Literature DB >> 24005789

Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.

Ullrich K H Ecker1, Stephan Lewandowsky, Olivia Fenton, Kelsey Martin.   

Abstract

Misinformation-defined as information that is initially assumed to be valid but is later corrected or retracted-often has an ongoing effect on people's memory and reasoning. We tested the hypotheses that (a) reliance on misinformation is affected by people's preexisting attitudes and (b) attitudes determine the effectiveness of retractions. In two experiments, participants scoring higher and lower on a racial prejudice scale read a news report regarding a robbery. In one scenario, the suspects were initially presented as being Australian Aboriginals, whereas in a second scenario, a hero preventing the robbery was introduced as an Aboriginal person. Later, these critical, race-related pieces of information were or were not retracted. We measured participants' reliance on misinformation in response to inferential reasoning questions. The results showed that preexisting attitudes influence people's use of attitude-related information but not the way in which a retraction of that information is processed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24005789     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Setting the record straight: vaccines, autism, and the Lancet.

Authors:  Scott C Ratzan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-04

2.  A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority.

Authors:  Rachel Casiday; Tricia Cresswell; Deb Wilson; Catherine Panter-Brick
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer; Abby E H Chee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker; Colleen M Seifert; Norbert Schwarz; John Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-12

5.  The truth about the truth: a meta-analytic review of the truth effect.

Authors:  Alice Dechêne; Christoph Stahl; Jochim Hansen; Michaela Wänke
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-18

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Terrorists brought down the plane!--No, actually it was a technical fault: processing corrections of emotive information.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Joe Apai
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: constructing grounds for subtyping deviants.

Authors:  Z Kunda; K C Oleson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-04

10.  Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information.

Authors:  E L Bjork; R A Bjork
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1996 Mar-Jun
View more
  11 in total

1.  Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect.

Authors:  Andrea E O'Rear; Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

2.  Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Aviva Philipp-Muller; Spike W S Lee; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.

Authors:  Man-Pui Sally Chan; Christopher R Jones; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Does fact-checking habit promote COVID-19 knowledge during the pandemic? Evidence from China.

Authors:  W Yu; F Shen
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.

Authors:  Briony Swire; Adam J Berinsky; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error.

Authors:  Alyssa H Sinclair; Matthew L Stanley; Paul Seli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

7.  An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation.

Authors:  Wenjing Pan; Diyi Liu; Jie Fang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  When and why do people act on flawed science? Effects of anecdotes and prior beliefs on evidence-based decision-making.

Authors:  Audrey L Michal; Yiwen Zhong; Priti Shah
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-06

9.  Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Kendra L Pizzonia; Anna B Drummey; Eli J V Mikkelsen
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-11-27

10.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.