patients were given a questionnaire for self-assessment of difficulty with drop administration. At baseline and 12 weeks, patients demonstrated drop instillation using a bottle of artificial tears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient self-assessment of difficulty with drop administration and observed patient difficulty with drop administration, defined as bottle touching eye/adnexa, drop missing the ocular surface, or administering more than 1 drop.
RESULTS: Of 164 enrolled patients, 50% had previously been treated with ocular hypotensive medication for ≥3 years. Only 11.4% of patients reported difficulty with eye drop administration at study entry. At baseline, 18.2% of patients touched their eye/adnexa with the bottle and 10.3% missed the eye. At 12 weeks, 18.5% and 8.6% of patients, respectively, had similar difficulties. Overall, difficulty with drop instillation was observed in 42.1% of patients. Difficulty at both visits was seen in 35.3% of patients who reported difficulty at entry and in 17.2% of patients who denied difficulty. The relative risk of demonstrating difficulty at either visit was 2.0 times greater for patients who self-reported difficulty at study entry (P = 0.004). The relative risk of demonstrating difficulty at week 12 was 3.8 times greater for patients with observed difficulty at baseline (P < 0.001). Limitations of the study design included self-administration of drops to the eye of the patient's choice and observation in an office setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with experience instilling topical glaucoma medications continue to have difficulties with eye drop administration, including patients who do not self-report difficulty. The risk of difficulty with eye drop administration is increased in patients who self-report difficulty and in patients who have been previously observed to have difficulty. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT01253902.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24006861     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.833898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of eye drop instillation techniques among patients with primary open angle glaucoma in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Olapeju A Sam-Oyerinde; Onyinyechukwu M Onyekwelu; Kareem O Musa; Olufisayo T Aribaba; Ibukunoluwa T Ayo; Sefinat A Agboola; Oluwatobi O Idowu; Adetunji N Adenekan; Folasade B Akinsola
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Exploring the influence of patient-provider communication on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Gail E Tudor; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Betsy L Sleath
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-06

3.  How glaucoma patient characteristics, self-efficacy and patient-provider communication are associated with eye drop technique.

Authors:  Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Alan L Robin; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Michelle Vitko; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Betsy Sleath
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2015-08-25

4.  The Effect of Eye Drop Technique Education in Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Jason A Goldsmith; Gail E Tudor; Alan L Robin; Betsy L Sleath
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  An upright eyedrop bottle: accuracy, usage of excess drops, and contamination compared to a conventional bottle.

Authors:  Isaiah J Davies; Ninita H Brown; Joanne C Wen; Sandra S Stinnett; Kelsey Kubelick; Roma P Patel; Kristin L Benokraitis; Latoya Greene; Curry Cheek; Kelly W Muir
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Eye drop administration in patients attending and not attending a glaucoma education center.

Authors:  Aisha Al-Busaidi; Debbie Anne Samek; Oscar Kasner
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

7.  Bottle Characteristics of Topical International Glaucoma Medications versus Local Brands in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nasser Al-Jumaian; Rizwan Malik; Rajiv Khandekar; Abdullah Al-Humaidan; Rana Al-Madany; Reham Al-Qahtani; Ahmed Altowairqi; Abdulwahab Al-Theeb; Babar Zaman; Leyla Al-Djasim; E Randy Craven; Deepak P Edward
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

8.  Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China.

Authors:  Xinghuai Sun; Mingkai Lin; Xuanchu Duan; Chun Zhang; Jian Ming
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Impact of the Support, Educate, Empower Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program Pilot Study on Eye Drop Instillation Technique and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Kevin J Schneider; Cecilia N Hollenhorst; Autumn N Valicevic; Leslie M Niziol; Michele Heisler; David C Musch; Stephen M Cain; Paula-Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-08-08

10.  Liposomal drug delivery system for anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract surgery: a phase I/II clinical trial.

Authors:  Chee Wai Wong; Edmund Wong; Josbert M Metselaar; Gert Storm; Tina T Wong
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.