BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms routinely sample pulmonary regurgitation signals from which it is possible to measure end diastolic gradients; these correlate with pulmonary artery diastolic pressures. METHODS: We performed echocardiograms in 741 ambulatory adults with coronary artery disease who were recruited for the Heart and Soul Study. We compared indicators of cardiac status among individuals with normal (0-5.0 mm Hg) and elevated (> 5.0 mm Hg) end diastolic pulmonary regurgitation (EDPR) gradients. RESULTS: Of the 481 participants with measurable EDPR gradients, 21% had elevated EDPR gradients (> 5.0 mm Hg). EDPR gradients > 5.0 mm Hg were associated with higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = .002), higher brain natriuretic peptide (P = .002), fewer metabolic equivalents achieved on treadmill testing (P < 0.001), and higher left ventricular mass (P < 0.001). The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 25% (95% confidence interval 20-30%) and a specificity of 86% (80-91%) for detecting at least one of the following: systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or abnormal wall motion score. The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm HG was statistically equivalent to the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient > 30 mm Hg in terms of diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve equaled 0.58 for each test). The EDPR gradient increased the yield of pulmonary artery pressures from 61% (TR gradient alone) to 84% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The EDPR gradient provides valuable information independent of the TR gradient in evaluating pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms routinely sample pulmonary regurgitation signals from which it is possible to measure end diastolic gradients; these correlate with pulmonary artery diastolic pressures. METHODS: We performed echocardiograms in 741 ambulatory adults with coronary artery disease who were recruited for the Heart and Soul Study. We compared indicators of cardiac status among individuals with normal (0-5.0 mm Hg) and elevated (> 5.0 mm Hg) end diastolic pulmonary regurgitation (EDPR) gradients. RESULTS: Of the 481 participants with measurable EDPR gradients, 21% had elevated EDPR gradients (> 5.0 mm Hg). EDPR gradients > 5.0 mm Hg were associated with higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = .002), higher brain natriuretic peptide (P = .002), fewer metabolic equivalents achieved on treadmill testing (P < 0.001), and higher left ventricular mass (P < 0.001). The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm Hg had a sensitivity of 25% (95% confidence interval 20-30%) and a specificity of 86% (80-91%) for detecting at least one of the following: systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or abnormal wall motion score. The EDPR gradient > 5.0 mm HG was statistically equivalent to the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient > 30 mm Hg in terms of diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve equaled 0.58 for each test). The EDPR gradient increased the yield of pulmonary artery pressures from 61% (TR gradient alone) to 84% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The EDPR gradient provides valuable information independent of the TR gradient in evaluating pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac dysfunction.
Authors: Hirotsugu Yamada; Ping-Ping Goh; Jing Ping Sun; Jill Odabashian; Mario J Garcia; James D Thomas; Allan L Klein Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: B C Maciel; I A Simpson; L M Valdes-Cruz; F Recusani; B Hoit; N Dalton; R Weintraub; D J Sahn Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1991 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Eric S Williams; Sanjiv J Shah; Sadia Ali; Bee Ya Na; Nelson B Schiller; Mary A Whooley Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Kiran K Khush; Sanjiv J Shah; Bryan Ristow; Teresa De Marco; Mary A Whooley; Nelson B Schiller Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Stephen A Hart; Ganesh P Devendra; Yuli Y Kim; Scott D Flamm; Vidyasagar Kalahasti; Janine Arruda; Esteban Walker; Thananya Boonyasirinant; Michael Bolen; Randolph Setser; Richard A Krasuski Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 5.364