Literature DB >> 24004700

A randomized controlled trial to improve colon cancer screening in rural family medicine: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study.

Barcey T Levy1, Yinghui Xu, Jeanette M Daly, John W Ely.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many adults have not been screened for colon cancer, a potentially preventable cause of death.
METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted between December 2008 and April 2011 to improve CRC screening in 16 rural family physician offices. Subjects due for CRC screening were randomized within each practice to 1 of 4 groups: (1) usual care; (2) physician chart reminder; (3) physician chart reminder, mailed education, CRC reminder magnet, and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (mailed education/FIT); or (4) all the preceding plus a structured telephone call to the patient from project staff to provide education, assess interest in screening, explain the screening tests, and address barriers (mailed education/FIT plus phone call). The main outcome was completion of any CRC screening.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 743 patients. CRC screening was completed by 17.8% in the usual care group, 20.5% in the chart reminder group, 56.5% in the mailed education/FIT group, and 57.2% in the mailed education/FIT plus phone call group. We found no effect from the chart reminder compared with usual care (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.0); and a beneficial effect from the mailed education/FIT (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.7-9.6) and the mailed education/FIT plus phone call (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 3.8-9.9). Both FIT and colonoscopy rates increased significantly in both mailed education groups.
CONCLUSION: CRC screening rates increased significantly among patients who were overdue for screening after they received mailed educational materials and a FIT. The addition of a phone call did not further increase screening rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Screening; Colorectal Cancer; Early Medical Intervention (Educational); Practice-based Research; Randomized Controlled Trial; Reminder Systems; Rural Health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24004700     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  27 in total

1.  Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette M Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Cheryl B Aspy; Rowena J Dolor; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey T Levy; Hannah L Palac; LeAnn Michaels; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Paul D Smith; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Pamela Sterling; Maeve O'Beirne; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Camden Bay; Yinghui Xu; Jeanette M Daly; George Bergus; Jeffrey Dunkelberg; Carol Moss
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Stacie Miller; Mark Koch; Emily Berry; Paula Anderson; Sandi L Pruitt; Eric Borton; Amy E Hughes; Elizabeth Carter; Sylvia Hernandez; Helen Pozos; Ethan A Halm; Ayelet Gneezy; Alicea J Lieberman; Celette Sugg Skinner; Keith Argenbright; Bijal Balasubramanian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Effect of Ambient Temperature Variations on Positivity of Manual Fecal Immunochemical Tests.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Camden P Bay; Yinghui Xu; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-05-28

7.  Free Fecal Immunochemical Test Disbursement in Eight Family Physician Offices.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-10

8.  Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Briton Lee; Shreya Patel; Carly Rachocki; Rachel Issaka; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Gloria D Coronado; Amanda Petrik; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Financial Incentives to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Alicea Lieberman; Ayelet Gneezy; Emily Berry; Stacie Miller; Mark Koch; Chul Ahn; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Keith E Argenbright; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.