BACKGROUND: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measures the number and size of lipoprotein particles instead of their cholesterol or triglyceride content, but its clinical utility is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline lipoproteins were measured by NMR in 27 673 initially healthy women followed up for incident cardiovascular disease (n=1015) over an 11-year period. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the top versus the bottom quintile of NMR-measured lipoprotein particle concentration (measured in particles per liter) were 2.51 (1.91 to 3.30) for low-density lipoprotein (LDL(NMR)), 0.91 (0.75 to 1.12) for high-density lipoprotein (HDL(NMR)), 1.71 (1.38 to 2.12) for very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL(NMR)), and 2.25 (1.80 to 2.81) for the LDL(NMR)/HDL(NMR) ratio. Similarly adjusted results for NMR-measured lipoprotein particle size (measured in nanometers) were 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79) for LDL(NMR) size, 0.65 (0.51 to 0.81) for HDL(NMR) size, and 1.37 (1.10 to 1.70) for VLDL(NMR) size. Hazard ratios for NMR measures were comparable but not superior to standard lipids (total cholesterol 2.08 [1.63 to 2.67], LDL cholesterol 1.74 [1.40 to 2.16], HDL cholesterol 0.52 [0.42 to 0.64], triglycerides 2.58 [1.95 to 3.41], non-HDL cholesterol 2.52 [1.95 to 3.25], total/HDL cholesterol ratio 2.82 [2.23 to 3.58]) and apolipoproteins (B(100) 2.57 [1.98 to 3.33], A-1 0.63 [0.52 to 0.77], and B(100)/A-1 ratio 2.79 [2.21 to 3.54]). Essentially no reclassification improvement was found with the addition of the LDL(NMR) particle concentration or apolipoprotein B(100) to a model that already included the total/HDL cholesterol ratio and nonlipid risk factors (net reclassification index 0% and 1.9%, respectively), nor did the addition of either variable result in a statistically significant improvement in the c-index. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of healthy women, cardiovascular disease risk prediction associated with lipoprotein profiles evaluated by NMR was comparable but not superior to that of standard lipids or apolipoproteins.
BACKGROUND: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measures the number and size of lipoprotein particles instead of their cholesterol or triglyceride content, but its clinical utility is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline lipoproteins were measured by NMR in 27 673 initially healthy women followed up for incident cardiovascular disease (n=1015) over an 11-year period. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the top versus the bottom quintile of NMR-measured lipoprotein particle concentration (measured in particles per liter) were 2.51 (1.91 to 3.30) for low-density lipoprotein (LDL(NMR)), 0.91 (0.75 to 1.12) for high-density lipoprotein (HDL(NMR)), 1.71 (1.38 to 2.12) for very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL(NMR)), and 2.25 (1.80 to 2.81) for the LDL(NMR)/HDL(NMR) ratio. Similarly adjusted results for NMR-measured lipoprotein particle size (measured in nanometers) were 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79) for LDL(NMR) size, 0.65 (0.51 to 0.81) for HDL(NMR) size, and 1.37 (1.10 to 1.70) for VLDL(NMR) size. Hazard ratios for NMR measures were comparable but not superior to standard lipids (total cholesterol 2.08 [1.63 to 2.67], LDL cholesterol 1.74 [1.40 to 2.16], HDL cholesterol 0.52 [0.42 to 0.64], triglycerides 2.58 [1.95 to 3.41], non-HDL cholesterol 2.52 [1.95 to 3.25], total/HDL cholesterol ratio 2.82 [2.23 to 3.58]) and apolipoproteins (B(100) 2.57 [1.98 to 3.33], A-1 0.63 [0.52 to 0.77], and B(100)/A-1 ratio 2.79 [2.21 to 3.54]). Essentially no reclassification improvement was found with the addition of the LDL(NMR) particle concentration or apolipoprotein B(100) to a model that already included the total/HDL cholesterol ratio and nonlipid risk factors (net reclassification index 0% and 1.9%, respectively), nor did the addition of either variable result in a statistically significant improvement in the c-index. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of healthy women, cardiovascular disease risk prediction associated with lipoprotein profiles evaluated by NMR was comparable but not superior to that of standard lipids or apolipoproteins.
Authors: A R Sharrett; C M Ballantyne; S A Coady; G Heiss; P D Sorlie; D Catellier; W Patsch Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-09-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; David Gordon; J Michael Gaziano; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William C Cromwell; James D Otvos; Michelle J Keyes; Michael J Pencina; Lisa Sullivan; Ramachandran S Vasan; Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Lewis Kuller; Alice Arnold; Russell Tracy; James Otvos; Greg Burke; Bruce Psaty; David Siscovick; David S Freedman; Richard Kronmal Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: P J Barter; C M Ballantyne; R Carmena; M Castro Cabezas; M John Chapman; P Couture; J de Graaf; P N Durrington; O Faergeman; J Frohlich; C D Furberg; C Gagne; S M Haffner; S E Humphries; I Jungner; R M Krauss; P Kwiterovich; S Marcovina; C J Packard; T A Pearson; K Srinath Reddy; R Rosenson; N Sarrafzadegan; A D Sniderman; A F Stalenhoef; E Stein; P J Talmud; A M Tonkin; G Walldius; K M S Williams Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Patrick M Hutchins; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Trevor J Orchard; Graziella E Ronsein; Jay W Heinecke Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Audrey Y Chu; Franco Giulianini; Bryan J Barratt; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Samia Mora; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2015-08-13
Authors: Edward K Duran; Aaron W Aday; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker; Aruna D Pradhan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Graziella E Ronsein; Patrick M Hutchins; Daniel Isquith; Tomas Vaisar; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Jay W Heinecke Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Phyllis C Tien; Michael F Schneider; Christopher Cox; Mardge Cohen; Roksana Karim; Jason Lazar; Mary Young; Marshall J Glesby Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Carlos Lorenzo; Sara Hartnett; Anthony J Hanley; Marian J Rewers; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Andrew J Karter; Steven M Haffner Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Daniel J Conklin; Suzaynn Schick; Michael J Blaha; Alex Carll; Andrew DeFilippis; Peter Ganz; Michael E Hall; Naomi Hamburg; Tim O'Toole; Lindsay Reynolds; Sanjay Srivastava; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.733