OBJECTIVES: Fidaxomicin reduces the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) compared with vancomycin. We investigated fidaxomicin primary or secondary treatment efficacy using a gut model. METHODS: Four triple-stage chemostat gut models were inoculated with faeces. After clindamycin induction of CDI, fidaxomicin (200 mg/L twice daily), vancomycin (125 mg/L four times daily) or metronidazole (9.3 mg/L three times daily) was administered for 7 days. Following failure/CDI recurrence, fidaxomicin (200 mg/L twice daily, 7 days) was instilled. C. difficile (CD) total viable counts (TVC), spore counts (SP), toxin titres (CYT), gut bacteria counts and antimicrobial concentrations were measured throughout. RESULTS: Fidaxomicin instillation reduced CD TVC/SP and CYT below the limit of detection (LOD) after 2 and 4 days, respectively, with no CDI recurrence. Metronidazole instillation failed to decrease CD TVC or CYT. Vancomycin instillation reduced CD TVC and CYT to LOD by day 4, but SP persisted. Recurrence occurred 13 days after vancomycin instillation; subsequent fidaxomicin instillation reduced CD TVC/SP/CYT below the LOD from day 2. CD was isolated sporadically, with no evidence of spore recrudescence or toxin production. Fidaxomicin had a minimal effect on the microflora, except for bifidobacteria. Fidaxomicin was detected for at least 21 days post-instillation, whereas other antimicrobials were undetectable beyond ∼4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Fidaxomicin successfully treated simulated primary and recurrent CDI. Fidaxomicin was superior to metronidazole in reducing CD TVC and SP, and superior to vancomycin in reducing SP without recurrence of vegetative cell growth. Fidaxomicin, but not vancomycin or metronidazole, persisted in the gut model for >20 days after instillation.
OBJECTIVES:Fidaxomicin reduces the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) compared with vancomycin. We investigated fidaxomicin primary or secondary treatment efficacy using a gut model. METHODS: Four triple-stage chemostat gut models were inoculated with faeces. After clindamycin induction of CDI, fidaxomicin (200 mg/L twice daily), vancomycin (125 mg/L four times daily) or metronidazole (9.3 mg/L three times daily) was administered for 7 days. Following failure/CDI recurrence, fidaxomicin (200 mg/L twice daily, 7 days) was instilled. C. difficile (CD) total viable counts (TVC), spore counts (SP), toxin titres (CYT), gut bacteria counts and antimicrobial concentrations were measured throughout. RESULTS:Fidaxomicin instillation reduced CD TVC/SP and CYT below the limit of detection (LOD) after 2 and 4 days, respectively, with no CDI recurrence. Metronidazole instillation failed to decrease CD TVC or CYT. Vancomycin instillation reduced CD TVC and CYT to LOD by day 4, but SP persisted. Recurrence occurred 13 days after vancomycin instillation; subsequent fidaxomicin instillation reduced CD TVC/SP/CYT below the LOD from day 2. CD was isolated sporadically, with no evidence of spore recrudescence or toxin production. Fidaxomicin had a minimal effect on the microflora, except for bifidobacteria. Fidaxomicin was detected for at least 21 days post-instillation, whereas other antimicrobials were undetectable beyond ∼4 days. CONCLUSIONS:Fidaxomicin successfully treated simulated primary and recurrent CDI. Fidaxomicin was superior to metronidazole in reducing CD TVC and SP, and superior to vancomycin in reducing SP without recurrence of vegetative cell growth. Fidaxomicin, but not vancomycin or metronidazole, persisted in the gut model for >20 days after instillation.
Authors: Hannah C Harris; Emma L Best; Charmaine Normington; Nathalie Saint-Lu; Frédérique Sablier-Gallis; Jean de Gunzburg; Antoine Andremont; Mark H Wilcox; Caroline H Chilton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ines B Moura; Charmaine Normington; Duncan Ewin; Emma Clark; Mark H Wilcox; Anthony M Buckley; Caroline H Chilton Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 3.605
Authors: Julie A K McDonald; Benjamin H Mullish; Alexandros Pechlivanis; Zhigang Liu; Jerusa Brignardello; Dina Kao; Elaine Holmes; Jia V Li; Thomas B Clarke; Mark R Thursz; Julian R Marchesi Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Anthony M Buckley; Ines B Moura; Norie Arai; William Spittal; Emma Clark; Yoshihiro Nishida; Hannah C Harris; Karen Bentley; Georgina Davis; Dapeng Wang; Suparna Mitra; Takanobu Higashiyama; Mark H Wilcox Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Grace S Crowther; Caroline H Chilton; Sharie L Todhunter; Scott Nicholson; Jane Freeman; Simon D Baines; Mark H Wilcox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David W Eyre; Farah Babakhani; David Griffiths; Jaime Seddon; Carlos Del Ojo Elias; Sherwood L Gorbach; Tim E A Peto; Derrick W Crook; A Sarah Walker Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 5.226