| Literature DB >> 24006858 |
Stephen A Hart1, Ganesh P Devendra, Yuli Y Kim, Scott D Flamm, Vidyasagar Kalahasti, Janine Arruda, Esteban Walker, Thananya Boonyasirinant, Michael Bolen, Randolph Setser, Richard A Krasuski.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair and pulmonary valvotomy for pulmonary stenosis (PS) lead to progressive pulmonary insufficiency (PI), right ventricular enlargement and dysfunction. This study assessed whether pulmonary regurgitant fraction measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) could be reduced with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24006858 PMCID: PMC3844630 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-75
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Figure 1Patient flow diagram. Twenty four potential subjects were contacted and 18 completed the imaging protocol. One of these patients had motion artifact and another had significantly distorted anatomy preventing adequate measurements.
Demographics and clinical characteristics
| | n=16 |
| Demographics: | |
| Females | 8 (50) |
| Age (years) | 33.6 ± 8.8 |
| Age at complete repair (years) | 5.7 ± 6.8 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.8 ± 5.4 |
| Clinical Features: | |
| Repaired tetralogy of Fallot | 11 (69) |
| Repaired pulmonary stenosis | 5 (31) |
| Symptoms* | 11 (69) |
| NYHA Class ≥ II | 4 (25) |
| Echocardiography: | |
| Pulmonary insufficiency ≥ moderate | 13 (87) |
| Tricuspid regurgitation ≤ mild | 15 (93) |
| Right ventricular systolic pressure (mmHg) | 35.8 ± 13.6 |
| Electrocardiography | |
| QRS duration (ms) | 139.5 ± 28.2 |
*Includes shortness of breath, dyspnea on exertion or palpitations.
NYHA Class: New York Heart Association Functional Class.
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
Volumetric measurements
| Right Ventricle (n=16) | | | | |
| End diastolic volume index (mL/m2) | 156.9 ± 32.7 | 156.7 ± 31.0 | 0.1 ± 7.1 | 0.95 |
| End systolic volume index (mL/m2) | 93.0 ± 19.6 | 90.6 ± 20.5 | −2.3 ± 10.9 | 0.39 |
| Stroke volume index (mL/m2) | 63.9 ± 17.8 | 66.1 ± 17.8 | 4.2 ± 11.0 | 0.21 |
| Ejection fraction % | 40.5 ± 6.2 | 42.1 ± 6.8 | 4.4 ± 10.7 | 0.12 |
| Left Ventricle (n=16) | | | | |
| End diastolic volume index (mL/m2) | 83.0 ± 13.6 | 84.6 ± 13.2 | 2.2 ± 5.7 | 0.15 |
| End systolic volume index (mL/m2) | 38.5 ± 8.7 | 39.5 ± 8.4 | 3.1 ± 5.8 | 0.11 |
| Stroke volume index (mL/m2) | 44.5 ± 7.7 | 45.1 ± 8.1 | 1.7 ± 11.5 | 0.65 |
| Ejection fraction % | 53.8 ± 5.2 | 53.3 ± 5.8 | −1.0 ± 0.7 | 0.63 |
*By paired t-test between baseline values and iNO values.
Flow measurements
| Pulmonary Artery (n=16) | | | | |
| Average velocity (m/s) | 15.3 ± 8.1 | 15.9 ± 8.9 | 2.7 ± 12.4 | 0.17 |
| Average flow index (L/min/m2) | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.8 | −2.3 ± 10.2 | 0.13 |
| Forward volume (mL/beat) | 123.5 ± 26.8 | 122.7 ± 31.6 | −1.1 ± 8.6 | 0.75 |
| Reverse volume (mL/beat) | 45.3 ± 25.0 | 42.4 ± 24.1 | −6.5 ± 8.6 | 0.01 |
| Regurgitant fraction % | 35.3 ± 16.4 | 33.3 ± 15.1 | −5.2 ± 7.8 | 0.02 |
| Aorta (n=11) | | | | |
| Average velocity (m/s) | 14.1 ± 6.2 | 13.4 ± 6.3 | −4.8 ± 8.0 | 0.10 |
| Average flow index (L/min/m2) | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 13.0 | 0.71 |
| Forward volume (mL/beat) | 74.8 ± 17.2 | 71.3 ± 18.8 | −6.3 ± 9.7 | 0.05 |
| Reverse volume (mL/beat) | 3.2 ± 4.4 | 3.1 ± 5.1 | −28.4 ± 43.4† | 0.73 |
| Regurgitant fraction % | 4.5 ± 6.4 | 4.2 ± 5.4 | −23.1 ± 45.1† | 0.51 |
*By paired t-test between baseline values and iNO values.
†Outliers excluded.
Figure 2Effect of iNO in matched paired analysis (n=16). (A) Pulmonary regurgitant fraction and (B) pulmonary artery reverse volume at baseline and during administration of 40 ppm iNO.
Figure 3Right ventricular end diastolic volume index (RV EDVi) as a function of pulmonary insufficiency (PI) (n=16). RV EDVi has been shown to correlate with PI in large scale studies. We observed a similar relationship but with a low r2 value.
Figure 4Pulmonary Insufficiency (PI) as a function of time from complete repair (n=16). PI is known to be a progressive disease and our observation of the contrary could reflect referral bias as most patients enrolled were referred for evaluation for symptoms.